Who's prime is more overrated ?

[Poet682006]

Your perception of reality and right and wrong is juvenile.

And if you can't understand that displaying multiple images of baby bottles in response to me pointing out your immaturity is illogical, then god help you.

Then to top that all off, your anger is not necessarily taken out on people who are idiots or nut hugging "fan-bois". You've gotten carried away to a point where anyone who vastly disagrees with you becomes an idiot or a fanboy. And if you can't find the flaw in that logic, once again, god help you.

Who's angry? I'm laughing my ass off at mental lightweights like you and Junior! I'm having a grand ol' time because making fun of morons is one of the simple pleasures in life. I LIKE slapping down nuthuggers. And hey! Anyone who thinks Tyson could have been "the best Heavyweight ever" (a position so laughable it shouldn't have to be explained) IS a nuthugging fan-boi who can't distinguish between their wistful fantasy and reality. Stifle the hero worship and get real.....dude.

Poet

[ironalex]

so you agree that tyson is more overrated due to his short carrer.

what are you argueing then? tyson vs louis? make a thread or is it tyson vs any decent heavy weight that poet can come up with? or do you just want poet to admit that tyson ewasnt a bum?

and for those 5 seconds yeah his hands speed was good how about his parrying and deflecting skills? how good is he at moving both hands at once blocking and attacking at the same time? sure louis couldnt punch as quickly but he could do alot of other things all at the same time his hands flowed together like a river. theres more then just punching when you consider hand speed

i orginally argued that neither of jones' and tysons' careers were ovverated, if would of taken my prev. advice which was "read". if you would of read properly, then i never said louis was better than tyson etc. "poet" said louis had faster hands, which i disagreed with. he also compared frazier saying he had similar headmovement, which i also disagreed with. in discussions generally people deviate off of topic. so stfu, and get off my d!k.

[Obama]

Who's angry? I'm laughing my ass off at mental lightweights like you and Junior! I'm having a grand ol' time because making fun of morons is one of the simple pleasures in life. I LIKE slapping down nuthuggers. And hey! Anyone who thinks Tyson could have been "the best Heavyweight ever" (a position so laughable it shouldn't have to be explained) IS a nuthugging fan-boi who can't distinguish between their wistful fantasy and reality. Stifle the hero worship and get real.....dude.

Poet

You continue to contradict yourself. You call me a mental lightweight, yet anyone sane reading this thread would consider you the mental lightweight between us.

And where did hero worship come from? Ad hominems are yet another sign of cognitive incapacities.

[Poet682006]

And where did hero worship come from? Ad hominems are yet another sign of cognitive incapacities.

Trying to defend an outrageous postion regarding a fighter is a sign of hero worshipping and first class nuthuggery.

Running around named after a Marxist is a clear sign of intellectual incapacitation. Try again Gilligan.

Poet

[Poet682006]

stfu, and get off my d!k.

Assuming he can find it. Prehaps a magnifying glass and tweezers might help? Assuming you actually HAVE one of course

Poet

[TheGreatA]

21 year old Joe Louis compared to 21 year old Mike Tyson:





21 year old Patterson:



22 year old Ali/Clay:

[Obama]

Trying to defend an outrageous postion regarding a fighter is a sign of hero worshipping and first class nuthuggery.

Running around named after a Marxist is a clear sign of intellectual incapacitation. Try again Gilligan.

Poet

If you up your vocabulary and actually comprehend things, and I might entertain our useless debates for my own personal enjoyment. At the moment however, you prove to be at an inferior intellectual level. So we're done here.

[Poet682006]

If you up your vocabulary and actually comprehend things, and I might entertain our useless debates for my own personal enjoyment. At the moment however, you prove to be at an inferior intellectual level. So we're done here.

Dude, you couldn't carry my intellectual jockstrap Now go ahead and ignore me before you hurt yourself Einstein

Poet

[ironalex]

Assuming he can find it. Prehaps a magnifying glass and tweezers might help? Assuming you actually HAVE one of course

Poet

i aint gonna lie...i find it str8 up creepy that an old man is conversing about my d ick....dont you old men have enough problems with your own? like for example the incapability of getting a hard on....i dont need no viagra....and for the record, my size more than satisfies every WOMAN (not no man, coz i dont have **** tendicies like you of course)

[Poet682006]

i aint gonna lie...i find it str8 up creepy that an old man is conversing about my d ick....dont you old men have enough problems with your own? like for example the incapability of getting a hard on....i dont need no viagra....and for the record, my size more than satisfies every WOMAN (not no man, coz i dont have **** tendicies like you of course)

I find it more than a little bit creepy that a snot nosed 19 year old brought up his d1ck in the first place on a BOXING forum of all all places. Don't wan't your lack of endowment laughed at? Then don't bring your genatalia into the convo in the first place

Poet