Everyone forgets Vitali was nearly Furys height at 6 ft 8

[JAB5239]

- -No, U dummy obviously unable to do head to head on their timelines. U dummy 0-6, 0 KOs lest U dummy ferget Holmesy title record vs standing champs. Yes, beating weak as a new born sick Ali means everything to U.

A head to head on their timelines? Holmes has the better resume and is far more highly regarded. End of story. Is it rec time at the institution you're committed to right now? Just curious. Did you get a snack today?

[QueensburyRules]

You must have missed where I said earlier in this thread that Holmes beat more current, future and past wod champions than Vits in their first 47 fights. Lacking comprehension?

- -Must've missed Holmesy 0-6, 0 KOs vs standing champs having won a title in the ring.

Giving U dimwitness a chance to do more than lunch down pearls thrown U way, but piggy gonna squeal no matter what the circumstance.

[JAB5239]

- -Must've missed Holmesy 0-6, 0 KOs vs standing champs having won a title in the ring.

Giving U dimwitness a chance to do more than lunch down pearls thrown U way, but piggy gonna squeal no matter what the circumstance.

Norton was the WBC champion when Holmes beat him. If you wanna live by the ABC orgs you have to die with them too. Sorry sucka, you lose again!!!

Still rec time at the facility? Sorry it took me this long to get back to you. I actually train in combat sports. Training to you is picking up a bottle of vodka and acting like you know something. You don't.

[QueensburyRules]

Norton was the WBC champion when Holmes beat him. If you wanna live by the ABC orgs you have to die with them too. Sorry sucka, you lose again!!!

Still rec time at the facility? Sorry it took me this long to get back to you. I actually train in combat sports. Training to you is picking up a bottle of vodka and acting like you know something. You don't.

- -I perfectly understand how a dimwit who would tout the long discredited lineal title that has no definition other than archaic references would get all misty over Kenny's WBC Administrative Belt.

Kenny is a fav of mine and I personally thought he won all 3 Ali encounters, but when we post his official record, he lost the last two of those encounters.

U dumminess said Holmesy beat multiple current champs as well as those of the past and future, so U dumminess is wrong even if I give U an Aministrative title for Norton, but my criteria of Holmesy 0-6, 0 KO against standing champs having won their title in the Ring still stands firm until the firmament of time gives out trillions of eons from now.

And thanks again for reaffirming U timeline illiteracy. I gave U a vehicle of direct timeline comparison of Vit to Holmesy, and it was like throwing pearls to a pig. Y U pollute the history section when U know next to nothing about boxing history is something only minder might be able to explain.

[JAB5239]

- -I perfectly understand how a dimwit who would tout the long discredited lineal title that has no definition other than archaic references would get all misty over Kenny's WBC Administrative Belt.

Kenny is a fav of mine and I personally thought he won all 3 Ali encounters, but when we post his official record, he lost the last two of those encounters.

U dumminess said Holmesy beat multiple current champs as well as those of the past and future, so U dumminess is wrong even if I give U an Aministrative title for Norton, but my criteria of Holmesy 0-6, 0 KO against standing champs having won their title in the Ring still stands firm until the firmament of time gives out trillions of eons from now.

And thanks again for reaffirming U timeline illiteracy. I gave U a vehicle of direct timeline comparison of Vit to Holmesy, and it was like throwing pearls to a pig. Y U pollute the history section when U know next to nothing about boxing history is something only minder might be able to explain.

Again you are wrong. I said, and this is a fact, that Holmes beat more past, current and future champs than Vits. You tried pushing the goalposts back by saying he was 0-6 against standing champs having won their title in the ring, which is irrelevant. You also tried to use Charr as a world champion on Vits record when he was actually is sub titlist in the WBA's bid to get more sanctioning fees instead of a true world champion.


Quit while you're behind.

