There was no Youtube in the 1930s... LOL
Logan Paul in the 1930s
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I think Mayweather could have performed in any era but in the '30s and '40s he would not have been a crowd favorite E.g. Burley, and would have fought before small crowds and likely not given a title shot.
Viewed as a tough fight who couldn't put butts in seats; a tough fight for small money not worth wasting a title defense on; he would have been ignored/ducked (word choice is your call: how you want to evaluate the fight game.)
His style was too defensive, too boring for the 1930s. Willie Pep was a defensive genius but could light up crowds with non stop action when the moments to go offensive arose - Floyd was too methodical; effective as hell but most times so boring.
Comment
-
Obviously most of the blowhards here haven't seen Pretty Boy Floyd fight film. He was anything but boring at his natural weight, prior to the hand problems,Last edited by ShoulderRoll; 07-05-2021, 12:37 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I think Mayweather could have performed in any era but in the '30s and '40s he would not have been a crowd favorite E.g. Burley, and would have fought before small crowds and likely not given a title shot.
Viewed as a tough fight who couldn't put butts in seats; a tough fight for small money not worth wasting a title defense on; he would have been ignored/ducked (word choice is your call: how you want to evaluate the fight game.)
His style was too defensive, too boring for the 1930s. Willie Pep was a defensive genius but could light up crowds with non stop action when the moments to go offensive arose - Floyd was too methodical; effective as hell but most times so boring.Comment
-
Comment
-
Logan Paul would have lasted 8 rounds with a 44-year-old Henry Armstrong too.
Or with whatever 1930's equivalent you want to bring up.Last edited by ShoulderRoll; 07-05-2021, 02:30 PM.Comment
Comment