Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Duran the greatest fighter still alive today?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

    Fought no one when they were unbeaten? He took Leonard's "0". Took Davey Moore's too, and ruined him.
    Wow, showed me. One name worth mention and another never was. ooooooo that puts Spinks in his place it does. Ya jackoff.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post

      Wow, showed me. One name worth mention and another never was. ooooooo that puts Spinks in his place it does. Ya jackoff.
      What's up with the jackoff comment? Did I insult you? You're about the only person who shyts on Duran, so I'll take your comments for what they are worth.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by travestyny View Post

        Yea, because allegedly stalling a fight is on topic You couldn't let ShouldeRoll's opinion on topic about Mayweather go. You hijacked this thread but thanks to me, we have a venue to discuss it. You're welcome.
        Actually, I was discussing it with DeeMoney and yes, I responded to his comments on why he felt prime Floyd was better than prime Manny. Are you Shoulderrolls body guard now? Is not capable of speaking for himself? Or did you reply from the wrong alt account again? Like I said, you quoted me first and you've been doing this for four years now. Lost puppy following me around.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

          Actually, I was discussing it with DeeMoney and yes, I responded to his comments on why he felt prime Floyd was better than prime Manny. Are you Shoulderrolls body guard now? Is not capable of speaking for himself? Or did you reply from the wrong alt account again? Like I said, you quoted me first and you've been doing this for four years now. Lost puppy following me around.
          So what you're saying is that you hijacked the thread when you began discussing it with Dee Money? Ok


          Don't let it happen again then.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

            What's up with the jackoff comment? Did I insult you? You're about the only person who shyts on Duran, so I'll take your comments for what they are worth.
            Well if the laughy face didn't give it away I guess I'll hold yer hand, but, dude, you're the resident ********** here. Ought not cry over microaggression.

            I thought pointing out Davey, in this league of greatness, ain't **** worth mention and Ray is just one name that by the end of that line we were both on the same page; you need to bring more. I thought I was laughing at you with you. Because it's pretty obvious that's a **** response, but, I guess you're not very self aware and since it felt like quality you're just gonna pretend like it is? I dunno....I honestly have no ****ing clue why you'd be insulted.

            So I'll make it real simple, but Ray doe, is not an argument when dude has Holmes + doe. Ya jackoff


            Tell me you're ****ing with me or have some other point to make, don't tell me you feel insulted, actually insulted, by me calling you a jackoff. Don't ****ing tell me I can make you cry with "jackoff". I might agree with a lot of **** you say, but, I do respect you and I just don't see how I could anymore if you're the sort to actually be upset over some **** like that.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post

              Well if the laughy face didn't give it away I guess I'll hold yer hand, but, dude, you're the resident ********** here. Ought not cry over microaggression.

              I thought pointing out Davey, in this league of greatness, ain't **** worth mention and Ray is just one name that by the end of that line we were both on the same page; you need to bring more. I thought I was laughing at you with you. Because it's pretty obvious that's a **** response, but, I guess you're not very self aware and since it felt like quality you're just gonna pretend like it is? I dunno....I honestly have no ****ing clue why you'd be insulted.

              So I'll make it real simple, but Ray doe, is not an argument when dude has Holmes + doe. Ya jackoff


              Tell me you're ****ing with me or have some other point to make, don't tell me you feel insulted, actually insulted, by me calling you a jackoff. Don't ****ing tell me I can make you cry with "jackoff". I might agree with a lot of **** you say, but, I do respect you and I just don't see how I could anymore if you're the sort to actually be upset over some **** like that.
              I'm not a ********** for one, so thanks for that. If you're looking to cough up dirt, I can take it there but you're feelings are gonna get hurt. Lets keep it cordial, shall we? There's already enough mud-slinging and buffoonery to go around from other members.

              Moore was a hot prospect. He had much richer amateur pedigree than Canelo. Duran was the 5-2 underdog in that fight, whereas Mayweather was the 3-1 favorite for the Canelo fight. You can't be quick do dismiss Duran's win over Moore without dismissing Floyd's win over Canelo.

              Duran held 2 wins over DeJesus, and KO'd Cuevas. He became MW champ at age 37 or 38 against Barkley.

              If you're benchmark for greatness is defeating other undefeated fighters, Floyd only defeated 3, or 4 if you really want to count McGregor, or six if you count two others who were making their pro debut, ha! Manny defeated 9 of them. Spinks had a highly controversial win over Holmes, which I give him all the credit in the world, but then the Tyson haters come along and dismiss his win over Spinks because he was a natural LHW. Everyone has an axe to grind. But there certainly is a place for Spinks in the top 5 greatest living fighters today. He is one of the greatest LHWs without question.







              Comment


              • Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

                I'm not a ********** for one, so thanks for that. If you're looking to cough up dirt, I can take it there but you're feelings are gonna get hurt. Lets keep it cordial, shall we? There's already enough mud-slinging and buffoonery to go around from other members.

                Moore was a hot prospect. He had much richer amateur pedigree than Canelo. Duran was the 5-2 underdog in that fight, whereas Mayweather was the 3-1 favorite for the Canelo fight. You can't be quick do dismiss Duran's win over Moore without dismissing Floyd's win over Canelo.

                Duran held 2 wins over DeJesus, and KO'd Cuevas. He became MW champ at age 37 or 38 against Barkley.

