Company Man ANDRE WARD Vouching for BROOK for TERRANCE CRAWORD! "HE's GOOD ENOUGH..."

"he's good enough", pretty much like the US Presidential race "settle for Biden", you know Brook sucks just like Biden, but hey it could be worse lol

He has a Job to do, he works for ESPN and they have a product to sell and want people to tune in so YES he justified Amir Khan, Mean Machine and now Kell Brook :dunno: I will tune in because I like Bud and I'm just a boxing fan overall so I really don't miss many boxing matches regardless but I fully expect Crawford to win probably in dominating fashion This is not the same Kell Brook from years ago regardless of how good he looks on the scale This is exactly how I feel about the situation. I just feel Ward is cheapening his value by becoming a salesman for ESPN/TopRank now.

He has a Job to do, he works for ESPN and they have a product to sell and want people to tune in so YES he justified Amir Khan, Mean Machine and now Kell Brook :dunno: I will tune in because I like Bud and I'm just a boxing fan overall so I really don't miss many boxing matches regardless but I fully expect Crawford to win probably in dominating fashion This is not the same Kell Brook from years ago regardless of how good he looks on the scale

LMAO 😂 they say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery 😝 not me though. i think you are just a coward 😐 Is that you Donald? Thinking the whole world revolves around you. Yet another Trump trait.

Ugas is a nobody and PBC. So I doubt it. Why are you saying this? Because Ugas said he wouldn’t mind fighting Crawford? Ugas is a decent fighter (overhyped right now, but decent, never been as good as Brook though), he’s a fighter first, he keeps his head down to the politics and just trains, and he’d fight anyone. Ugas is likely to continue being moved the Ortiz route, he’s a good competitor to use in-house, no point wasting him outside. And I’m not talking about Danny Garcia the fighter, I am talking about his matchups. Crawford vs Brook is better than Danny Garcia vs Granados or Redkach. Please read slower. This is the second time you have misinterpreted my words. And if you thought Garcia vs the likes of Redkach was better then yes, I agree, to each his own indeed. Maybe he never has been.. but he is now, brook isnt the same brook he was when he beat porter lmao why is that so hard to understand? Like I said this fight and your argument seem to hinge on brook just being a bigger name than ugas. Has nothing to do with proving anything, and anything short of a ko is just gonna make crawford look worse. Beating a inactive shop worn guy The ugas fight was rumored before this fight was signed.

Ugas was viable. Hes fresher, hes been fighting, he gave porter a hell of a fight. I'd take a guy with close losses like danny to top fighters then a guy who has been fighting a crippled benavidez, jr welterweights and a guy who's a shell of himself anyday. But I mean to each his own. This is obviously more about the name and draw then the talent level brook brings to the table nowadays. Ugas is a nobody and PBC. So I doubt it. Why are you saying this? Because Ugas said he wouldn’t mind fighting Crawford? Ugas is a decent fighter (overhyped right now, but decent, never been as good as Brook though), he’s a fighter first, he keeps his head down to the politics and just trains, and he’d fight anyone. Ugas is likely to continue being moved the Ortiz route, he’s a good competitor to use in-house, no point wasting him outside. And I’m not talking about Danny Garcia the fighter, I am talking about his matchups. Crawford vs Brook is better than Danny Garcia vs Granados or Redkach. Please read slower. This is the second time you have misinterpreted my words. And if you thought Garcia vs the likes of Redkach was better then yes, I agree, to each his own indeed.

And those 2 are the only noteworthy fights Danny has had at 147. Which he ofcourse lost, and albeit competitive, no he didn’t have an argument for winning either. That’s what “tf” I’m talking about. Stop talking about those PBC fighters, they aren’t viable. Haymon wont let one of them fight unless he has nothing to lose and everything to gain and Arum isn’t about to take the chance of PBC stealing his one belt and freezing him out from winning it again. That’s game over at that point. That risk would only be taken for a big fight/the belts. Only point of talking about the likes of Ugas is if Crawford goes to PBC. Which seems possible in the future. And a bad fight has nothing to do with pfp rankings. I’m talking pure entertainment. Fighting some old as fuk midget coming off a layoff, surgery is a bad fight. Ortiz vs that bum that took a fight is a bad fight. Hell, sht on them all you want, Crawford vs Horn, Kavaliauskas, Benavidez were not bad fights, only Khan who was well done and the fight was also the most boring, coincidentally. Crawford-Brook is a better fight than those. And it’s sure as sht a better fight than Danny Garcia Vs Ivan fuking Redkach. It’s weird as sht that early this year, people were cool with Crawford fighting Brook. Obviously we’d all want a better opponent, but nonetheless, “not bad”. Wondering why the opinion changed into this appalling fight. Anyway, just don’t watch. 2020 has been a ****ed enough year, save yourself from this travesty if you think it’s that bad. Ugas was viable. Hes fresher, hes been fighting, he gave porter a hell of a fight. I'd take a guy with close losses like danny to top fighters then a guy who has been fighting a crippled benavidez, jr welterweights and a guy who's a shell of himself anyday. But I mean to each his own. This is obviously more about the name and draw then the talent level brook brings to the table nowadays.

