Just making a thread to spread the word that the 3rd installment of Canelo v GGG is being negotiated for 168 lbs.
Let's hope it comes off. Let's discuss who wants to see it, why and who doesn't and why.
i do know the truth...youre false...youre lying...you either have me confused with someone else or youve made up the story based on assumption that since i bash golovkin i must hate all EE fighters....i havent and i dont..i openly admit to not being a fan of golovkin and bashing him...i do not do that to the others....100 percent incorrect
I know quite well who you are and I know you're a hater of more than just GGG so you can deny it (lies) & say whatever you want, I don't care anyways
That's the truth, but of course, we can only go back so far in posters history now so there's no way for me to prove it. But we both know the truth so I will leave it at that.
i do know the truth...youre false...youre lying...you either have me confused with someone else or youve made up the story based on assumption that since i bash golovkin i must hate all EE fighters....i havent and i dont..i openly admit to not being a fan of golovkin and bashing him...i do not do that to the others....100 percent incorrect
that is incorrect....and id love to see you prove it....
That's the truth, but of course, we can only go back so far in posters history now so there's no way for me to prove it. But we both know the truth so I will leave it at that.
GGG should have fought at 168 to test the waters already I made a thread about this, GGG should have fought his last fight at 168 so theres no its his first fight going up excuses.
He has a world title at 160 so naturally he would fight & defend there where Szeremeta was a mandatory.
It's not about color imo, a lot of Mexicans can't stand good looking guy kicking ass. One of the reasons Oscar was hated so much, I mean Chavez is loved and he's white af too.
They get mad that he makes their wife/gf cream their panties.
You have a point but I think that Oscar was more hated because he was Mexican-American and was proud of that.
not true....i dislike golovkin and thats it.......i have knocked others for certain things....but in general have a respect for them....i dislike golovkin...you dont see me bashing others UE fighters the way i do to him
You hate on Usyk and Loma every chance you get too. Pretty par for the course with you
derevy had ggg hurt in the 4th or 5th i think with a body shot. ref saved cripple g. aka lil g aka borat
The bolded just shows that you're a hater and arguably a racist. That said, please show us where GGG was hurt. I'll wait.
If you re-read:
“Rolls, Derevyanchenko, Szeremeta. And some think he went 2-1 there. And the two wins were vs unknowns.”
Go ahead and try to sell GGG’s title fight performance vs Derevyanchenko as a reason to be excited for a trilogy. Good luck. He looked like sh.t.
GGG landed more, hurt Derevyanchenko, didn't get hurt himself arguably and officially won the fight. That said, he also had the flu going into the fight. It's a well known thing.
- -U should seek help over that excessive blabbering. Or maybe rent a room with the Charlene sissas and Golovkin to slobber over.
Talk about slobbin, kid. Go eat dat french cawk boy
I'll watch, he was the only one that was competitive against Canelo and arguably won both fights. He might have one last hurray in him. Canelo has gotten bigger and better but GGG style is the one that challenges him the most
My fam dont use that excuse. They have their own criticisms of him. Mine is he picks and chooses who is the easiest or what division is the easiest. He SHOULD have had a trilogy vs G 2 years ago. He should have fought Mall charlo too. 168 is weak af, EVERYBODY knows that. If he fights at 175 and beats bivol and beter, he'll def go down as one of the best of this generation. I give kudos when its due. Not because fanboysim blinds me
- -U should seek help over that excessive blabbering. Or maybe rent a room with the Charlene sissas and Golovkin to slobber over.
Every ATG in history has more “who the fk is that guy” wins than good wins. Every ATG. So it’s pointless to mention that. 50+ pro fights, you’re likely going to have a ton of those. Fcking obviously dude.
Julio Cesar Chavez doesn’t have 115 fights vs 115 top 10 P4P fighters. Roberto Duran did not fight 119 champions. Alexis Arguello’s 77-8 record was not versus 85 top 10 ranked fighters of the respective weight classes he fought them in. So yeah. Canelo has a bunch of “who the fck is that guy”. More than he has good names. But so does, like, every single boxer in the last 100+ years.
Lomachenko, in my lifetime, and as long as i’ve watched boxing, is the only fighter who actually has more wins over notable opponents than he does over “who the fck is that” type of fighters. It’s that rare.
