Mayweather's Defense vs. Whitaker's

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mike ruler
    Interim Champion
    • May 2007
    • 720
    • 79
    • 4
    • 13,408

    #1

    Mayweather's Defense vs. Whitaker's

    Whose was better. Both amazing.
    59
    Whitaker
    33.90%
    20
    Mayweather
    50.85%
    30
    Tie
    15.25%
    9

    The poll is expired.

  • 1SILVA
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 1690
    • 41
    • 0
    • 8,440

    #2
    Originally posted by mike ruler
    Whose was better. Both amazing.
    Tough call. They were the best defensive fighters of the last 25 years

    Comment

    • Junito-Rulez
      BS's Tony Montana
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 6095
      • 375
      • 439
      • 13,296

      #3
      Both were great, Pernell relied more on athleticism, Floyd more on pure technique and reaction punches. It's 50/50.

      Comment

      • Stoppage
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 5637
        • 84
        • 92
        • 12,304

        #4
        I'm going with Whitaker but Mayweather is still a great defensive fighter.

        Comment

        • Obama
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 4563
          • 978
          • 62
          • 11,854

          #5
          Whitaker..by a fair bit. Floyd's top notch defense will last longer tho, as he's more fundamental in his approach.

          This is no knock on Floyd tho being inferior to Whitaker in this department. Floyd's offense is clearly better than Whitaker's, much more so than Whitaker's defense is better than Floyd's.

          Comment

          • Dynamite Kid
            Slicker than your average
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2007
            • 20701
            • 627
            • 209
            • 38,291

            #6
            Difference between Mayweather and Whitaker's defence is.............Whitaker was more aggressive and had more heart and beat better fighters.

            Comment

            • sonnyboyx2
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 5812
              • 185
              • 181
              • 14,549

              #7
              Originally posted by Obama
              Whitaker..by a fair bit. Floyd's top notch defense will last longer tho, as he's more fundamental in his approach.

              This is no knock on Floyd tho being inferior to Whitaker in this department. Floyd's offense is clearly better than Whitaker's, much more so than Whitaker's defense is better than Floyd's.
              i am sitting on the fence as far as who had the better defence goes But i cannot agree with you that Mayweathers offense was better than Whitakers, Floyd has virtually `no-offense` where as Sweet-Pea had an excellent offense

              Comment

              • Benncollinsaad
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 4210
                • 98
                • 40
                • 4,773

                #8
                Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
                Difference between Mayweather and Whitaker's defence is.............Whitaker was more aggressive and had more heart and beat better fighters.
                But the 140 and 147 divisions were not as strong in Whitaker's time as in Mayweather's, arguably.

                Comment

                • Stoppage
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 5637
                  • 84
                  • 92
                  • 12,304

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Benncollinsaad
                  But the 140 and 147 divisions were not as strong in Whitaker's time as in Mayweather's, arguably.
                  While you can make an arguement for that, Whitaker beat the better opposition.

                  Floyd hasn't fought the best while Whitaker did.

                  Comment

                  • Dynamite Kid
                    Slicker than your average
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 20701
                    • 627
                    • 209
                    • 38,291

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Benncollinsaad
                    But the 140 and 147 divisions were not as strong in Whitaker's time as in Mayweather's, arguably.
                    Even if that is the case, which im not saying it is, it does not really hold much water because Floyd wont fight the 147 pounders and he did not fight Tszyu either.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP