He stated flat out that he saw the contract. So you're saying you believe he is lying? The thing was so detailed that it talked about whose name would be on the posters first or something like that.
I just asked a simple question. Do you believe Pacquiao needed 24 days to recover from giving less than 2 tbsps of blood? If you don't want to answer, then don't answer.
Mayweather begged for the fight before his prison stint. Arum is on record saying Pac declined because he wanted to fight Marquez again, and that the Mayweather fight will always be there. You don't remember that? I'm sure I can jog your memory if you'd like, but I doubt you'd like me to because you'd rather dismiss any evidence and deflect to ad hominem attacks ("war of attrition"?) instead of looking at what really happened.
By the way, Bob Arum admits to the contract in the same article. So no "war of attrition" is needed to know that the talk of Mayweather sending the 50/50 split contract was real.
I just asked a simple question. Do you believe Pacquiao needed 24 days to recover from giving less than 2 tbsps of blood? If you don't want to answer, then don't answer.
Mayweather begged for the fight before his prison stint. Arum is on record saying Pac declined because he wanted to fight Marquez again, and that the Mayweather fight will always be there. You don't remember that? I'm sure I can jog your memory if you'd like, but I doubt you'd like me to because you'd rather dismiss any evidence and deflect to ad hominem attacks ("war of attrition"?) instead of looking at what really happened.
By the way, Bob Arum admits to the contract in the same article. So no "war of attrition" is needed to know that the talk of Mayweather sending the 50/50 split contract was real.
Comment