Weaker resume: Bud Crawford or Naoya Inoue?

You call it like you see it but you're obviously blind so what good is that? Like I said, if Canelo fought someone on the level of Kell Brook you would be the first one crying about it. Not defending it. He fought Rocky Fielding - can you find any comment of mine about that fight? All I said about it is it was an impressive performance from Canelo, though Fielding is not very good, and the weight clause Canelo put on him was sad too. Those are just the facts, man.

You sound like you're legit about to cry because someone thinks Canelo isn't number 1 pfp, or at least has competition there. I don't hate on Canelo. I just call it like I see it with him. He has benefitted from some good judging and also some good matchmaking. Those are the breaks when you are the A-side. To pretend he hasn't benefitted from those, and to ignore those things when analyzing him, makes you look foolish. Of course he is a really good fighter and has had been very successful. Loma and Crawford are in that same boat too. I would favor those 2 over Canelo due to them having no asterisks in their win sheet, and also neither one has really benefitted from super A side status as far as matchmaking goes. Loma definitely hasn't. You call it like you see it but you're obviously blind so what good is that? Like I said, if Canelo fought someone on the level of Kell Brook you would be the first one crying about it. Not defending it.

You're a hypocrite and a hater. So of course you would rank those guys above Canelo, trash his resume, then cry when people question the resume of Crawford & Lomachenko. You sound like you're legit about to cry because someone thinks Canelo isn't number 1 pfp, or at least has competition there. I don't hate on Canelo. I just call it like I see it with him. He has benefitted from some good judging and also some good matchmaking. Those are the breaks when you are the A-side. To pretend he hasn't benefitted from those, and to ignore those things when analyzing him, makes you look foolish. Of course he is a really good fighter and has had been very successful. Loma and Crawford are in that same boat too. I would favor those 2 over Canelo due to them having no asterisks in their win sheet, and also neither one has really benefitted from super A side status as far as matchmaking goes. Loma definitely hasn't.

And there you are getting ultra sensitive when someone mentions having Loma or Crawford ahead of Canelo on pfp. I definitely have them above him, not that it really matters. But a lot of people do. You're a hypocrite and a hater. So of course you would rank those guys above Canelo, trash his resume, then cry when people question the resume of Crawford & Lomachenko.

Canelo's resume destroys Crawford's and Lomachenko's. You don't have to acknowledge it if it hurts you...but it's the truth. If Canelo looked impressive against someone the quality of shot Kell Brook you would be the first one to criticize him. But this isn't about Canelo so take it to another thread. And there you are getting ultra sensitive when someone mentions having Loma or Crawford ahead of Canelo on pfp. I definitely have them above him, not that it really matters. But a lot of people do. Why so sensitive about it? Not at all. I give Canelo credit even if I don't fawn over everything he does. And yes, this thread is about Canelo. Be a man and admit that. I'd have more respect for you then

It has everything to do with it - you derive some sense of self-worth apparently from Canelo being considered number 1 pfp. His main competition for that spot have been Loma and Crawford. You and every other Canelo sycophant have propped up Canelo, despite his issues, while slighting Loma and Crawford, ignoring their great successes. Your coming out and making a thread, and other posts I've seen, after Crawford's win last night shows how pathetic you are, to be perfectly honest. Don't let me stop you though, I enjoy seeing it. Canelo's resume destroys Crawford's and Lomachenko's. You don't have to acknowledge it if it hurts you...but it's the truth. If Canelo looked impressive against someone the quality of shot Kell Brook you would be the first one to criticize him. But this isn't about Canelo so take it to another thread.

What does Canelo have to do with this? Is this how low Golovkin defenders like yourself have to stoop now, carrying on the feud in unrelated threads? It has everything to do with it - you derive some sense of self-worth apparently from Canelo being considered number 1 pfp. His main competition for that spot have been Loma and Crawford. You and every other Canelo sycophant have propped up Canelo, despite his issues, while slighting Loma and Crawford, ignoring their great successes. Your coming out and making a thread, and other posts I've seen, after Crawford's win last night shows how pathetic you are, to be perfectly honest. Don't let me stop you though, I enjoy seeing it.

Man Canelo fans wasting no time trying to slight Crawford to prop up Canelo by proxy lol. Love to see it. What does Canelo have to do with this? Is this how low Golovkin defenders like yourself have to stoop now, carrying on the feud in unrelated threads?

Man Canelo fans wasting no time trying to slight Crawford to prop up Canelo by proxy lol. Love to see it.

Amir when they fought was not as fast and his chin simply too dented. Not to mention that fight was at 147 and not 140 where Khan really excelled

You may be right. Or maybe Amir Khan. Amir when they fought was not as fast and his chin simply too dented.

Khan has accomplished more than Postol. True, but I believe Postol that Crawford fought was better than Khan version Crawford fought.

You may be right. Or maybe Amir Khan. No, I believe it is Postol. For 140 supremacy.

Khan has accomplished more than Postol. I'm actually a fan of Khan but he was pretty washed up by that stage. His best days were at 140 for me.

Viktor Postol Khan has accomplished more than Postol.

You may be right. Or maybe Amir Khan. Viktor Postol

Bud's best win is Horn. You may be right. Or maybe Amir Khan.

Bud's best win is Horn.

In a time where they email belts. That is nothing to flex about then tell all champs not to flex any of that **** , simple really :boxing:

In a time where they email belts. That is nothing to flex about What is this even supposed to mean? Wouldn't that be even more of a reason to flex beating a world champion and taking their belt as opposed to getting one in the mail by default? No ones giving out free belts to little guys barely anyone knows