Jalolov under Anatoly Lomachenko.

yeah there aren't any american trainers that has stepped forward since Emmanuel Steward's passing. Eastern euros are better sticking with their coaches. Usyk, Bivol, etc are top of the game

When a flammable or combustible material, in combination with a sufficient quantity of an oxidizer such as oxygen gas or another oxygen-rich compound (though non-oxygen oxidizers exist), is exposed to a source of heat or ambient temperature above the flash point for the fuel/oxidizer mix, and is able to sustain a rate of rapid oxidation that produces a chain reaction, a "fire" is created. Keeping this information in mind, if we consider, hypothetically, an individual who deals in falsehoods - as in, they tell not what they believe to be true, but that which they know or otherwise believe to be untrue, for purposes which can include but are not necessarily limited to; deception, trickery, manipulation, or more simply pranking or "trolling", or quite possibly in fact for no practical purpose at all, but perhaps due simply to the nature of said individual - who's legwear happens to be ablaze through the chemical processes which I have previously outlined, I would like to specify that we could in fact make an analogy between the leg covering garment (pants, trousers, jeans, shorts, or whatever specific kind of bottom the deceptive individual happens to be wearing is irrelevant to this analogy, and making mention of such specifics would only serve to add unnecessary detail and detract from the brevity of this statement), and myself, in which we mean to explicitly imply that my current state of being is quite directly analogous to that of the legwear being worn by the aforementioned deceptive individual, or to put it another way, the same chain reaction which I have previously outlined to be, in this hypothetical, occurring with the deceptive individual's pants acting as the fuel for said chain reaction, is happening in reality with my physical body serving as said fuel instead. Now that I have outlined the validity of this analogy, specifically through shedding light on the ways in which I would in fact be able to be correctly considered as being analogous to the flaming legwear of the teller of falsehoods, I must confess that this idea is not a concept of a fictional nature, and one who would make this specific analogy would in fact be comparing not two hypotheticals, but instead would be comparing a hypothetical with that which very literally happens to be presently occurring in reality.​ What kind of nonsense is this? So you just cut and paste things now? This is the most superfluous load of bloviated claptrap I've read in awhile, possibly years. Unfortunately, it's not even relevant to the question. Furthermore, you could have summarized everything here and just said: "Liar, Liar, pants on fire." You could have just said that and not tortured the reader with this nonsense. But even if you had said that, it still would not have changed the fact that your response is completely irrelevant to the question being asked and tells me, as well as the rest of the forum members, that you don't even understand your own post. :lol1::lol1::lol1:

When a flammable or combustible material, in combination with a sufficient quantity of an oxidizer such as oxygen gas or another oxygen-rich compound (though non-oxygen oxidizers exist), is exposed to a source of heat or ambient temperature above the flash point for the fuel/oxidizer mix, and is able to sustain a rate of rapid oxidation that produces a chain reaction, a "fire" is created. Keeping this information in mind, if we consider, hypothetically, an individual who deals in falsehoods - as in, they tell not what they believe to be true, but that which they know or otherwise believe to be untrue, for purposes which can include but are not necessarily limited to; deception, trickery, manipulation, or more simply pranking or "trolling", or quite possibly in fact for no practical purpose at all, but perhaps due simply to the nature of said individual - who's legwear happens to be ablaze through the chemical processes which I have previously outlined, I would like to specify that we could in fact make an analogy between the leg covering garment (pants, trousers, jeans, shorts, or whatever specific kind of bottom the deceptive individual happens to be wearing is irrelevant to this analogy, and making mention of such specifics would only serve to add unnecessary detail and detract from the brevity of this statement), and myself, in which we mean to explicitly imply that my current state of being is quite directly analogous to that of the legwear being worn by the aforementioned deceptive individual, or to put it another way, the same chain reaction which I have previously outlined to be, in this hypothetical, occurring with the deceptive individual's pants acting as the fuel for said chain reaction, is happening in reality with my physical body serving as said fuel instead. Now that I have outlined the validity of this analogy, specifically through shedding light on the ways in which I would in fact be able to be correctly considered as being analogous to the flaming legwear of the teller of falsehoods, I must confess that this idea is not a concept of a fictional nature, and one who would make this specific analogy would in fact be comparing not two hypotheticals, but instead would be comparing a hypothetical with that which very literally happens to be presently occurring in reality.​