Who has the better wins? Dillian Whyte or Deontay Wilder?

Whyte's wins are clearly better that Wilder's.

Wilder's two wins over Ortiz are better than all of Whyte's wins. But apart from that? Whyte does have a deeper resume. So the best single wins goes to Wilder, but best overall resume goes to Whyte. People must also factor in that Wilder made 10 successful defenses of his WBC World Heavyweight title. Fighters raise their game when the fight for a Championship.

A serious question. Take away Deontay Wilder's paper title reign, and "10 defences against potatoes doe!" In actual fact, Dillian Whyte defended his "Interim" title against stiffer opposition than Wilder defended the full title. In my humble opinion, anyway. So how about it? How do people feel about this? Whyte's best wins versus Wilder's best? Alexander Povetkin Oscar Rivas Joseph Parker Dereck Chisora (x2) Robert Helenius or Luis Ortiz (x2) Dominic Breazeale Bermane Stiverne (x2) Artur Szpilka Gerald Washington ????? Feel free to change the names of Wilder's opponents if you think he beat anyone better than I listed. Whyte's list contains two former World champions and two former European champions, one Olympic champion and two Olympians in total. Wilder's list contains one former World champion, and nothing else of note, no Olympians either. Lmao Wilder’s record is fucking trash and if he gets smoked by Helenius he will be certified bum level and Fury’s record takes a massive hit.

I think it's a case of ranking whyte higher, ie better wins, but rating wilder higher ie wilder beats whyte Whyte did well to beat chisora and parker, but he don't inspire confidence with that chin

Whyte was sparked by Povetkin, he arguably lost the first fight with Chisora, and his fight with Parker is just...eugh. Got away with so much bullshit and the ref seemed in on it. Whyte just isn't it. I think the Wallin fight will prove that emphatically.

So now you're claiming that was a legit draw just to discredit Whyte? :lol1: Pretty much yeah! :lol1: Whyte's resume ain't that. Lost to Chisora, was comfortably losing the second until Eddie's ref unfairly got involved, was stumbling around the ring like a drunk against Parker, if the fight had gone on another minute he would've been stopped, was dropped and hurt by the useless midget Rivas, stank the place out against Wach, fought Browne who's a bum and didn't even do any training because he was depressed. Chinned by an ancient Povetkin, chinned by a rookie AJ.

As you are so eager to criticize Whyte's wins, it is only fair to do the same to Wilder's. Your opinion on Stiverne's shape in the second fight? Wilder struggling desperately in two fights versus Ortiz? The same Ortiz who has never acheived anything of note Pro or Am? Criticizing Whyte's wins solely makes you look like a biased cuck phaggot... maybe that's what you are, maybe it isn't. But that's what it looks like from your first post. I literally started with "as much as I shit on Wilders resume" and ended with giving Whyte the edge and saying neither are very impressive. Change your tampon and calm down.

Wilder's draw against Fury is better than anything on Whyte's resume. Whyte beating AJ in the amateurs is better than Deontay and Marsellus Wilder's resumes combined.

Wilder's draw against Fury is better than anything on Whyte's resume.

As much as I **** on Wilders resume, to be fair, Povetkin sparked Whyte the first time and looked like he'd been on the vodka all day in the rematch. Parker fight should have been a draw. First Chisora fight could have gone either way or been a draw. I suppose you'd still have to give him the edge on resume but neither of them are very impressive. As you are so eager to criticize Whyte's wins, it is only fair to do the same to Wilder's. Your opinion on Stiverne's shape in the second fight? Wilder struggling desperately in two fights versus Ortiz? The same Ortiz who has never acheived anything of note Pro or Am? Criticizing Whyte's wins solely makes you look like a biased cuck phaggot... maybe that's what you are, maybe it isn't. But that's what it looks like from your first post.

As much as I shit on Wilders resume, to be fair, Povetkin sparked Whyte the first time and looked like he'd been on the vodka all day in the rematch. Parker fight should have been a draw. First Chisora fight could have gone either way or been a draw. I suppose you'd still have to give him the edge on resume but neither of them are very impressive.

It's Whyte, obviously. But not forgetting that Wilder was defending titles, which puts it up a notch. But point taken. Wilder is less proven in the ring then Whyte.