pac's resume >>> floyd's
if you think pac has an overrated resume, imagine floyd's
Are you honestly comparing Pac to Floyd?
Floyd has beaten the likes of Castillo, Corrales, Hatton and De la hoya(when they were still world class fighters and not the bums Pac faught). Floyd has never ever lost but also has never been knocked down.
Next time you compare someone to Floyd it better be Sugar Ray or Ali.
was hatton a bum before or after floyd beat him?
joe calzhage > pbf . if you keep bringing the "never lost" card
Hatton after floyd was no longer a world class fighter and when he faught Pac he was more or less a bum.
Calslappy never beat any world class fighter, beat a potentialy world class fighter in Lacy. A win over Hopkins was a poor one as only by split decison and then ducked a rematch. A win over RJJ has no credit bar the name.
Then you have a win over Eubank who was over the hill. The only other majour win he has is over Kessler who is hardly hall of fame worthy. I have ''never lost'' a fight but thats due to me not fighting noteworthy opposition.
Mayweather has a resume to be proud of and has never been knocked down so that is why he is the greatest.
David haye would easily beat Ali, Foreman, Tyson, and Frazier if they were to fight now.
Beating over the hill fighters does not merit hall of the fame status.
Ricky Hatton is not good enough for the top pound for pound superstars. The way in which he was beaten by Pac and PBF show that he doesnt have the skills to compete at the highest level. Hatton is not in Marquezs class.
Khan on the other hand has shown he has what it takes to compete with the likes of Marquez. A fight against maidiana would probably end up like the Salita did and also Maidiana is not a big enough name for Khan to fight. Marquez will be more of a challenge but Khan will be to quick for him.