A very revisionist take.
Personally, and I know I was not alone, I doubted Spence was the same fighter as he was before his TWO car crashes. Yes he beat Ugas and looked decent enough doing it but even so ... and I sure as hell knew he wasn't in his prime at 33 years old - very few fighters are, but especially those who have not looked after themselves - and drinking and partying and then bouncing on your head down the highway at 100mph doesn't really cut it in the 'looking after yourself' stakes.
And then you had that 'rabbit in headlights' stare as he made his ring-walk - didn't want to be there.
Still, it's 3 years now by the time he fights Timmy or whoever else. That's enough time for most of his issues to have improved - well maybe not the partying, the too-long Texas drawl and major head trauma. Quite a few of these fights come down to who is least damaged has the better chance - we'll see soon enough
Similar verson of this was used as excuse by Crawford detractors to lessen his win. Were you supporting Spence?