It seems that it is viewed as a negative trait when a boxer is "basic". Why is that the case? What is wrong with being solid in all areas but not spectacular in one particular. I look at Haney and see no areas where he excels but some how he gets the job done. Should we show more appreciation for basic fighters?
I'm not a big fan of Haney, hes mostly boring and lacks power. But YDKSAB if you think Haney is basic.
His footwork alone is world class. No need to mention defense, ring generalship, counter punching.
:rolleyes: