Originally posted by The Old LefHook
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which Statistical Data Could Shed The Most Light
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by them_apples View Post
curious why you don't like what Mike sliver has to say, a very knowledgeable boxing historian. Sure he throws some crazy numbers around, but so dowe all, including you. He's got a pretty good depth on knowledge though. I literally read his book once years ago - this is the 3rd time you have brought it up.
Also, I'm interested to hear, what crazy numbers I have been throwing around?
Comment
-
Originally posted by them_apples View Post
In the mean time you can watch moorer sparring matthew saad, toney sparring Mclellan and Hearns sparring mcallum. Footage of them ****ing away.
I feel pretty confident about Moorer and Hearns, but not the others I guess. What's it matter? Read my signature.Last edited by The Old LefHook; 08-07-2022, 02:37 PM.them_apples likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by them_apples View Post
curious why you don't like what Mike sliver has to say, a very knowledgeable boxing historian. Sure he throws some crazy numbers around, but so dowe all, including you. He's got a pretty good depth on knowledge though. I literally read his book once years ago - this is the 3rd time you have brought it up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bundana View Post
It's been a couple of days, since I asked you... so I'll try again: What crazy numbers have I been throwing around?
I program it for you:
crazy numbers = numbers with limited value
“crazy numbers” are being used to argue complex claims.
so no, not crazy - but no more informational than a lot of observations, is all I’m trying to say. Same goes for Mike Silver, I won’t use his numbers to back my points up - when billions of circumstantial things have changed since then.
I’m serious though thats why I don’t feel compelled to respond sometimes. You read something I say and fixate on the way I word it. We end up arguing about nothing. I didn’t need to explain to you what crazy numbers meant.Last edited by them_apples; 08-13-2022, 09:59 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by them_apples View Post
Well no crazier than silvers numbers. You fixate on the word crazy but failed to interpret my point.
I program it for you:
crazy numbers = numbers with limited value
"numbers" are being used to argue complex claims.
so no, not crazy - but no more informational than a lot of observations, is all I'm trying to say. Same goes for Mike Silver, I won't use his numbers to back my points up - when billions of circumstantial things have changed since then.
I'm serious though thats why I don't feel compelled to respond sometimes. You read something I say and fixate on the way I word it. We end up arguing about nothing. I didn't need to explain to you what crazy numbers meant.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bundana View Post
Ok, forget the word "crazy". Just give me an example of numbers of limited value, I have been throwing around. Come to think of it... forget about the "limited value" thing as well. How about just giving me an example of any kind of numbers, I have posted here, that you disagree with?
We won't enter some serious numbers territory anytime soon, it would require things to be measured from day one with intention of com*****g all the data in years to come. Likened to Zuckerburgs VR head sets or Apples phones. "Freakanomics" is a good eye opener.
Since the word "crazy" was the only thing you were questioning, I'm not sure what we are arguing about. If I don't respond it just means I don't know if it's worth continuing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by them_apples View Post
I don't "disagree" with them, I take them with a grain of salt. Your numbers from boxrec aren't "wrong" they simply don't paint a fact or truth about anything, they are simply complimentary to an argument. It's like com*****g any history, you use sources, but you are always at the mercy of the sources value.
We won't enter some serious numbers territory anytime soon, it would require things to be measured from day one with intention of com*****g all the data in years to come. Likened to Zuckerburgs VR head sets or Apples phones. "Freakanomics" is a good eye opener.
Since the word "crazy" was the only thing you were questioning, I'm not sure what we are arguing about. If I don't respond it just means I don't know if it's worth continuing.
See how that work? Prove U not moneybot clone...still waiting on Godot...
Comment
-
Comment