Canelo fans and mexcian fans turned into mayweather fans

Why fight munguia? Canelo vs Munguia looks like it's the next fight. WBO Mandatory. Canelo fights mandatories now :lol1:

Bet on it. After he fights Munguia. Why fight munguia?

If canelo fights Jermall after that garbage performance then that is a blatant duck of David Bet on it. After he fights Munguia.

wtf kovalev could box, punch, was still prime and divisions higher. who was floyd fighting the likes of victor ortiz a guy who couldn't keep his hands up You have a warped view of what someones prime is :lol1:

I think the cash cow does always had multiple people wanting to fight him so in essence he does have his choice. The choice made should reflect what fans want whenever possible. The problem with both Floyd and Canelo is they are usually only fighting 2x a year. Can’t get to everyone with such limited activity. People are always going to call out when fighters get the shot that they don't deserve. Was anyone on the PLANET asking for Jermell/Canelo? Canelo famously says he does what he wants, nobody tells him who to fight, he'll bin a belt if the WBC tells him to face GGG, but then his fans will turn around and say "Welp, gotta fight Yildrim. He's mandatory. Ryder earned it! He's mandatory! Morell? He shouldn't be mandatory, go fight more people. Benavidez? He shouldn't be mandatory, go earn it."

If canelo fights Jermall after that garbage performance then that is a blatant duck of David

“One of the restaurants that Canelo reported is backed up by a picture of that dinner where Bill Clinton, the former President of the USA, and Carlos Slim are with him in Sonora Grill restaurant,” Sulaiman responded. “We have the real receipt of that dinner. Canelo ate that night there, and he ate there another night before he went to training camp.” https://boxingnewsonline.net/canelo-...aminated-meat/ Providing something like that is more believable than providing nothing like Conor Benn. Who still hasn’t cleared up his situation with the British Boxing Board of Control to this day. Acknowledge it and take your L, Dan. Ok and is there any food on the table in that picture? No, there isn’t. So saying there is a picture of him eating with Bill Clinton is a lie from you. Ok, provide these supposed receipts. And even after you do that, there is still zero evidence that anything eaten there was contaminated regardless. I can’t explain to you any more clear how none of the above is either plausible, or believable. Now, for the 6th time, are you going to justify your stance with Ngannou is assuredly on PEDs whilst Floyd was clean? Or are you going to keep ducking it?

“One of the restaurants that Canelo reported is backed up by a picture of that dinner where Bill Clinton, the former President of the USA, and Carlos Slim are with him in Sonora Grill restaurant,” Sulaiman responded. “We have the real receipt of that dinner. Canelo ate that night there, and he ate there another night before he went to training camp.” https://boxingnewsonline.net/canelo-...aminated-meat/ Providing something like that is more believable than providing nothing like Conor Benn. Who still hasn’t cleared up his situation with the British Boxing Board of Control to this day. Acknowledge it and take your L, Dan.

You can’t really be this stupid. Canelo put forward 8 places that he ate at in Mexico, including the Sonora Grill twice. Where he was seen having steak with Bill Clinton. He even provided receipts to the WBC. And it’s a fact that clenbuterol use is common in Mexican cattle. Is that enough to prove his case 100%? Not necessarily, one would have to look at the dates and the items in his receipts to be certain of what he ate. But if he did indeed eat meat then it is certainly possible that the trace amounts of clen found in his system might have come from that. What Canelo has provided in support of his excuse is far more than what Conor Benn has provided…no sources for the tainted eggs, he wasn’t seen in public at any such source, no receipts, and the UK prohibits clomiphene use in egg production. Hence Canelo’s story (whether true or not) has more believability surrounding it than Benn’s. It’s really simple to understand, Dan. But if you can’t even acknowledge this much then there is no point in discussing anything else with a thick cvnt like you. You’ll keep insisting that 2+2=5 all day like a retard no matter what. Go eat your crayons. You can keep repeating the same crap over and over again it doesn’t make it any more true. No he was not “Seen eating steak with Bill Clinton” first and foremost. Secondly, even if he was, that has no bearing on whether it was contaminated or not. Canelo can put forward 100000000000 restaurants he ate at; IT IS IRRELEVANT. Him claiming he did something is irrelevant #1, #2 again even if that were true (which we don’t know) it has no bearing on what he ate when he was there, and if anything he ate was contaminated. You again repeat “If he ate meat then it’s possible” nonsense that means NOTHING. Yes, IF he ate meat it MIGHT have been contaminated. That’s no different than saying IF he slipped on a banana peel and landed on a needle of Clen unknowingly that might be the reason. It’s irrelevant because both have ZERO evidence for being true. I CANNOT MAKE THAT EASIER FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND. There is precisely, ZERO demonstrable evidence that Canelo failed his test due to contaminated meat. ZERO. So, by the literal definition of plausible, his explanation is no more plausible than ANYONE who has ever claimed that they failed their test due to contamination and that includes Conor Benn. Conor Benn could have eaten contaminated eggs, that isn’t outside the realms of possibility. He could have taken a contaminated supplement, that’s not out of the realms of possibility either. What’s “possible” is not relevant, what’s relevant is what’s provable. Both Canelo and Benn have entirely zero evidence to support their claims so by definition, the plausibility of both being true are the same; Zero. I can’t make that easier for you to understand. Now, for the 5th time, are you going to justify your stance that Ngannou is “assuredly” on PED’s, whilst Floyd is clean? Or are you going to continue to duck the question?

