Originally posted by LondonRingRules
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PRIME Ali Beats PRIME Tyson Easy?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by 0Rooster4Life0 View PostThe fact you say you watch the fight everyday show's you are a Tyson ass kisser, I see it how it is, and for you to say He didnt land jabs means your a fool. Biggs isnt even a good fighter, and for the first round he showed Tyson up, Tyson is a Good fighter, but people like you that cant see his weaknesses are just people that refuse the fact that a prime tyson is beatable, I wasnt saying that Biggs would beat him or Holmes, i was GIVE AN EXAMPLE, that Tyson has trouble against Boxers that move around, And a PRIME Ali was the Best At that, a 38 year old Larry Holmes showed us in the first 20 secs of the 4th round that Tyson is easy to jab, 90% of thos jabs landed solid, Count how many times Tyson Landed a clean punch in those two highlights, ALI Would have out boxed Tyson,.
Tyson is good,
But Ali is Great
Stop kissing ass, and watch more fighter instead of watching Tyson Vs Biggs everyday you moron
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostLol, I gotta say, I love your ornery disposition when describing things you don't agree with. Not saying I don't see the logic behind many of your posts, but damn, agree or disagree your posts are entertaining. Keep em coming.
Poet
Comment
-
Originally posted by La_Vibora View PostAs I have said many times before, you have to add the Cus factor in here. If Cus is alive for this fight, I think Mike would have an excellent chance to win. Cus knew Ali's style very well and he was so confindent in knowing that he could get a defeat over Ali that he was planning on getting Jose Torres to move up to heavyweight to fight Ali. Also, lets not forget about this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrWlHDYDkjg
I believe that Cus would have had Tyson prepared to defeat Ali, just like with Larry Holmes. Tyson is the only man to knock out Holmes for a reason, in addition to Larry obviously being past his best, Mike and Cus used to analyze Larry Holmes' every move since Tyson was an amatuer because they assumed that Larry would still be champ by the time Mike came up the ranks/ They would have been prepared for Ali imo. With that said though, I think Ali would pull out a decision(if it were going 15), but I wouldn't be surprised to see Mike pull out a victory either.
There's way to much playing of the "If only....." game with Tyson. I know of no other fighter that consistantly pulls that kind of wishful thinking. Tyson was the only fighter ever to have negative **** impact his career? Please.
What if.....
Jack Johnson hadn't been pursued by the government?
Joe Louis hadn't lost 4 years off his prime due to WWII?
Sonny Liston had gotten his title shot while still in prime?
Ali hadn't lost 3 years off his prime due to his being banned?
You can play this game with almost any fighter. In Tyson's case people really need to get a clue and dump the non-stop wishful thinking. Face it, no matter how many ifs and buts you dream and wish for you won't make Tyson into something he wasn't: That is anything close to being the best ever.
Poet
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostPeople put WAY to much stock in D'Amato and his ability to make Tyson better than he was. It's not like Kevin Rooney was chopped liver afterall. These same people then, in turn overrate ROONEY'S ability to make Tyson better than he was when comparing him pre and post the first Bruno fight. Get real people: A trainer has only so much impact on a fighter and ultimately a fighter enters the ring alone.
There's way to much playing of the "If only....." game with Tyson. I know of no other fighter that consistantly pulls that kind of wishful thinking. Tyson was the only fighter ever to have negative **** impact his career? Please.
What if.....
Jack Johnson hadn't been pursued by the government?
Joe Louis hadn't lost 4 years off his prime due to WWII?
Sonny Liston had gotten his title shot while still in prime?
Ali hadn't lost 3 years off his prime due to his being banned?
You can play this game with almost any fighter. In Tyson's case people really need to get a clue and dump the non-stop wishful thinking. Face it, no matter how many ifs and buts you dream and wish for you won't make Tyson into something he wasn't: That is anything close to being the best ever.
Poet
That said, Ali takes him UD 3 out of 3 even with Cus.Last edited by res; 02-13-2009, 12:56 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by La_Vibora View Post
Comment
-
If Ali had problems with Joe Frazier than he would have similair problems with a young and focused Mike Tyson. Im talking the Tyson of 1987 when he was motivated and his reflexes were at its peak. That Tyson is much quicker than Joe Frazier.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RayLeonard82 View PostIf Ali had problems with Joe Frazier than he would have similair problems with a young and focused Mike Tyson. Im talking the Tyson of 1987 when he was motivated and his reflexes were at its peak. That Tyson is much quicker than Joe Frazier.
Originally posted by 4736294The fact that they don't fight the same is important. Frazier applied pressure but it was brawling pressure that included persistent attacks to the body. Tyson usually tries to land one or two shots, with speed (not by brawling) and usually to the head. That isn't a good approach to fighting Ali.
So i don't think this fight would be as hard for Ali as Frazier, but it still won't be a cake walk.
Comment
-
Originally posted by a-raines21 View Postdude do you not see greatness in tyson?
His combination of strength and speed made him a great puncher, but I'm afraid I don't see any other signs of greatness in him. His 'prime' was pathetically brief, he had no ring savvy to speak of, he had no dedication or heart, he was totally annihilated by the likes of Douglas, Holyfield, Lewis, Williams, McBride..
Comment
Comment