PAC whoops Swift and Spence this year

That's true... Terence wont have a chance a decade back. Manny will have a chance but i dont know about the 50/50... Its a young more talented JMM vs a 41y/o. Yeah but we also haven’t seen Crawford against a top ranked contender like say a Spence, Thurman or Porter. Hell even a Danny Swift. Until we see Crawford take one of those guys on, then we’ll see where he stands. Like Kellerman says, the eye test Chico, it never lies.

PAC even at age 41 has a 50/50 chance against Crawford. In his prime tho? He molly whips Crawford in 6-7 rounds. That's true... Terence wont have a chance a decade back. Manny will have a chance but i dont know about the 50/50... Its a young more talented JMM vs a 41y/o.

50,000 posts I bet half are his Manny hate posts Pathetic life he has. His highlight of the day is to enter new manny threads to hate lmfao what a loser.

Lmfao this guy is in every Manny thread there is. He wakes up looking for new Manny threads to enter. 50,000 posts I bet half are his Manny hate posts

This is BoomBapTraps alt. Again, a razor thin split decision that PAC was outlanded in both power punches and total punches = outclassed? THURMAN WAS OUTCLASSED BY MANNY. It’s “just the facts” hombre. Get over it. And go get those f@gz you always looking for.

I bet there isn't a Manny thread that you haven't posted in Lmfao this guy is in every Manny thread there is. He wakes up looking for new Manny threads to enter.

PAC outclassed Thurman, indeed. He would give Spence the work too. GrandPac still ****ting on these young bulls. This is BoomBapTraps alt. Again, a razor thin split decision that PAC was outlanded in both power punches and total punches = outclassed?

Why would he go higher? Do you think he is a better fighter now than he was 15 years ago? If he isn't better now then why would he go higher on some all time great list that you don't have? Do you think Pacqiao is a better fighter now than he was when he KOed Hatton, Oscar and Cotto. I don't think he is. If he is not better now than he was back then why would he go higher on some all time great list? How likely is it that he is better now than he was back then? Think about it? He probably would beat Garcia but a much younger Pacquiao would beat Garcia much easier. He can't beat Spence and will be a b ig underdog if they fight. Even if he did beat Spence the KO loss to Marquez, the loss to Mayweather and the robbery losses to Bradley and Horn would not go away. I know it is amazing Pacquiao is fighting so well at his age but he is still not as good as he was in his prime so to me he goes no higher no matter what he does now. This all time great stuff is just opinion and not provable fact so put him where ever you want on your all time great list but you are giving him credit in advance for fights he has not won yet. Beating Thurman is not the equal of beating Spence who is a much better fighter than Thurman. I think it's important to specify whether we are talking about going up as far as having a higher peak or going up in terms of career accomplishments. If we are talking about how good Pacquiao is then no, I don't expect him or any other fighter to be better at 41 than they are at 21 or 31. If we are talking about career accomplishments then yes, beating top welterweights in Danny Garcia and Errol Spence Jr. at this point in his career would move him up the ATG list. It's like Lebron James moving up the ATG list in basketball by scoring more points. Is he better than he was at his absolute peak? No, but will he move up the scoring list? Of course, because he is scoring more points just like Pacquiao would be adding to his list of accomplishments.

Your stalking has really gotten out of hand. There has to be other posters on this forum you can engage in debate with such that you don't need to stalk me and the other Floyd fans you mention in this post. I bet there isn't a Manny thread that you haven't posted in

Immediately following is that hotly anticipated, Floyd vs. (Insert hyped up Japanese kickboxer here) superfight. I heard Floyd has a height, weight, and reach advantage, plus it's in the contract that the kickboxer can only throw three punches a round. Plus you, Larry, and Iron Dan are the Judges, with Travesty as the ref. Should be a barnburner Your stalking has really gotten out of hand. There has to be other posters on this forum you can engage in debate with such that you don't need to stalk me and the other Floyd fans you mention in this post.

PAC outclassed Thurman, indeed. He would give Spence the work too. GrandPac still ****ting on these young bulls.

