.....CD-JP......
rd1:10-9
rd2:9-10
rd3:9-10
rd4:9-10
rd5:10-9 this was close, could go either way
rd6:10-9
rd7:10-9 besides that flashy punch that people thought hurt dawson(which i think didn't) and the crazy flurry that missed just about everypunch, i gave it to chad
rd8:9-10 it was dawson all through the round till pascal nearly took him out and since the purpose of the game is damage, pascal takes it
rd9:9-10 close round, both fighters hurt, chad probabley landed more, but pascal did more damage
rd10:10-9 besides a late rally which consisted of 5 bodyshots, a low blow and a rabbit punch, dawson clearly
rd11:10-9 dawson without a doubt, pascal hurt 3 times, ready to go down, could've been an 10-8 round, we'll never know
post yours
:haha:
1. Pascal
2. Pascal
3. Pascal
4. Dawson
5. Pascal
6. Dawson
7. Pascal
8. Pascal
9. Pascal
10. Pascal
11. Dawson till stoppage
Dawson was losing, no question in my mind.
I don't think he lost because anything Pascal did, he lost because he just wouldn't throw punches, put punches together, and just take control of the fight.
100% agree...
And he didn't follow up everytime he could've, and stopped putting pressure on P.
Didn't understand it at all.
I'd rather say that D. lost than P. won the fight.
Maybe he underestimated P's speed, pop and unorthodox way of 'jumpin' on him' and was scared to follow. Just an impression that I jhad...
Pac would start off with a lot of devastating body-combos.
You can't shoulder roll or duck your body. M. could straight away move backwards, but that's just when you start to lose, when facing Manny.
All of that "body-wizardy" would slow down Floyd, and as I guess he'd be floored in round 5 or 6 for the first time.
M would be as well as outworked, as outclassed, as outpunched by Pacquiao, for sure, because he hasn't the punch to impress Manny, at all.
And that's the main aspect about being able to beat P.