I’ve already explained to you ad nauseam why none of what you’ve said here has any bearing on evidence to support this explanation. Canelo SAYING he ate meat in Mexico - Irrelevant. There is no evidence that he did. Canelo SAYING that he ate at several restaurants in Mexico - Irrelevant. #1 we don’t know if that’s true and #2 we don’t know what he ate while he was there. Canelo being pictured at a Steakhouse (with no food on the table) - Irrelevant. You have no idea what he ate while he was there or if he even ate anything at all. None of the above supports his explanation in any way. Hence why there is zero evidence to support it, and hence why his explanation is no more believable than any other fighter I named. 0 is the same as 0. And everyone listed has 0 evidence to support their claims, including Canelo. I’m not going to continue to break this down so a child can understand because you don’t understand how the burden of proof works. You have it in your head that Canelo has a plausible explanation for his failed drug test when he objectively does not. That isn’t an opinion. That’s a literal fact. There is no difference in the plausibility of Canelo’s “contamination” excuse than and other fighter that has ever claimed contamination. All are at entirely zero. So let’s leave that to one side because your double standard and just general idiocy on the subject is clear for everyone to see to the point you’re a genuine laughing stock. So more importantly; Are you going to justify your stance that Ngannou is “ assuredly “ on PEDs whilst Floyd is clean? Or are you going to continue avoid the question like the spineless coward you are? You can’t really be this stupid. Canelo put forward 8 places that he ate at in Mexico, including the Sonora Grill twice. Where he was seen having steak with Bill Clinton. He even provided receipts to the WBC. And it’s a fact that clenbuterol use is common in Mexican cattle. Is that enough to prove his case 100%? Not necessarily, one would have to look at the dates and the items in his receipts to be certain of what he ate. But if he did indeed eat meat then it is certainly possible that the trace amounts of clen found in his system might have come from that. What Canelo has provided in support of his excuse is far more than what Conor Benn has provided…no sources for the tainted eggs, he wasn’t seen in public at any such source, no receipts, and the UK prohibits clomiphene use in egg production. Hence Canelo’s story (whether true or not) has more believability surrounding it than Benn’s. It’s really simple to understand, Dan. But if you can’t even acknowledge this much then there is no point in discussing anything else with a thick cvnt like you. You’ll keep insisting that 2+2=5 all day like a retard no matter what. Go eat your crayons.

Wrong Dan. Canelo said he ate tainted meat in Mexico, which does have a known issue with clenbuterol use in its cattle industry. He also gave the names of several restaurants he ate at in Mexico, and was even photographed in public at a table at the Sonora Grill steakhouse. Is that 100% proof that his explanation was true? No, but it’s consistent with what he claimed and at least gives information to analyze and sort through and debate. Conor Benn on the other hand offered fvck all. And unlike Mexico with clenbuterol, UK farmers CANNOT use clomiphene to produce eggs on British soil. There are clear and very obvious differences between the two situations. Even a moron can see it. But asking you to have the intelligence of a moron has proven to be a lost cause. I’ve already explained to you ad nauseam why none of what you’ve said here has any bearing on evidence to support this explanation. Canelo SAYING he ate meat in Mexico - Irrelevant. There is no evidence that he did. Canelo SAYING that he ate at several restaurants in Mexico - Irrelevant. #1 we don’t know if that’s true and #2 we don’t know what he ate while he was there. Canelo being pictured at a Steakhouse (with no food on the table) - Irrelevant. You have no idea what he ate while he was there or if he even ate anything at all. None of the above supports his explanation in any way. Hence why there is zero evidence to support it, and hence why his explanation is no more believable than any other fighter I named. 0 is the same as 0. And everyone listed has 0 evidence to support their claims, including Canelo. I’m not going to continue to break this down so a child can understand because you don’t understand how the burden of proof works. You have it in your head that Canelo has a plausible explanation for his failed drug test when he objectively does not. That isn’t an opinion. That’s a literal fact. There is no difference in the plausibility of Canelo’s “contamination” excuse than and other fighter that has ever claimed contamination. All are at entirely zero. So let’s leave that to one side because your double standard and just general idiocy on the subject is clear for everyone to see to the point you’re a genuine laughing stock. So more importantly; Are you going to justify your stance that Ngannou is “ assuredly “ on PEDs whilst Floyd is clean? Or are you going to continue avoid the question like the spineless coward you are?

