Are youtube/celeb fights vs boxers good for boxing or bad?

I was thinking… If these popular youtubers are getting fans attention to boxing by participating in it and having real boxers in the undercard that would otherwise not get attention from viewers; how is that a bad thing? There are boxing shows that are actual circus acts, with no boxers of note in the undercard. From what i’ve seen so far from these exhibition events is that they place real fighters in the undercard. Casual fans and youtube viewers would otherwise not care for those fighters in the undercard. It’s very simple and plain to see. These exhibitions are drawing a lot of attention to boxing. Tyson vs Jones for example, sold 1.6 million buys. This fight was a circus act but had active boxers in the undercard, as well as Jake Paul vs Nate Robinson. That’s 1.6 million homes/bars with probably millions of viewers, realistically. Mayweather vs Logan also had real fighters, and it even had an upset in it. All i’m saying is you don’t have to like the reason why is getting more attention. I am suggesting fans to stop, and think about what this means: More attention=More money comes into boxing=We get better fights. If networks like the attention that boxing is attracting, they will make fights happen easier because they know the demand will be there. Is this an overnight thing? No, it’s something that can help boxing get increasingly more attention as these types of fights keep happening. It’s a no-brainer.