To me it looks like you're the one moaning son.
Truth. These GGG haters love to make fun of any GGG fans and they love patting eachother on the back when they come up with new clever insults(triple asswipe, ducklovkin,gggstring, bumlovkin,or the cheesiest of all gggoldilocks ). Just look at the first 4 or 5 replies in this thread. Just a bash session. What makes you think GGG fans don't want the Ward/Kov fight to happen? Just because a couple stupid people may have said something like that, do you honestly believe most of the fans who enjoy watching GGG are against that fight? I love to watch GGG and I'm very excited for Ward vs Kovalev. How often do we get get two guys who are both top 5 pound for pound fighting eachother in their prime? What is there for anyone to complain about? It almost seems that this thread was created as another avenue to bash GGG or anyone who likes him. I like GGG just as I like many other fighters. For some reason, many of the haters seem to put everything he does, every comment he makes, every dumb comment by his dumb trainer, every comment from his Promotor, under a microscope. Sure he has made a few bad decisions, made some hypocritical comments, and his trainer is a shameless fire starter, but he is hardly unique as far as those things go. He obviously is a very talented and very exciting fighter. He has cleaned out his division and has knocked out like 22 straight opponents! Middleweight certainly isn't a stacked division we all realize that but who else in recent history has mowed opponents down like that? Before anyone says "it's easy to KO bums", well he is knocking out former champs and top 10 or top 5 middleweights. Geale was a top 5 and had never been KOd I don't think. Murray was top 10 and is a big strong middleweight who woulda been champ if he wasn't robbed. Lemieux was IBF champ, Stevens is a quality tough fighter, Rosado is a tough fighter and was on a 7 fight win streak and was mandatory for IBF title and he woulda beat Bundrage so Rosado could easily have been a champ at JM we all know how tough he is, Macklin is a tough contender who should've been a world champ but was robbed by Sturm. Even Rubio offers some insight to GGGs skill and power. Look at how long he lasted with Chavez Jr and Pavlik, compared to GGG. So I really think people get a bit carried away calling all GGGs opponents bums. Anyways my main point is that it seems like a lot of people put GGG and his trainers dumb comments under a big microscope without giving that same treatment to other popular current fighters
Lmao. Vanes = ~top10 fighter with 3 losses = world class. All the top10 fighters Golovkin fought = tomato cans.
Did you just call top 10 fighters tomato cans? Top 10 in the world in their division and they're tomato cans? Jesus, the middleweight division certainly isn't loaded right now, but some delusional fight fans on here throw around terms like "tomato cans/bums/cowards" way too often. In what reality can you call a fighter who is ranked in the top 10 out of the perhaps thousands of active fighters in a given division, tomato cans? Its the comical babble of some dufus behind a keyboard. Tomato cans/bums should be used to talk about the opponents we see very early in most fighters careers on boxrec. I'm referring to the fighters who usually have no photo on their boxrec page, usually have a losing record, rarely if ever fight outside their home country, and who's sole purpose is to serve as canon fodder for young fighters/prospects. That is a genuine tomato can/bum. I wouldn't even extend the term tomato can/bum to fighters we refer to as "gatekeepers". For a fighter to have become a gate keeper, he has at least the talent/ tools to be a worthwhile opponent in a given division. That's not a bum or tomato can. Gabe Rosado is not a tomato can. David Lemieux is not a tomato can. Martin Murray is not a tomato can. Just because a guy isn't a hall of famer or an "elite fighter" doesn't mean he's a bum. There's many levels between. And to be ranked in the top 10 in the world in your given division means your many levels above being a bum
All Gabe has to do is keep losing and he gets big matchups. Talk about a twisted recipe.