Haney isnt being called the best fighter on the planet tho..? Hes a young ass kid that was basically his first step into having a known name on his resume And tf are you talking about, danny has fought arguably 2 of the 5 best ww in the world, who has craw fought better than porter or thurman at ww? I would have been much more excited for an ugas fight. Kell has been a shell of himself since he got his his face cracked In two places And those 2 are the only noteworthy fights Danny has had at 147. Which he ofcourse lost, and albeit competitive, no he didn’t have an argument for winning either. That’s what “tf” I’m talking about. Stop talking about those PBC fighters, they aren’t viable. Haymon wont let one of them fight unless he has nothing to lose and everything to gain and Arum isn’t about to take the chance of PBC stealing his one belt and freezing him out from winning it again. That’s game over at that point. That risk would only be taken for a big fight/the belts. Only point of talking about the likes of Ugas is if Crawford goes to PBC. Which seems possible in the future. And a bad fight has nothing to do with pfp rankings. I’m talking pure entertainment. Fighting some old as fuk midget coming off a layoff, surgery is a bad fight. Ortiz vs that bum that took a fight is a bad fight. Hell, sht on them all you want, Crawford vs Horn, Kavaliauskas, Benavidez were not bad fights, only Khan who was well done and the fight was also the most boring, coincidentally. Crawford-Brook is a better fight than those. And it’s sure as sht a better fight than Danny Garcia Vs Ivan fuking Redkach. It’s weird as sht that early this year, people were cool with Crawford fighting Brook. Obviously we’d all want a better opponent, but nonetheless, “not bad”. Wondering why the opinion changed into this appalling fight. Anyway, just don’t watch. 2020 has been a ****ed enough year, save yourself from this travesty if you think it’s that bad.

Haney vs Gamboa is a bad fight. Over half of Danny Garcia’s fights at welterweight are bad fights. Spence vs Mikey Garcia was not even as good a fight as this one is. If you think it’s that bad don’t watch. I don’t watch fights that are as bad as people are making out this fight to be. It’s not the best vs the best, but it’s definitely a solid fight. Haney isnt being called the best fighter on the planet tho..? Hes a young ass kid that was basically his first step into having a known name on his resume And tf are you talking about, danny has fought arguably 2 of the 5 best ww in the world, who has craw fought better than porter or thurman at ww? I would have been much more excited for an ugas fight. Kell has been a shell of himself since he got his his face cracked In two places

if kell brook was good enough for ggg to break his face he's good enough for crawford to break his face, agree

Naw, 3G broke Brook's face, he's been done since that fight.

I watched a bit of their segment today and they are complete tools.. First of all brook was not good enough for golovkin. It was a bad fight, and this fight is also a bad fight. But they work for espn so... Haney vs Gamboa is a bad fight. Over half of Danny Garcia’s fights at welterweight are bad fights. Spence vs Mikey Garcia was not even as good a fight as this one is. If you think it’s that bad don’t watch. I don’t watch fights that are as bad as people are making out this fight to be. It’s not the best vs the best, but it’s definitely a solid fight.

"If Kovalev was good enough for Andre Ward to face, then he's good enough for Canelo to face" How good does that sound Dre?

The underlying problem is that unless it's for HUGE money (Mayweather/Pac, Wilder/Fury), Top Rank and PB C don't have a history of working together. Brook is about as good of a welterweight that Arum can get. PBC is likely to have the same problem finding quality lightweights for Tank to fight.

Well personally for me Brook wasn't "good enough" for Golovkin, I thought that was a stupid ass fight agree 100%

brooks is a gay coward and so is ward Is that you Donald? Making ignorant, ****phobic statements. Yet another Trump trait.

That fight would've made sense if Kell Brook actually worked for it and was deserving of it. In other words if he worked his way up after losing to Spence, which happened 4 damn years ago. Who has Kell Brook faced in these 4 years? 3 guys I've never heard of. How should I take Kell Brook seriously now against someone of the caliber of Terence Crawford, if he hasn't fought a noteworthy opponent in 4 years? how am I supposed to gage what he has left? what's with his eyes? Eye injuries are normally career enders so by the looks of it, Brook shouldn't be in there.

I watched a bit of their segment today and they are complete tools.. First of all brook was not good enough for golovkin. It was a bad fight, and this fight is also a bad fight. But they work for espn so...

Khan was good enough (to quit) for Bud... so why not Brook??

Well personally for me Brook wasn't "good enough" for Golovkin, I thought that was a stupid ass fight but mind you all Golovkin ever did was easy fights so it was typical. But since then Golovkin destroyed Brooks face and he's shot so it's not a great fight for Crawford either. I think Brook is just a waste of space now. Everyone thought that fight was a circus act and was against it. Ward is just creating a strawman argument and running with it, basically he just made up a narrative that didnt exist to argue his points. No one called for brook vs ggg and everyone was against it, now 4 years later and 2 broken eye-sockets later Brook surely isnt a name with clout still on it.