Why I feel vindicated & have proven the"experts" p4p list are BS

I used to think of Bud as sweat pea 2.0 but that train has long left the station imo. I have for many yrs rated canelo p4p & considered it a joke that Loma/Bud were being called p4p #1 & ATG/goat etc,& I was among the only ppl on here whom adamantly said Teo would beat Loma & was rediculed for it,the same applies to when I say Spence will ko Crawford.(I specifically said it was because Buds defense is porous & that unlike Mikey he would get kod by not retreating) So the bottom line is everything I've been saying on here for yrs all has been demonstrated since then,Canelo has continued fighting champs,Loma was beaten handily,& Bud has looked far below Spences level & fought way worse comp. I have predicted for several yrs Crawford would be mid 30s before fighting anyone dangerous & hes proven me right. So in conclusion if all these things played out as they have it has shown that Bud was never p4p#1 or above Spence for that matter,& Canelo has been & still remains p4p#1. So just because a pbc fan or canelo fan says these things is irrelevant,what matters is that I have been saying what a joke these p4p lists are & have been proven correct despite the "experts" who make these lists & say I'm fos. Ffs they(TNRB) now have resorted to ranking Inoue as p4p#1 just because they finally had begrudgingly ranked Canelo #1 & hate him. Its an even bigger literal joke to now rate Inoe as p4p #1 because he beat an old ass journeyman who broke his face in the process. (A journeyman who was a huge underdog & a replacement opponent) just Canelos win over 200 lb Kovalev alone easily beats that win,& thats despite haters convincing themselves Kov didn't fight exactly how he did vs Ward,(better imo w Mcgirt,he was ahead on a card when kod),the fact they are now ranking Inoue p4p#1 shows how desperate & stupid these so called experts are & how they never learn after looking like complete clowns when their p4p like Loma lose to a non p4p like Teo. Crawford gets hated on because he is being treated as an ATG/Goat & p4p#1 while chasing the weakest not greatness,& the worst thing about him is he believes his own made up false hype. So hes content with getting paid great $ to fight what Arum himself calls stumble bums. Remember when Chocalatito was considered the goat by these fake experts? Or how many p4p#1 fighters were beaten by journeyman or very green young guns & those victors still don't get ranked high on p4p even though they proclaimed the man they beat goat like Loma(I have massive respect for loma btw)

Comments (2)

Canelo always has political advantages from hidden rehydration clauses, gloves, sanctioning bodies will always give him flexibility last mandatory June 18 2011 which was Ryan Rhodes domestic uk fighter, catchweights etc fighting Matthew Hatton for a vacant WBC 154 pound title at catchweight, networks, race and the fact he's mexican but he looks like a white man by the america media, also he was used as a opponent that could beat Floyd Mayweather when he was active like Pacquiao was. And I haven't even mention his failed drug test. Couldn't knocked out Mosley who at time haven't won a fight in 3 three years, couldn't knocked out who was supposed to have a weak chin who was dropped by featherfist Sergio Mora, couldn't knock out Chavez Jr and he supposed to be this elite knockout artist fans and media claim he is. But once again I'm NOT a fan of any fighter in boxing i'm a fan of boxing. P4P is subjective you can nitpick anyone resume in boxing. P4P is NOT a power ranking of the best fighters in boxing, it's originally for smaller fighters who were overlook by heavyweights about if their skillsets would translate if they were heavyweights. So you can't have Tyson Fury or Usyk on any P4P list.

5y ago

Inspired

Canelo fought amir khan, liam smith, cesar jr, rocky fielding. He lost to GGG in the first fight..and then failed a drug test. He did beat GGG in the second fight, but how can we forget that he was juiced and that was GGG was older anyway? I believe his fight vs kovalev was a fix, it's too obvious. So his only real wins are GGG and Danny Jacobs, in 3 yrs. meanwhile, Crawford's beat amir khan (better than canelo did), kell brook (better than ggg and spence did). Beat undefeated Kavaliauskas and jose benavidez. pound for pound, Crawford is better to watch, slicker and faster. Canelo being mexican meant he was a money man in boxing, so the broadcaster can pays the money for him which pays for his opponents too. that's the only difference.

5y ago