Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Duran the greatest fighter still alive today?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

    Iole never produced a copy of that contract. Schaefer said he never saw such a contract.

    You can hijack another thread with another Vietnam war of attrition, but once Manny agreed to testing, Floyd countered with endless excuses and goal post moving to delay that fight.
    He stated flat out that he saw the contract. So you're saying you believe he is lying? The thing was so detailed that it talked about whose name would be on the posters first or something like that.

    I just asked a simple question. Do you believe Pacquiao needed 24 days to recover from giving less than 2 tbsps of blood? If you don't want to answer, then don't answer.

    Mayweather begged for the fight before his prison stint. Arum is on record saying Pac declined because he wanted to fight Marquez again, and that the Mayweather fight will always be there. You don't remember that? I'm sure I can jog your memory if you'd like, but I doubt you'd like me to because you'd rather dismiss any evidence and deflect to ad hominem attacks ("war of attrition"?) instead of looking at what really happened.


    By the way, Bob Arum admits to the contract in the same article. So no "war of attrition" is needed to know that the talk of Mayweather sending the 50/50 split contract was real.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by travestyny View Post

      He stated flat out that he saw the contract. So you're saying you believe he is lying? The thing was so detailed that it talked about whose name would be on the posters first or something like that.

      I just asked a simple question. Do you believe Pacquiao needed 24 days to recover from giving less than 2 tbsps of blood? If you don't want to answer, then don't answer.

      Mayweather begged for the fight before his prison stint. Arum is on record saying Pac declined because he wanted to fight Marquez again, and that the Mayweather fight will always be there. You don't remember that? I'm sure I can jog your memory if you'd like, but I doubt you'd like me to because you'd rather dismiss any evidence and deflect to ad hominem attacks ("war of attrition"?) instead of looking at what really happened.


      By the way, Bob Arum admits to the contract in the same article. So no "war of attrition" is needed to know that the talk of Mayweather sending the 50/50 split contract was real.
      All of the sudden Mr. Google doesn’t need hard evidence or sources? Just someone’s word...that contradicts Floyd’s people? Interesting.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

        All of the sudden Mr. Google doesn’t need hard evidence or sources? Just someone’s word...that contradicts Floyd’s people? Interesting.
        I have no idea what you are talking about. The evidence and source is Kevin Iole, Floyd Mayweather, and Bob Arum.


        If I'm "Mr. Google." Then who are you? Mr. no source? Mr. Emotional?

        I wish you could grow up and stop with the ad hominem attacks. You just make yourself look more and more pathetic.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by travestyny View Post

          I have no idea what you are talking about. The evidence and source is Kevin Iole, Floyd Mayweather, and Bob Arum.


          If I'm "Mr. Google." Then who are you? Mr. no source? Mr. Emotional?

          I wish you could grow up and stop with the ad hominem attacks. You just make yourself look more and more pathetic.
          Grow up? Should I post some of your posts form the PAC/Floyd thread? Lol. You’re the last person to talk.

          Schaefer said there was no contract. He was the promoter. Who would know better, Iole or Schaefer? Why is there no copy of this contract posted all social media and internet?

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

            Grow up? Should I post some of your posts form the PAC/Floyd thread? Lol. You’re the last person to talk.

            Schaefer said there was no contract. He was the promoter. Who would know better, Iole or Schaefer? Why is there no copy of this contract posted all social media and internet?
            You are constantly trying to drag conversations into the mud. You want to go back to 2016 now?


            I'm hip to your jive, man. I told all of you that if you want to go below the belt, I can go there, too. But I know what you do. You start with the ad hominem attacks so you can drag the conversation into the mud and have an excuse to dodge the information provided. It's not working with me anymore, and I'd appreciate it if you can keep the conversation above board. Told you this a bunch of times already.

