Back in his era, he was. But he also didn't fight with gloves most of the time. And those gloves weren't padded like they are now or even since the 50s. Louis was the first to punch exceptionally hard.
The thing about Tyson, is that he is 2nd in hardest punching (my opinion now). But for every punch Shavers and Foreman threw, Tyson threw two or three. Causing at least twice as damage as Shavers or Foreman. He was also a more accurate puncher. There is a debate that Joe Louis was the best puncher, and Ray Robinson P4P. But I think Tyson eclipses both of them. Easily.
I'm surprised only 6 have chose Shavers. Of course I picked Tyson, but I would change my vote now.
Some people say Tua punched harder, but that is a load of shit. What do you think?
(Excuse my language, if you're offended.)
For old timers, the hardest puncher, in my opinion, was Jack Dempsey, James Jefferies, and Jack Johnson. Sullivan also.
P4P, its Fitzsimmons, and now I know Jose, Ketchell who knocked down Johnson, but then got knocked unconcious by Jack.
Now lets get some votes! :)
I mean in their prime, who punched the hardest and p4p. Even though it showed how hard Foreman still punched, it wasn't close to as hard as he could punch in his prime.
I guess then that since so many pros said Shavers was the hardest puncher. I would say he is too. Then Tyson then Foreman. I can't argue against the pros.
M26, where did you see that Holmes said Shavers punched harder than Tyson. I remember Holmes saying that when people say he punched the hardest, he wouldn't argue. But where did you see him say suttin about Tyson?