Who had a better run of title defences Gennady Golovkin or Joe Calzaghe?

GGG. Easy. Calslappy, what did he do at 168?

Let’s be honest Carl Froch had a much better resume of opponents than the bum-killer Calslappy. And he fought them Overseas unlike the Welsh slapper.

Golovkin by a mile. Calslappy was fighting every bum he could find for a decade. He even fought the same bum twice.

well the rules of boxing clearly state no hitting with the inside of the glove or wrist which is largely what he did to generate his great "hand speed" in a side to side motion instead of the proper forward and back motion but yeah its not legal but then again its not enforced. i have only seen robin reid penalized for hitting with the inside of the glove but that was against sven ottke so they could rob reid and i dont think reid was even doing it. So every unorthodox fighter hits with the inside of the glove?

Yeah I know. I answered the question Perhaps you didn't read the question right - Who had a better run of title defences Gennady Golovkin at 160 or Joe Calzaghe at 168? Hopkins was 43 years old at 175. Jones was also at 175 and 39 years old, after getting KO'd by Glen Johnson & Antonio Tarver in 2 rounds. We're discussing 168 and 160 respectively.

Yeah I know. I answered the question you did?

I get it if one likes exemplary boxing, it's understandable. I have always liked the twisted-style boxers more. As long as they fight by the rules, big bravo for being so unorthodox, but successful. well the rules of boxing clearly state no hitting with the inside of the glove or wrist which is largely what he did to generate his great "hand speed" in a side to side motion instead of the proper forward and back motion but yeah its not legal but then again its not enforced. i have only seen robin reid penalized for hitting with the inside of the glove but that was against sven ottke so they could rob reid and i dont think reid was even doing it.

and those fights were at 168? This is exactly what I'm thinking.

Calzaghe has the ugliest boxing style known to man. He fights like a hairhatted hooligan. this is why nobody even wants to watch a documentary on him. Any highlight footage just discredits the sport of boxing. Him and Andre Ward are black eyes to the sport of boxing I get it if one likes exemplary boxing, it's understandable. I have always liked the twisted-style boxers more. As long as they fight by the rules, big bravo for being so unorthodox, but successful.

Golovkin for me. Aside from the Mitchell fight, I don’t think I’ve ever watched a Calzaghe defence back pre-Lacy. in fairness or unfairness to calzaghe the wbo wasnt really seen as one of the major belts until the early 2000's so half his "reign" is disputed. wbo was like the ibo or some crap now and in retrospect it shouldnt have been seen as legit but here we are. most of his title defenses especially early on his career were just laughable bum fests or bums on parade if you will. even the name guys he fought were always coming off recent losses: reid lost to malinga, had 1 tuneup then fought calzaghe. woodhall lost to beyer, had 1 tune up then fought calzaghe. brewer got ko'd by echols, had 1 fight then fought calzaghe. mitchell lost to ottke, then fought calzaghe. and those are the best guys he fought until lacy, bika, and kessler partially redeemed him at the end of his career.

Calzaghe has the ugliest boxing style known to man. He fights like a hairhatted hooligan. this is why nobody even wants to watch a documentary on him. Any highlight footage just discredits the sport of boxing. Him and Andre Ward are black eyes to the sport of boxing

Golovkin for me. Aside from the Mitchell fight, I don’t think I’ve ever watched a Calzaghe defence back pre-Lacy.

Calzaghe, he beat tf outta drug cheats like bhop and roid Jones and those fights were at 168?