I am looking forward to a Spence v pac fight. Immediately following is that hotly anticipated, Floyd vs. (Insert hyped up Japanese kickboxer here) superfight. I heard Floyd has a height, weight, and reach advantage, plus it's in the contract that the kickboxer can only throw three punches a round. Plus you, Larry, and Iron Dan are the Judges, with Travesty as the ref. Should be a barnburner

Nobody said he us not the same. People are saying he might not be... We don't know, he just survived a car accident. You such a fanboy you ignoring that... And getting defensive. If Spence is ruined no one will get full credit for beating him... Not Manny, not Crawford, not Thurman. so you're making excuses that spence might not be the same fighter?? but this is what you also said regarding pac -- Problem is Manny is 41 now, not the same fighter. so manny being 41 and not the same fighter, but you dont care about this though right???? but with spence 'bu bu but he just got out of a car crash".. lmao!!!!!!!!!

In boxing when i guy says that, then sits ringside, then get called out to the ring after.... What does that look like? Did Cotto get credit for beating Martinez... Yes or No? The only reason this fight is being considered is cuz of the accident. Perfect matchmaking.... Same as Thurman coming off a 2 year layoff and almost knocked tf out. Perfect matchmaking again. Although i personally give Manny credit for the win. It was a good win in my book. Im not a hater, but im not a fanboy either. Which one are you friend? blah blah blah.... show me where pac says he wants spence for his next fight and you win! go!!!

he said he's interested in fighting the winner of that fight... he never mention that he wants the winner for his next fight! this is you reaching. yall thought pac wasnt gonna fight spence ever so yall can keep running around with "pac is ducking spence"... but now that there is talks of this fight happening, yall making excuses... what difference does it makes, if pac fought spence before or now? like you mention pac is 41!!!! so what advantage does pac have over spence now? lmao!!!! shooked azz mofos!!!! In boxing when i guy says that, then sits ringside, then get called out to the ring after.... What does that look like? Did Cotto get credit for beating Martinez... Yes or No? The only reason this fight is being considered is cuz of the accident. Perfect matchmaking.... Same as Thurman coming off a 2 year layoff and almost knocked tf out. Perfect matchmaking again. Although i personally give Manny credit for the win. It was a good win in my book. Im not a hater, but im not a fanboy either. Which one are you friend?

Nobody said he us not the same. People are saying he might not be... We don't know, he just survived a car accident. You such a fanboy you ignoring that... And getting defensive. If Spence is ruined no one will get full credit for beating him... Not Manny, not Crawford, not Thurman. so you're making excuses that spence might not be the same fighter?? but this is what you also said regarding pac -- Problem is Manny is 41 now, not the same fighter. so manny being 41 and not the same fighter, but you dont care about this though right???? but with spence 'bu bu but he just got out of a car crash".. lmao!!!!!!!!!

When’s he gonna get started? Again, a razor thin split decision in which PAC was outlanded in both power punches and total punches = outclassed? Spit the dicke out....,. Lmfao...... Why so he get spit, lather, and put it back in!

Nobody said he us not the same. People are saying he might not be... We don't know, he just survived a car accident. You such a fanboy you ignoring that... And getting defensive. If Spence is ruined no one will get full credit for beating him... Not Manny, not Crawford, not Thurman. well, he's out drinking, going clubbing, this is what he was doing before the crash!!! lmao!!!! so im sure he's fine. and like you mention a few post back, pac is 41!!! so why are yall making excuses for spence? lmao!!!!!! shouldnt it be the pac fans making excuses?? lmao!!!!

He said the winner of Garcia/Spence..... If Garcia won fight would have been made. Spence won and called him out to the ring. Manny didnt want no parts of Spence then chose Thurman. The weakest link with a belt. How am i making anything up? And whats my agenda? Not riding his nuts? Then yeah. U a Pac fanboy.... Always have been. If anybody did exactly what he did you wouldn't be saying that he said he's interested in fighting the winner of that fight... he never mention that he wants the winner for his next fight! this is you reaching. yall thought pac wasnt gonna fight spence ever so yall can keep running around with "pac is ducking spence"... but now that there is talks of this fight happening, yall making excuses... what difference does it makes, if pac fought spence before or now? like you mention pac is 41!!!! so what advantage does pac have over spence now? lmao!!!! shooked azz mofos!!!!

Undefeated prime top 3 thirty year old Thurman was weakest link ? Lol ok. And Pac outclassed him at age 40 with a million wars on his body. Don’t forget Crawford been wanting Thurman. When’s he gonna get started? Again, a razor thin split decision in which PAC was outlanded in both power punches and total punches = outclassed? Spit the dicke out....,.