- -Buster obviously great on his day, but with his prediabetic condition could never realize his full physical potential, and how about the heroic effort put up by Razor Ruddock in consecutive beatdowns, his broken jaw hanging out ringing like a Church bell with every Tyson punch?
What factors do you consider when determining a fighter’s greatness?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Puerto Rican women are nothing to trifle with... ask Margiano lol. Growing up in East Harlem they were the girls... And they were great, you just had to kind of accept the fact that copping a feel, making out, etc... You would probably be sporting a shiner for a few days after... But it was all in good fun... Unlike most places, in East harlem in the 70's when you went to homeroom with a shiner, instead of "owwww! you got hit hahaha who whipped that a s s?" it was more like: "Puerto Rican girl huh?"Comment
-
Comment
-
That's where the eyeball test comes in. Floyd Patterson was an immensely talented fighter, but in way over his head against Liston. It wasn't just Liston's size advantage, it was his superior skill that allowed for those two quick KO wins. Cleveland Williams in his prime was another highly underrated contender, and according to Foreman one of the three hardest hitters he ever sparred or fought in the ring. I would actually pick a prime Williams to beat a prime Wlad. Call me crazy.
Pretending Haye , Peter , Povetkin, Brewster ,Byrd , Chambers , Ibragomov ( better southpaw then Sanders ) and AJ who he managed to hurt bad are just stiff jabb ,jabb repeat fighters is ridiculous as a reason Williams and Listons opponents were better .Last edited by REDEEMER; 09-01-2021, 11:49 AM.Comment
-
How does one judge a good contender prior to ratings?
I know we but heads a lot so I just want to end by making it clear I'm interested in your opinion and have no good answers to argue myself.
Comment
-
What do you do with the pre-ratings fellas? WBA does start until 29. That puts the first ten HW champions outside of your criteria and that's just HW and just champions.
How does one judge a good contender prior to ratings?
I know we but heads a lot so I just want to end by making it clear I'm interested in your opinion and have no good answers to argue myself.
Look at Wilders title defenses and Joshuas .
Theres a clear difference in quality ,AJ is easily fighting better guys that’s not debatable and everyone he’s fought he’s defeated so far ,no one has walked away from him not losing .
Marciano vs Ali’s title defenses ? Clearly Ali is greater and had more title defenses against better fighters .
Joe Louis and Holmes hold the records but did they really fight better opponents ? Not really .
Last edited by REDEEMER; 09-01-2021, 11:56 AM.Comment
-
Cleveland was a good fighter but he beats Klitschko ? Williams fought 30 guys coming off loses in about 60 fights in a decade and compiled many guys coming off loses throughout his career . He has struggled with big guys and defeated just a few punchers not close to Klitschko. Who on Williams wins to you see that shows the can defeat a Wlad Klitschko that he’s defeated ? I don’t see anyone ., I’m not even sure why a particular individual on here is using Sanders who was a huge southpaw as proof ? Wlad didn’t even train fir a southpaw that night and under Steward would be near a huge mismatch against a Cleveland Williams .
Pretending Haye , Peter , Povetkin, Brewster ,Byrd , Chambers , Ibragomov ( better southpaw then Sanders ) and AJ who he managed to hurt bad are just stiff jabb ,jabb repeat fighters is ridiculous as a reason Williams and Listons opponents were better .Comment
Comment