Except what you still can’t grasp is Canelo’s explanation is not believable what so ever because there is no evidence to back up anything he said in his explanation. You can insert ANY fighter that has failed a drug test and insert their excuse and deem it “believable”. Literally any of them outside of rare cases like Jarrel Miller where he’s been caught with things that has no chance of being detected by contamination. But without evidence then their explanation is not believable I.e Canelo, Conor Benn, Dillian Whyte, Lucas Browne, James Toney etc etc etc etc Hence why Conor Benn and Canelo’s situations are ni different than one another. Both claim contamination, both have ZERO evidence to support that claim. I legitimately can’t make this easier to understand. That said, the above is irrelevant. Justify your stance than Ngannou is “assuredly on PED’s” whilst Floyd isn’t. You’ve made the above claims, now justify it. Or will you duck it like the coward we all know you are? Wrong Dan. Canelo said he ate tainted meat in Mexico, which does have a known issue with clenbuterol use in its cattle industry. He also gave the names of several restaurants he ate at in Mexico, and was even photographed in public at a table at the Sonora Grill steakhouse. Is that 100% proof that his explanation was true? No, but it’s consistent with what he claimed and at least gives information to analyze and sort through and debate. Conor Benn on the other hand offered fvck all. And unlike Mexico with clenbuterol, UK farmers CANNOT use clomiphene to produce eggs on British soil. There are clear and very obvious differences between the two situations. Even a moron can see it. But asking you to have the intelligence of a moron has proven to be a lost cause.

:lol1: Get off my nuts, Dan. You still can’t acknowledge that Canelo’s explanation for his failed test, whether it was true or not, was believable. It’s such a simple thing to understand but you just can’t admit defeat. Which makes discussing anything else with your dumb ass a waste of time. If you refuse to see the obvious differences between Canelo and Conor Benn’s explanations then what good would it do to discuss the differences between Floyd and Ngannou? Except what you still can’t grasp is Canelo’s explanation is not believable what so ever because there is no evidence to back up anything he said in his explanation. You can insert ANY fighter that has failed a drug test and insert their excuse and deem it “believable”. Literally any of them outside of rare cases like Jarrel Miller where he’s been caught with things that has no chance of being detected by contamination. But without evidence then their explanation is not believable I.e Canelo, Conor Benn, Tyson Fury, Dillian Whyte, Lucas Browne, James Toney etc etc etc etc Hence why Conor Benn and Canelo’s situations are ni different than one another. Both claim contamination, both have ZERO evidence to support that claim. I legitimately can’t make this easier to understand. That said, the above is irrelevant. Justify your stance than Ngannou is “assuredly on PED’s” whilst Floyd isn’t. You’ve made the above claims, now justify it. Or will you duck it like the coward we all know you are?

Looking at you ducking being called out for your embarrassing double standard like the coward you are :lol1: You accuse all these guys of being on PEDs with no evidence, you lambast people who fail tests and label them cheats…….Except fighters you like you give them all a pass. What a sad embarrassment you are. ​ Justify your stance that Ngannou is “ assuredly on PEDs “ and Floyd isn’t. Justify your stance or just shut up with your fake crusade against PEDs altogether. :lol1: Get off my nuts, Dan. You still can’t acknowledge that Canelo’s explanation for his failed test, whether it was true or not, was believable. It’s such a simple thing to understand but you just can’t admit defeat. Which makes discussing anything else with your dumb ass a waste of time. If you refuse to see the obvious differences between Canelo and Conor Benn’s explanations then what good would it do to discuss the differences between Floyd and Ngannou?

Bivol. Which happened just last year. Looking at you ducking being called out for your embarrassing double standard like the coward you are :lol1: You accuse all these guys of being on PEDs with no evidence, you lambast people who fail tests and label them cheats…….Except fighters you like you give them all a pass. What a sad embarrassment you are. ​ Justify your stance that Ngannou is “ assuredly on PEDs “ and Floyd isn’t. Justify your stance or just shut up with your fake crusade against PEDs altogether.

Bivol. Which happened just last year. Yes, that one. He lost though.

A good one two, who? Bivol. Which happened just last year.

Kovalev for starters Are you kidding or you have been sarcastic? The same drunken past his prime kovalev. The Sergey that went 12 grueling rounds with yarde and 8 weeks later was fighting ginger with a rehydration clause. You call that a one two? And if I recall correctly seems to me he was pulling his punches too.

wtf kovalev could box, punch, was still prime and divisions higher. Not when Canelo fought him I actually though that he could get him out by the 6th but he was gun shy until he realized Kovi had nothing behind his punches Kovi was already washed by that time

Now this is fughin funny One two straight to Vodka wtf kovalev could box, punch, was still prime and divisions higher. who was floyd fighting the likes of victor ortiz a guy who couldn't keep his hands up