Dude he won his last 2 fights. He beat Clottey and his last fight was I think against Gutierrez and he won that one too, although he barely squeaked it out IMO. Before those fights he did have like a 4 or 5 fight losing streak but there should be a big asterisk next to that streak. He knocked out Brian Vera in BKB but that doesn't get counted but whatever, he also was robbed of a win against J'leon Love. And that losing streak, with the exception of Charlo, came against world champs and were stopped on cuts. He was putting up a great fight against Quillin, seemed to be peaking in the second half of the fight and momentum was swinging in his favor when the doc stopped it on cuts. He fought Lemieux basically with one eye from the second round on. All in all, yes he had a losing streak goin but he was facing world champions and got some tough breaks. And his performances gained him fans in spite of him not getting the win. He is exciting and has a ton of heart and a lot of fight fans enjoy watching/rooting for him. And he has won his last two fights, so I'll be happy for him if he gets a shot at Saunders. I see Rosado as being a very live underdog if that fight happens. Saunders doesn't have the power of GGG/Quillin/Lemieux so I don't see him tearing up Rosados face like those guys did. And I certainly don't see Saunders stopping Rosado. I'd certainly be intrigued to see how it played out
Most Haymon fighters can fight anywhere they want. They're obviously going to go to where the most money is.
All i see is excuses, excuses, excuses. That's all Lil Gina's post EXCUSES.
For someone who hates Golovkin and his fans, you sure seem to love to spend time posting over and over about him and his fans. You seem to have some sort of jealousy complex toward Golovkin. Like you cannot stand the attention he gets. That's the vibe I get from your posts in this thread as well as other posters who appear in Golovkin related threads over and over saying the same things in different ways. Using phrases like "Lil ginas, ducklovkin, GGGoldilocks" etc. I'll bet you have a big ***** eating grin on your face each time you type "lil ginas", just thinking to yourself how clever you are to have come up with such a funny term. I figure that's why you make sure to fit your clever term in every Golovkin related post you make. I enjoy watching GGG fight just like I enjoy watching many other fighters. I certainly wouldn't include myself as a member of any fighters fan club and I don't try to constantly defend the actions of any particular fighter. But I also don't have a complex about any fighters that would cause me to spend a lot of time trashing that fighter in every thread involving them and engaging fans of that fighter in repetitive debates
Are you kidding, Ca$hnelo? I guess nobody has told you that Little G has knocked out a murderer's row of fighters in Marco Antonio Rubio, Dominic Wade, Willie Monroe Jr., etc., :boxing:. All household names that even casual boxing fans know.
I like Golovkin and Canelo first of all. But you and Canelo can try and change the subject all you want, people can tell what's what. The simple fact is that if Golovkin was nothin special as you and Canelo suggest, Canelo would never have dropped the belt to avoid him. If Golivkin was truly nothing special, Canelo would jump at the chance to expose him and take all of Golovkins fans as well as the buzz around Golovkins name for himself. You can't have it both ways. If he wasn't anything special Canelo woulda fought him, especially with all the fans and attention Golovkin has generated over the last year or two. On the other hand, if Golovkin truly is the beast so many believe him to be, that would be a reason Canelo would vacate and go back to 154. You don't drop the WBC belt to avoid a guy who is nothin special, especially when that guy has been the subject of so much attention in the boxing world and gaining popularity with each fight. If he was nothin special, then he would be much too appetizing as an opponent for Canelo n Golden Boy to pass up. But you know this. I know this. We all know this. You and Canelo both insult our intelligence by trying to change the subject or shift our attention away from the obvious truth. As if trashing Golovkins recent opponents does anything to change the obvious fact that Canelo vacated to avoid fighting him. I wonder why he would do such a thing. Clearly it must be because Golovkin is nothing special. As an impartial fan of both fighters and a fan of boxing in general, I find these type of statements hilarious. Does Canelo honestly expect anyone to believe that he just vacated for no reason?
All anyone can do is form an opinion on the information (or lack of) available.
If they had tried to get a DeGale fight i think we would have heard about it by now because of the backlash from picking a WW.
He approached Haymon about ALL his fighters, Lil Gina's keep acting like they wanted to negotiate a Lara fight.
I told you not go on the word of Di Bella because he doesn't know about Lara but you wanted to run with it to defend Lil G. Who was right?
You need to get a life. You know WAY too much about all this for someone who claims to hate Golovkin and "lil ginas". All these he said she said dumbazz arguments about Loeffler and Hearn and Lara's management blah blah blah get a life dude. You hate Golovkin. Why not spend your valuable time talking about a fighter you like? I don't get how you can dislike a fighter and his fans so much then constantly wanna talk about that fighter and have dumbazz little arguments with his fans. Seems like you are jealous of all the attention Golovkin gets. It's become more and more obvious as I continue to see post after post after post by you in Golovkin related threads. Well, have fun with that