So mentioning that Canelo has a bunch of nobodies on his resume is a weak excuse to sh.t on it. JCC’s resume is like 90% tomato cans. You can’t fight 100 times vs just killers. Your great family of boxers using that as a reason sound like a pack of hypocrites if true.
Well said....
Sound either self-hating or white-hating. Only those Aztec looking Mexicans can be great. Some boxing fans only tend to root for who they look like most, physically. A very race-motivated sport. Canelo does not look like the typical Native-American looking Mexican. Looks Irish, Scottish, or something. Doesn’t even look like a “Spaniard” Mexican.
154:
Rhodes - #4
Trout - #3
Mayweather - #1
Lara - #2
160:
Cotto - Ring
GGG - #1
GGG II - #1
Jacobs - #2
168:
Smith - Ring
Saunders - #4
175:
Kovalev - #2
It doesn’t matter what country or race you are from, it is hard to hate a resume like that. I know Canelo got haters in Mexico but South and Central America got love for him. If Mexicans want to disown him, we will take him.
It's not about color imo, a lot of Mexicans can't stand good looking guy kicking ass. One of the reasons Oscar was hated so much, I mean Chavez is loved and he's white af too.
They get mad that he makes their wife/gf cream their panties.
Every ATG in history has more “who the fk is that guy” wins than good wins. Every ATG. So it’s pointless to mention that. 50+ pro fights, you’re likely going to have a ton of those. Fcking obviously dude.
Julio Cesar Chavez doesn’t have 115 fights vs 115 top 10 P4P fighters. Roberto Duran did not fight 119 champions. Alexis Arguello’s 77-8 record was not versus 85 top 10 ranked fighters of the respective weight classes he fought them in. So yeah. Canelo has a bunch of “who the fck is that guy”. More than he has good names. But so does, like, every single boxer in the last 100+ years.
Lomachenko, in my lifetime, and as long as i’ve watched boxing, is the only fighter who actually has more wins over notable opponents than he does over “who the fck is that” type of fighters. It’s that rare.
So mentioning that Canelo has a bunch of nobodies on his resume is a weak excuse to sh.t on it. JCC’s resume is like 90% tomato cans. You can’t fight 100 times vs just killers. Your great family of boxers using that as a reason sound like a pack of hypocrites if true.
My fam dont use that excuse. They have their own criticisms of him. Mine is he picks and chooses who is the easiest or what division is the easiest. He SHOULD have had a trilogy vs G 2 years ago. He should have fought Mall charlo too. 168 is weak af, EVERYBODY knows that. If he fights at 175 and beats bivol and beter, he'll def go down as one of the best of this generation. I give kudos when its due. Not because fanboysim blinds me
Has NOTHING to do with hating cause of how he looks. My uncle, Dad's brother, is Tony the Tiger Lopez, former ibf super featherweight champ. On my mom's side, her cousin is Loretto Garza, former wba super lightweight champ. They KNOW boxing and their criticism of Saul is justified more so than most. I grew up in the gym watching them both. As for those you listed, like i said, the kid has talent, but there are more "who the fcuk is that guy" on his record as well. Theres nothing wrong with criticising a fighter. But there is when it comes to NOT criticising because fanboysim blinds you.
Every ATG in history has more “who the fk is that guy” wins than good wins. Every ATG. So it’s pointless to mention that. 50+ pro fights, you’re likely going to have a ton of those. Fcking obviously dude.
Julio Cesar Chavez doesn’t have 115 fights vs 115 top 10 P4P fighters. Roberto Duran did not fight 119 champions. Alexis Arguello’s 77-8 record was not versus 85 top 10 ranked fighters of the respective weight classes he fought them in. So yeah. Canelo has a bunch of “who the fck is that guy”. More than he has good names. But so does, like, every single boxer in the last 100+ years.
Lomachenko, in my lifetime, and as long as i’ve watched boxing, is the only fighter who actually has more wins over notable opponents than he does over “who the fck is that” type of fighters. It’s that rare.
So mentioning that Canelo has a bunch of nobodies on his resume is a weak excuse to sh.t on it. JCC’s resume is like 90% tomato cans. You can’t fight 100 times vs just killers. Your great family of boxers using that as a reason sound like a pack of hypocrites if true.