Who is the best, who beats who? Etc.
In my opinion the order #1 Fury (clearly), #2 AJ and #3 Wilder.
Having said that, I think Fury-AJ would be a lot more of a chess match, although I could see Fury catching up to him and getting the stoppage. At the same time, if AJ could hurt Tyson like Wilder did, I think AJ has the tools to finish the job. We saw Tyson can be caught in the first Wilder fight, but there's no telling if AJ could land like that... an intriguing match up but just feel that Fury all around is a better fighter.
AJ-Wilder, I feel that AJ does a couple of things marginally better than Fury; more power, better finisher. But he also doesn't have nowhere near the boxing skills of Fury, would not be able to get out of the way quite like Tyson can. I guess the question there would be if AJ can show his power early and have Wilder on the back foot from early, could see him unloading barrages and getting the stoppage. On the flipside if Wilder landed a hammer blow on AJ's chin, would he recover? Could he keep out of the way long enough to implement his own game plan. I feel this fight is close to a 50/50.
I believe the Fury-Wilder matter is settled honestly. Wilder will always have that tiny chance of catching Tyson and making it interesting, otherwise Tyson is in a whole different universe to Deontay when it comes to all around boxing ability. Tis embarrassing to watch honestly.
What is your opinion?
Furys the best. Wilder is the dark horse, the one who could change things with one big punch. Aj is just an anomaly waiting ie he has no experience with the current best.
True...
It’s possibly an isosceles triangle with Fury at the top far above the other two corners at the bottom.
- -That make U a box of rocks.
Thanks for the reminder!
I have zero doubt Wilder would blitz Whyte. If odds right I would even bet him to beat Khan Sr.
I agree, Wilder ices him unfortunately the bookies agree too, hence the short price.
I kind of see Wilder in a limbo state, but, yeah that's fair to say.
Until he proves something juxtaposed to Joshua I struggle to place him above Joshua given Josh has already come back from being destroyed.
Then again, that doesn't mean I favor Josh. Wilder's loss was to a higher caliber HW than Joshua's so I struggle to see Joshua as better or above Wilder. Wilder might have been destroyed but he did step up to the plate while Joshua got beat before he got there.
One could say they're equal, but really it's a question they both represent....anyone at 2 is both respectable and questionable.
Someone needs to prove something. I think Wilder beating Fury would move the question back to them and 1 and 2 rather than Joshua and Wilder at 2 and 3. Fury beating Wilder again just mean Fury is 1...which he already is so, not ****. Obviously Josh and Wilder can fight and answer it, or Joshua can fight Fury and just do better than Wilder ever had and answer it that way.
Until some such **** takes place I'm just going to question Wilder and Joshua.
Yeah I have Fury as the clear #1 and then Wilder and AJ as kind of 2A, 2B. I’d probably but Wilder as #2 purely cause I don’t rate Andy Ruiz but I wouldn’t argue too strongly either way as neither Wilder or AJ have done anything to notably separate themselves from one another.
I do! Because I would fukn make a SHT ton of money!!!!
I would drop at least $10k on Wilder and never look back but to collect my $$$$$
You probably wouldn’t from 10k tbh, Wilder will probably be a considerable odds on favourite.
He’s hypothetically listed at 1/3 on Skybet.
Of the three fury is the only convicted steroid abuser. So i'd like to see AJ v wilder, 2 clean fighters, box for the undisputed title. I dont really give a sh !!t about wilder/ gypsy roider 3.
Do you want to see Wilder-Whyte?
Just checking if you’re consistent...
There is no triangle until Wilder or Joshua picks up a win over one another or Fury.
There's just Tyson Fury now.
I don't see how you can have a triangle when one guy lost to the man and another guy lost to even lesser.
True...
It’s possibly an isosceles triangle with Fury at the top far above the other two corners at the bottom.
Of the three fury is the only convicted steroid abuser. So i'd like to see AJ v wilder, 2 clean fighters, box for the undisputed title. I dont really give a sh !!t about wilder/ gypsy roider 3.
No idea how anyone has Fury "clearly number one".
AJ has the best resume and the most belts. Fury is probably the most skilled but he has yet to prove that against AJ. I would have said the London man was the best but after the mauling of Wilder, I think number 1 and 2 can only be decided by a fight .... just what the Fury humping BT sports even admitted.
Wilder is a non entity. I am more curious about seeing Whyte come into the fold than that buffoon.
Ortiz is underrated by those who think he's trash but he's done absolutely nothing to put him above White and Parker.
He's never beaten anyone on the level of Ruiz, Parker, Rivas or even Chisora. Get a grip.
Ortiz because he has mad skills even for an old man. Don’t tell me you have fat Whyte who barely beat a guy ranked 53 better???
Why not? What has Ortiz done to be seen as any better than Whyte? What is Ortiz best win again?
The thing is in top level sport it's hard for fans not to see you as only as good as your last fight.
AJ was circumspect after to getting wiped out by Ruiz.
Wilder had an awful night against Fury.
Fury looked like a beast.
But I do agree with the sentiment that AJ not so much that he has a bad chin. Its decent hes not been cleaned out by 1 shot.
But he stays hit. For ages.
We have known that since Dillian Whyte got him in their fight. He was not in a good way for a few rounds after that. Wlad and Ruiz have also done it to him.
So I think Wilder would get him out.
He could box well enough with Fury. I think it would be close-ish
- -U drinkin' ain't thinkin'.
U drunkish?
I don't think it's much of a triangle right now. One guy beat another twice.
Third fighter is 1-1 against a relative unknown in his past 2 fights.
Just a conventional 1 through 3 ranking.