Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What is it with Smokin' Joe and the Trolls?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by War Room View Post

    In a thread that is named Best Left Hook you said Jeff Lacy...he was so good he was named after it. You said that, you said the words lmao. What part of that makes you malfunction?

    The point is you're an idiot and you saying Jeff Lacy has the best left hook is a public display of you being an idiot.

    You're all over the place, you say things backwards which is why I think you're medically unfit for a killer like me.

    You have profession articles? PROFESSION ARTICLES?

    You can't even spell, you can't think straight, and when you do ---> you say a bunch of mumbo jumbo like you're handicapped.

    All you do on this site is call people ****** all day. You post zero substance and when you try to, it's some nostalgia riddled tripe of a forgotten era. Joe Frazier sucks, get it through your thick skull ---> Del Boy would end his career. Dempsey was maybe tough fight a 100 years ago, but today Jake Paul mauls him ---> I would take Butterbean over Dempsey.

    You're a broken old man that's got the old world blues. I blocked you for MONTHS and you kept replying to me like I could read your posts. Are you out of your god dang mind man?

    I do my share of calling people out, but I'm posting nutritious content. You ---> you're a sick person and should get some professional help.
    lol... please, spare me the innanity.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by billeau2 View Post

      lol... please, spare me the innanity.
      Who the hell says inanity? Watch out kids, we got a big 5 dollar word in the area, proceed with caution lmao! Such desperation to impress and sound smart ---> to top it off you misspelled it smdh. You said innanity ---> it's inanity. I actually had to look this up, not like I would ever use it without trying to look like a tryhard. How is any of my post lacking sense or meaning???

      You know what, don't answer that.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by War Room View Post

        Who the hell says inanity? Watch out kids, we got a big 5 dollar word in the area, proceed with caution lmao! Such desperation to impress and sound smart ---> to top it off you misspelled it smdh. You said innanity ---> it's inanity. I actually had to look this up, not like I would ever use it without trying to look like a tryhard. How is any of my post lacking sense or meaning???

        You know what, don't answer that.
        your fun! The word is not really very rare. I guess for someone who does not "get" the concept of irony in a post, it is a stretch. I have to warn you... Im gonna mispel a lot of words! be forewarned! Come on lets play your turn!!!!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by billeau2 View Post
          Its crazy... what did Joe do? I mean the guy had one punching arm, a bad eye, and still managed to be one of the best... Yet it seems lately that every troll wants to piss on Joe! We have War room with the immortal quote in my sig: "Frazier was an arm puncher." Know we have a new troll talking about Joe with out of space type shiat...

          Last week it was how Joe never fought a solid puncher from another member...

          My question is... what did Joe do to deserve this?! Did he like to piss in people's corn flakes or something? I mean the guy was a wrecking ball. He fought lots of tough fighters that don't get the name recognition of later guys like Ali... Guys like Ellis who was a phenominal fighter who moved very well... One eyed, one armed Joe found him doe. And Foster was lighter but a murderous puncher.

          Sheesh!
          I can answer. What is up is they are churlish know-nothings. What did Joe do to earn their scorn? He beat up a lot of people. Once, he beat up the fighter most boxing observers consider the greatest heavyweight ever. Foamy lipped, his detractors scream in tears: "he never beat a power puncher."

          He only fought one, dopey churls. Which power puncher besides Foreman did he fail against?
          Last edited by The Old LefHook; 06-12-2022, 05:36 PM.
          billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post

            I can answer. What is up is they are churlish no-nothings. What did Joe do to earn their scorn? He beat up a lot of people. Once, he beat up the fighter most boxing observers consider the greatest heavyweight ever. Foamy lipped, his detractors scream in tears: "he never beat a power puncher."

            He only fought one, dopey churls. Which power puncher besides Foreman did he fail against?
            I personally believe that there is a special place for guys who took what they had and adapted to the situation at hand. According to Darwin that would be the ultimate act of intelligence guaranteeing survival. I mean so much for survival of the fittest right? Lets start with Armstrong... Homicidal Hank had no reach, no elegance... Then lets look at Marciano, two left feet, yada yada... Then we have James Braddock who used a hiatus to become a strevedore necessitating he strengthen his other arm... from adversity came a big chocolate cake! James Braddock was born into the holy kingdom of the square circle as a one armed pug... reborn as a two armed fighter!

            Smokin Joe was of that cloth... Like Liston, a sharecropper's son... Nobody could tell Joe what he could do! If you gave him a toothpick, he was going to clean out those crevices!! He had a good left and a great engine... he made it work. I don't see how people can neglect that,

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by War Room View Post

              Who the hell says inanity? Watch out kids, we got a big 5 dollar word in the area, proceed with caution lmao! Such desperation to impress and sound smart ---> to top it off you misspelled it smdh. You said innanity ---> it's inanity. I actually had to look this up, not like I would ever use it without trying to look like a tryhard. How is any of my post lacking sense or meaning???

              You know what, don't answer that.
              Hey toots!! I could send you a new word to look up everyday, there is even an app for that!! It would help you increase your vocabulary. The word for today is douche. And what is so good about this word is you can see an example of it looking in the mirror!

              As QueenB says: "your welcome."

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Willow The Wisp View Post

                Read all about it Here:
                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supe...can_TV_program)
                Note that Mark Gastineau won the whole thing one year. Ever see him fight?
                I don't recall if Mark Spitz was ever in it. My use of his name was as an example of what being an allround athlete/fitness fanatic/game player means to being a successful fighter. It is a useful single component, like being tough, brave, strong, explosive, durable, statigic, unflappable, aggressive, committed, scrappy. Lol.
                Gridiron representatives had the most success in the superstars competition over the years. I would expect that, since the show chose the fast ones to compete, not linemen. No surprise. Now of course Greg Pruit and OJ Simpson could beat poor Joe like a tow-headed stepchild in the events they had.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by War Room View Post

                  Who the hell says inanity? Watch out kids, we got a big 5 dollar word in the area, proceed with caution lmao! Such desperation to impress and sound smart ---> to top it off you misspelled it smdh. You said innanity ---> it's inanity. I actually had to look this up, not like I would ever use it without trying to look like a tryhard. How is any of my post lacking sense or meaning???

                  You know what, don't answer that.
                  I'll answer. All your posts lack sense and meaning. You are a total churlwit with nothing to say. Go bark at passing cars, you cur.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post

                    I'll answer. All your posts lack sense and meaning. You are a total churlwit with nothing to say. Go bark at passing cars, you cur.
                    What is a churlwit?

                    Most of my content is academic, concise, source material provided, and majority is objective. Hardly nothing to say, lacking sense, or meaning. You're just mad =---> because, I dunno. Why does it make you mad that I'm the #1 poster on this site?

                    Nobody brings the nutritious content like I do. Not only that, I create original animated and video content on a regular basis.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      A churlwit is similar to a halfwit when you do not know the exact fraction.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP