90%+ of the posters on here are complete idiots

Canelo did what GGG claimed he could do 1-COLLECTED ALL THE BELTS 2-ANYONE FROM 154-168 While GGG is fighting literal nobodies If you had like double digit IQ you'd understand why it's easier for Canelo to unify - he has the money to make fights happen, and if it goes 12 rounds, he knows he is winning. What a luxury to have that. The 2nd part, it's just low IQ dumbass stuff that fits you perfectly. GGG probably has the 2nd best stretch of fights over the last 5 6 7 fights, better than anyone not named Canelo. Again, you're just a complete dumbass Larry. Don't try to be a boxing analyst, or analyze anything really. You just aren't smart enough.

Mr Boxing-1023, aren't you part of the problem, sir? I have never seen anyone suck off ggg that hard. :stickp4: I have a lot of stuff to critique GGG on, just not the dumb ass stuff you idiots try to do it on. I call out dumb ass posts on here all the time, it just so happens that a ton of them are anti-GGG posts

dude...he literally officially lost...your opinion is the one that is meaningless.... So you agree that Canelo deserved a MD vs Floyd?

Canelo did what GGG claimed he could do 1-COLLECTED ALL THE BELTS 2-ANYONE FROM 154-168 While GGG is fighting literal nobodies

Mr Boxing-1023, aren't you part of the problem, sir? I have never seen anyone suck off ggg that hard. :stickp4:

I mean Weisfeld can be as corrupt as the next judge when it matters. They are all the same. But scoring fights is not that hard. It's really easy generally. If you follow the right criteria it is easy(like anything in life it takes practice, discipline,& watching the fight differently than normal (because normally ppl do none of those things properly when watching ppv at home with multiple distractions/not seeing the fight in real life/etc.) ,but you will misjudge the fight if you're just watching whos gloves touch the opponents face/body the most times even if they're missing horribly,not landing clean,no punch variety,arm punching jabs with tons of grazing gloves/glancing blows to the top of the head while their opponent lights him up at will straight to the vital points, whenever Canelo was done taking a breather on the ropes, where ggg didn't attack him; & when he does mostly everything gets dodged/parried/countered by Canelo just like body shots which was why in both fights g abandoned the body & Able was saying that he told ggg go to the body,but when you're taking punishment from Canelo fighters abandon gameplans & strategy because unlike the trainer,they have to endure the repercussions of those counters.

Larry you just don't really know much about boxing man. You obviously don't really know how to score fights. And you're a complete Mayweather fanboy. Your opinion on anything analysis wise is completely meaningless. Keep being a fan though, seems to make you happy. But yeah you are about as close to a boxing analyst as I am to fuc.king Megan Fox. dude...he literally officially lost...your opinion is the one that is meaningless....

That dumb fuks thinks Plant won last night....Even ADMITS he doesn't watch fights.he just reads compubox and looks at the punches thrown to see who won. I've never said that. I had a spotty stream and didn't really score it last night at all. Why do you always lie like that

You're oversimplifying (yes it all boils down to punches landed(Canelo was the one landing the most scoring(clean) punches both fights anyways) (but it matters tremendously how the punches are thrown,how cleanly they land,how effectively a fighter is controlling the fight,who looks to be doing more damage, Who is having their way by landing the kitchen sink/punch variety as opposed to just throwing arm punches & being afraid of counters to the body, etc.(Weisfeld had Canelo Winning btw which proves my point) I mean Weisfeld can be as corrupt as the next judge when it matters. They are all the same. But scoring fights is not that hard. It's really easy generally.

Lol. Steve Weisfeld in that article literally explains to you the relevance of the scoring criteria. Namely, that the only criteria judges are actively scoring is clean punches. Which, is common sense. Actively scoring anything else is dumb as fu.ck. Imagine watching a fight on the street. All you're scoring is who lands and what effectiveness it has. You aren't scoring anything else lol. You're oversimplifying (yes it all boils down to punches landed(Canelo was the one landing the most scoring(clean) punches both fights anyways) (but it matters tremendously how the punches are thrown,how cleanly they land,how effectively a fighter is controlling the fight,who looks to be doing more damage, Who is having their way by landing the kitchen sink/punch variety as opposed to just throwing arm punches & being afraid of counters to the body, etc.(Weisfeld had Canelo Winning btw which proves my point)

Actually I do know! His GOD ggg is the ONLY common denominator GGG just beat Canelo in both fights man. It is what it is. I give props where they are due. You fanboys are INCAPABLE of that

He has Lil g 109-0. Never lost a round. The DUMB fuk can't even pick a style of fighting he like?? To give ggg BOTH fights when they was 100% DIFFERENT told me all I needed to know about that Jack@ss. How the FUK u score both fights 100% the same 9-3 or 8-4??? If you prefer a certain style their is NO fkn way!!!! I had ggg 7-5 1st fight then 7-5 Canelo 2nd fight. But then again unlike that C@cksuker I keep it real when I score fights. Him he suks ggg DIC then says U WON no matter what! ? The fights weren't all that different lol. Canelo started well enough in each fight, with his handspeed and youth advantage able to somewhat neutralize GGG's workrate. Then as the fight goes on, GGG is outlanding Canelo by a decent margin in the middle to late rounds, and usually landing the best punches too. As the fight closes, Canelo gets a 2nd wind and the last couple rounds are competitive. Canelo has to pace himself because of stamina issues, and GGG's stamina has been 2nd to none. The dudes fought 2 fights, one year apart. How different could they really be? lolol

You have the audacity to say nobody should listen to me despite your literally just admitting you don't know how to score a pro fight.(you standard of scoring is how am fights are scored,which is why am boxing has always been considered robbery central) I don't need to read ppls opinions to know how to use set in stone scoring criteria that nsac judges are required to follow/the standard.(the criteria you continue admitting you disregard while being a huge outlier in claiming ggg not only won both,but by wide margins):lol1: Lol. Steve Weisfeld in that article literally explains to you the relevance of the scoring criteria. Namely, that the only criteria judges are actively scoring is clean punches. Which, is common sense. Actively scoring anything else is dumb as fu.ck. Imagine watching a fight on the street. All you're scoring is who lands and what effectiveness it has. You aren't scoring anything else lol.

I'm still trying to figure out how the Rtard had the EXACT score on two 100% different fights?? There are only so many scores in a 12 round fight. When 2 guys fight twice, odds are they fights will be similar. They may in fact actually end up with the same score. The more you know.

Let be honest for many of these guys the only thing they got going on is feeling they boxing expert Boxers are multimillionaires who could whoop their azz. and they think boxers really care about their opinions lol WTF? The average pro boxer makes 35,000 dollars a year. You're correct about the azz whooping though. :cool:

https://www.premierboxingchampions.com/news/veteran-boxing-judge-steve-weisfeld-offers-tips-how-score-fight Give that a read. Sounds like you differ from virtually every judge in the world, in how to score fights. If you don't know how to score fights, no one should listen to your opinions on what happened in a fight. You have the audacity to say nobody should listen to me despite your literally just admitting you don't know how to score a pro fight.(you standard of scoring is how am fights are scored,which is why am boxing has always been considered robbery central) I don't need to read ppls opinions to know how to use set in stone scoring criteria that nsac judges are required to follow/the standard.(the criteria you continue admitting you disregard while being a huge outlier in claiming ggg not only won both,but by wide margins):lol1:

Stop being a LIAR! Lie to yourself but NOT 2 me. I don't play that sht Next your going to say u ain't racist because u have 1 black friend.... LMFAO!!! You need help man

I don't argue with rtards Look in a fuc.king mirror

You bore me. I'm not even reading your sht any more TROLL! Go collect that $$$$ Kiss that Canelo poster before bed tonight honey. Or do you have some of his bout worn shorts instead? Probably never even washed em

Dude you just admitted you don't know how to score a fight(the way pro judges better than you had to spend thousands of hrs to master,based on 4 pro scoring criteria that has lil to do with"who landed the most punches outright") Thats why Teddy Atlas is fos too,he always thinks his scorecard knows more than everyone else & that even in razor close fights if you didn't score rds a draw like him & other close rds for his guy,then you should be screamed at in rage.:rolleyes: https://www.premierboxingchampions.com/news/veteran-boxing-judge-steve-weisfeld-offers-tips-how-score-fight Give that a read. Sounds like you differ from virtually every judge in the world, in how to score fights. If you don't know how to score fights, no one should listen to your opinions on what happened in a fight.