The talent is there. But who has he fought? His best win is a washed and damaged goods (via GGG) Kell Brook. He never stepped in the ring with the best at WW. Thurman? Nope. Porter? Nope. Spence? Nope. Pac? Nope. Ugas? Nope. D. Garcia? Nope.
Who has he fought? He's a top 10 P4P. But he's nowhere near top 5. Fools gold. Typical Top Rank Money Machine. Zero battles with a top 5 fighter in his own weight-class. That's pathetic and laughable.
FRAUD.
He’s a very good fighter but his resume is lacking real top fighters.
His best win is probably Postol. Josh Taylor beat him after about 12 fights.
Yes its a goddamned shame, that someone as Talented as Bud wasted his career already imo.(in that hes now past his prime) I oftentimes sound like a hater against Ggg/Crawford but I actually think highly of both their skills,I just don't think highly of them as a whole package which includes their diva attitude,risk averse career wasting, killing of big fights, loving to hunt & bumslay
.
I actually have been hoping all these yrs Bud will prove "haters" like me wrong
Can somebody tell this gimp Crawford has not been a career Welterweight. He is a 3 weight and undisputed world champion.
Brook isn't his best win and he has achieved way more than Errol Spence but where is the complaints about him from the TS? Where is the parity?
This is frivolously untrue. Crawfords careers almost over,hes going on 34 yrs old,hes middle aged,no longer in his prime,what does he have to show for hiz supposed atg talent(he fought guys at 140 whom were historically weak champions,in that they got kod in 1 rd by fighters whom Crawford didn't fight,Bud beat Indongo then bounced to feast off canned top rank venicin ever since.:friday:
Crawford capitalized off a manufactured top rank undisputed (Top Rank got weak fighters belts(because no other promoters at the time were willing to outbid bob to the sanctioning bodies to get their guys ranked #1 over much better fighters)
& fed them to Bud immediately who avoided the best for those weak champs that were temp paper champs(Indongo was kod in 2 by Prograis but of course..),he has done everything possible to kill big fights from happening because he is happy with false prophesies being his legacy as long as he gets to keep his 0 & get paid handsomely to fight the weakest no named or washed up opponents.
indongo was like a Yildirim,Smith(liam) or Feilding level underdog.
It would be ok for Crawford to have cleaned out a weak division & moved up,but he has since moving up only fought 1 champ whom was historically terrible.
Can somebody tell this gimp Crawford has not been a career Welterweight. He is a 3 weight and undisputed world champion.
Brook isn't his best win and he has achieved way more than Errol Spence but where is the complaints about him from the TS? Where is the parity?