[QueensburyRules]

Again you are wrong. I said, and this is a fact, that Holmes beat more past, current and future champs than Vits. You tried pushing the goalposts back by saying he was 0-6 against standing champs having won their title in the ring, which is irrelevant. You also tried to use Charr as a world champion on Vits record when he was actually is sub titlist in the WBA's bid to get more sanctioning fees instead of a true world champion.


Quit while you're behind.

- -I used Charr as a reference to his continued primacy in the heavy division in comparison to Bey who had a baby record when he fought Holmesy and fell apart terribly after and soon out of boxing.

OK, we understand U to be a low level 1st grade reader, but Lar never beat more current champs than did Vit who beat Herbie Hide and Sam Peter for 2 his three titles owned. Poor Lar only gots 2, his WBC and the one he made up fer hisself, the IBF.

Ok, we understand U to be a self flagellating masochist, but really, Lar just emailed me to tell you to shuddup as U embarrassing him...

[JAB5239]

- -I used Charr as a reference to his continued primacy in the heavy division in comparison to Bey who had a baby record when he fought Holmesy and fell apart terribly after and soon out of boxing.

OK, we understand U to be a low level 1st grade reader, but Lar never beat more current champs than did Vit who beat Herbie Hide and Sam Peter for 2 his three titles owned. Poor Lar only gots 2, his WBC and the one he made up fer hisself, the IBF.

Ok, we understand U to be a self flagellating masochist, but really, Lar just emailed me to tell you to shuddup as U embarrassing him...

You're an idiot. At that point, thr 47 fight cutoff you wanted, Holmes had beaten Norton the WBC champion, Shavers the number 1 contender twice, Smith, Witherspoon, and Weaver 2x who would go on to hold ABC titles as well as Ali and Spinks who were former lineal world champions. Vits never beat aineal champion and lost both of his biggest fights. His best win was Corrie Sanders, a part time boxer-part time golfer who had exactly one win over a top 10 fighter. He also missed or didn't fight 28 revolving top 10 fighters in one of if not the weakest era in heavyweight history..

Time for you to go back with the other lunatics in the asylum. I'm sure it's almost snack time and than you're going to need your meds. And no, the bottle of bathtub gin doesn't count as men's old man.

[QueensburyRules]

You're an idiot. At that point, thr 47 fight cutoff you wanted, Holmes had beaten Norton the WBC champion, Shavers the number 1 contender twice, Smith, Witherspoon, and Weaver 2x who would go on to hold ABC titles as well as Ali and Spinks who were former lineal world champions. Vits never beat aineal champion and lost both of his biggest fights. His best win was Corrie Sanders, a part time boxer-part time golfer who had exactly one win over a top 10 fighter. He also missed or didn't fight 28 revolving top 10 fighters in one of if not the weakest era in heavyweight history..

Time for you to go back with the other lunatics in the asylum. I'm sure it's almost snack time and than you're going to need your meds. And no, the bottle of bathtub gin doesn't count as men's old man.

- -More drooling gibberish. Vit beat two standing champs for his titles + a vacant title for the 3 titles he held.

Holmesy only beat an Administrative title holder by the smallest possible margin with no lucrative rematch the people wanted to see, hence he was never the people's champ but he made U his chump.

Net result is U QUIT the direct fight by fight comparison of the two through the timeline because it makes U look all poopsydroopsy.

[Poet682006]

I'm no boxing expert. I'm no great historian. But you trying to tell me ANYTHING about boxing is comical. Put the bottle down, get back on your meds and get to a meeting.

Title comp? Lmai......I would guess most serious fans and historians would look at an entire career. With that said, Holmes is a top 5 all time great heavyweight. Vits isn't even top 20. There is a reason for that.

I'm pretty sure his shock treatments stopped working decades ago

[Poet682006]

A head to head on their timelines? Holmes has the better resume and is far more highly regarded. End of story. Is it rec time at the institution you're committed to right now? Just curious. Did you get a snack today?

More like Nurse Ratchett hasn't changed his Depends yet so he's finger painting now if you catch my drift