                If you're benchmark for greatness is defeating other undefeated fighters, Floyd only defeated 3, or 4 if you really want to count McGregor, or six if you count two others who were making their pro debut, ha! Manny defeated 9 of them. Spinks had a highly controversial win over Holmes, which I give him all the credit in the world, but then the Tyson haters come along and dismiss his win over Spinks because he was a natural LHW. Everyone has an axe to grind. But there certainly is a place for Spinks in the top 5 greatest living fighters today. He is one of the greatest LHWs without question.






                Well, like I said, to me, I was being playful. If you're insulted all I can say to you is I legitimately think you're soft now, and, when you see a total lack of any form of banter that's because I am of the belief you are a candy ass who can't handle being called a jackoff let alone anything half witty or clever.

                Ya jackoff




                I think we all cut McNugget and any other debut for that matter. TBH, I have no clue how many debuts anyone but Fitzs fought.

                Canelo < Davey based on amateur career and projected outcomes? I'm not defending against that garbage, I'm just restating it in very base terms so you hopefully see the glaringly obvious yourself.

                No one said undefeated, and, everyone, every single person, defending against taking a good 0 always reverts to that. Always. It's a lame pivot that makes you too ****** to understand the difference between Wilder's 0s taken and Spink's 0s taken. I shouldn't have to explain the nuance every single ****ing time to people who in other situations will point out timing matters and taking out a great name while they are doing great is much better than Ali after the Park or some ******* who was projected to do well enough to one day be considered an ATG but never actually did.

                If you really want me to treat you like someone who is too slow to understand why being the first man to beat Holmes or Ray is waaay better than being a man to beat Holmes or the first to beat an undefeated fighter of lower caliber like Moore I'm more than happy to hold your slow candy ass hand and speak to you like as if you're a semi-******ed child, but, I'm pretty sure you understand the distinction fine and just have a real hard time drumming up an argument.

                Jackoff - I'm insulted

                Davey > Nelo because Davey was hyped

                Floyd only got 3


                No, I said it's a high accolade for a man who lost most of his big fights and didn't even make those fights when those fighters were at their most dangerous. That doesn't allude to floyd got more. That alludes to Duran having **** all else. You can say Ray a lot and that's it buddy. You don't want to compare champions beaten and **** like that, you want to pretend that since Duran's list of accomplishments is actually pretty short those are the criteria for greatness, but then again, acting like you're a ****** candy ass has been you motivation from the time you clicked quote on me.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post

                  Well, like I said, to me, I was being playful. If you're insulted all I can say to you is I legitimately think you're soft now, and, when you see a total lack of any form of banter that's because I am of the belief you are a candy ass who can't handle being called a jackoff let alone anything half witty or clever.

                  Ya jackoff




                  I think we all cut McNugget and any other debut for that matter. TBH, I have no clue how many debuts anyone but Fitzs fought.

                  Canelo < Davey based on amateur career and projected outcomes? I'm not defending against that garbage, I'm just restating it in very base terms so you hopefully see the glaringly obvious yourself.

                  No one said undefeated, and, everyone, every single person, defending against taking a good 0 always reverts to that. Always. It's a lame pivot that makes you too ****** to understand the difference between Wilder's 0s taken and Spink's 0s taken. I shouldn't have to explain the nuance every single ****ing time to people who in other situations will point out timing matters and taking out a great name while they are doing great is much better than Ali after the Park or some ******* who was projected to do well enough to one day be considered an ATG but never actually did.

                  If you really want me to treat you like someone who is too slow to understand why being the first man to beat Holmes or Ray is waaay better than being a man to beat Holmes or the first to beat an undefeated fighter of lower caliber like Moore I'm more than happy to hold your slow candy ass hand and speak to you like as if you're a semi-******ed child, but, I'm pretty sure you understand the distinction fine and just have a real hard time drumming up an argument.

                  Jackoff - I'm insulted

                  Davey > Nelo because Davey was hyped

                  Floyd only got 3


                  No, I said it's a high accolade for a man who lost most of his big fights and didn't even make those fights when those fighters were at their most dangerous. That doesn't allude to floyd got more. That alludes to Duran having **** all else. You can say Ray a lot and that's it buddy. You don't want to compare champions beaten and **** like that, you want to pretend that since Duran's list of accomplishments is actually pretty short those are the criteria for greatness, but then again, acting like you're a ****** candy ass has been you motivation from the time you clicked quote on me.
                  Your post looks like it was written by a pimple-faced 15 year old. Nothing new there.

                  Anyways, I would still rate a win over prime Leonard and handing him his first loss over a win against undefeated Holmes. Unless you're the only kid on the planet who ranks Holmes over Leonard. A win over 24 year old Moore is certainly as good or better than the win over a 22 year old Canelo. Remember, according to Floyd, Tank was "too young" at even 23 or 25 to fight Loma. Moore was the 154 champion and successfully defended his title three times before facing Duran. Duran was the 5-2 underdog, while Canelo was the 3-1 underdog.

                  billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post

                    He fought them two years after the rematch with Leonard. He was closer to his best when he fought them than Manny was when he fought Floyd. His lack of training discipline is what did him in, not his age.
                    Your opinion doesn't line up with mine, not a big deal

                    Comment


                    • Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP