I like to think I have a decent grasp of pro boxing and its history. Unfortunetly I am not so confident in my knowledge of Amatuer stars, especially ones who for various reasons never went pro.
John Scully put up a bunch of links on the NSB board of amatuer fights and I was watching some of Teofilo Stevenson's and Felix Savon's fights. Both of these guys were stars in the amatuer ranks and speculated upon as to how they would of done as pro's.
My question of course is 1, how would they have fared had they been allowed to fight professionaly? 2, who would have been the better pro? Both defeated a laundry list of top professionals in the amatuers. Would they have progressed to be top pro's? And 3, who who have won a head to head match up? I think popular opinion will say Stevenson. But Savon was nothing to sneeze at and just as dominant an amatuer, if not more so.
Educate me.
John Scully put up a bunch of links on the NSB board of amatuer fights and I was watching some of Teofilo Stevenson's and Felix Savon's fights. Both of these guys were stars in the amatuer ranks and speculated upon as to how they would of done as pro's.
My question of course is 1, how would they have fared had they been allowed to fight professionaly? 2, who would have been the better pro? Both defeated a laundry list of top professionals in the amatuers. Would they have progressed to be top pro's? And 3, who who have won a head to head match up? I think popular opinion will say Stevenson. But Savon was nothing to sneeze at and just as dominant an amatuer, if not more so.
Educate me.
Comment