Does Spence KO The shot Brook Crawford fought the same way?

Brook was in top condition for the Crawford fight. Maybe a slight step removed from his best. He just got caught and couldn’t recover. Spence fans are trying so hard to discredit this win. They better not be praising him if he squeaks past Danny, since Garcia has already lost to both Porter and Thurman. Difference between losing to Thurman and Porter tight than the Brook situation. He had not fought at 147 in over three years and fell apart from the first clean shot that he took. Crawford is the truth and the hate he gets at times is borderline hilarious, but bad analogy here. Being in great condition has nothing to do with punch resistance. Anyways, as for the question from the OP? Who knows if he could have done what Crawford did or one upped him by stopping Brook earlier. I suppose if he would have landed clean then you would have seen a similar situation.

Yes he does except he does not lose any rounds to Brook while Crawford lost two rounds to Brook. Spence would win every round from that washed up Brook and KO him in 4 rounds or less in my opinion.

Brook was in top condition for the Crawford fight. Maybe a slight step removed from his best. He just got caught and couldn’t recover. Spence fans are trying so hard to discredit this win. They better not be praising him if he squeaks past Danny, since Garcia has already lost to both Porter and Thurman.

Spence fought close range. Kell's weakness is mid-range. He would struggle against what Dwyer describes as a mod- range hooker.. i.e. Danny at Wembleh 2021.

It would be a first round KO. Yea. Crawford barely landed anything hard, and spence doesnt sit back as much as bud. He probably gets him out of there in 2.. kell looked done, his reactions to every punch didnt look good at all. Hopefully he hangs em up

Spence would jump on brook and stop him inside 2 rounds.

It would be a first round KO.

Spence not the best counter puncher so I doubt that.