            Schafer said, "I can't remember" or something to that affect because they obviously didn't want to cop to the 50/50 split. Bob Arum, who is also a promoter, on the other side, said there was a contract. Mayweather said there was a contract. And Kevin Iole, who is neutral, said there was a contract that he saw. That means one person from each side, and a neutral, said there was a contract. What do you think that means?

            There is no contract online because there is no contract online. How many contracts can you find online?

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by travestyny View Post

              You are constantly trying to drag conversations into the mud. You want to go back to 2016 now?


              I'm hip to your jive, man. I told all of you that if you want to go below the belt, I can go there, too. But I know what you do. You start with the ad hominem attacks so you can drag the conversation into the mud and have an excuse to dodge the information provided. It's not working with me anymore, and I'd appreciate it if you can keep the conversation above board. Told you this a bunch of times already.

              Schafer said, "I can't remember" or something to that affect because they obviously didn't want to cop to the 50/50 split. Bob Arum, who is also a promoter, on the other side, said there was a contract. Mayweather said there was a contract. And Kevin Iole, who is neutral, said there was a contract that he saw. That means one person from each side, and a neutral, said there was a contract. What do you think that means?

              There is no contract online because there is no contract online. How many contracts can you find online?
              Don’t gaslight me, that is you dragging discussions through the mud not me. Hence you’re always posing silly challenges in the ‘Dome and elsewhere. Argue for 400 pages on one thread! Beefing with countless members here. You stalked me on my PM’s and visitor messages when I refused to argue with you further and placed you on ignore. Now here you are again stirring drama.

              Paint this anyway you want, you already have your mind made up. You cherry pick who you want to believe based on your agenda. When people like Oscar and Lampley claim Floyd injected his hands for years you don’t believe them, but you believe Iole simply in his word and nothing more.

              Comment


              • #27
                Defo greatest living. Boxer

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

                  Don’t gaslight me, that is you dragging discussions through the mud not me. Hence you’re always posing silly challenges in the ‘Dome and elsewhere. Argue for 400 pages on one thread! Beefing with countless members here. You stalked me on my PM’s and visitor messages when I refused to argue with you further and placed you on ignore. Now here you are again stirring drama.
                  Tell me who has been constantly trying to drag this conversation into the mud and still won't stop? You're welcome to cut the bs at any time now.

                  Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
                  Paint this anyway you want, you already have your mind made up. You cherry pick who you want to believe based on your agenda. When people like Oscar and Lampley claim Floyd injected his hands for years you don’t believe them, but you believe Iole simply in his word and nothing more.
                  You keep making up things. Floyd did shoot his hands up with lidocaine in the past. No idea why you are deflecting to that, but it was discussed with Margaret Goodman during the preview of one of his fights. She was at the time a part of NSAC and obviously they didn't have an issue with it. I've never said he didn't use lidocaine, so who is "gaslighting."

                  And who is cherrypicking? As I stated, important players from all sides (right, left, and center) have acknowledged the contract. It's common sense. You choose one side because we both know you have a hard time handling the truth.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by travestyny View Post

                    Tell me who has been constantly trying to drag this conversation into the mud and still won't stop? You're welcome to cut the bs at any time now.



                    You keep making up things. Floyd did shoot his hands up with lidocaine in the past. No idea why you are deflecting to that, but it was discussed with Margaret Goodman during the preview of one of his fights. She was at the time a part of NSAC and obviously they didn't have an issue with it. I've never said he didn't use lidocaine, so who is "gaslighting."

                    And who is cherrypicking? As I stated, important players from all sides (right, left, and center) have acknowledged the contract. It's common sense. You choose one side because we both know you have a hard time handling the truth.
                    I said you would hijack it and you are doing just that.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

                      I said you would hijack it and you are doing just that.
                      You were the one engaged in discussing it before I was. I just joined in. So you are just as guilty, no?


                      In fact, you were the one who brought up the topic, so you shouldn't be upset if someone counters your claim. If you don't want to discuss it, then don't bring it up.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP