Gervonta ....Allegedly Struck Woman In Face

more than the physical harm, it's the public humiliation suffered by that woman that is more painful.

hood rats tend to get out of pocket, n deserve to be grabbed n snatched up at times but you should never hit them, especially as a pro boxer. nobody really gives a damn either way its just another situation to exploit and cry about. Show indifference. Replace them, never chase them. You are actually showing her that you need her and can't do better if you act out emotionally and physically as Tank did. He's a young man still, he can learn.

You list allegations and then say "THIS is the guy you all have so much faith in?" That implies guilt and you're judging him on allegations. "innocent until prove guilty" doe. Only if you have the right skin colour for Big Dunn. You're clearly a hypocrite racist. It's as clear as Davis assaulting that woman. LMFAO! dude its posts like this why you are seen as one of the worst posters on this site. Posting he is facing a lawsuit in no way implies guilt. You can't be that dumb and desperate. everything else I posted has been proven, unless you think his multiple stints in rehab and his admission of a drug and alcohol addiction is fake. I am judging anyone that would take his word given his history. So what? You can keep trying with the racist thing but it just makes you look worse. You're really mad that I will not convict Tank like you and so many others. I get you hate America and have a huge inferiority complex when it comes to American men but you're really over the top with this. No matter what accusations you hurl at me Tank is innocent until proven guilty. I guess the constant making fun of AJ, Fury you and all the other weak, insecure, British men on this site has pushed you over the edge. Drink some Earl Grey and get over it. Do with Tank what you did with Whyte-wait and see what happens.

You're judging him on allegations. Innocent until proven guilty doe. You're the racist POS that many have called you out as being. That's clear now. Now you are backtracking like the dirty little f@gg0t we all know you are. The post clearly states he is facing a lawsuit, which is a fact. In no way does it say he is guilty of that like you claimed. Now that I destroyed that BS, you come at me about judging him. I'm judging posters that accept his word given everything we know about him that I posted. all have been verified. You can't refute the standard of innocent until proven guilty. You tried and failed so now you try and turn this in to racism thing by regurgitating claims about me from other posters that couldn't refute something I posted. You've been so thoroughly emasculated that you can only resort to "throwing everything on the wall and seeing what sticks". LMFAO! you are only coming off as weaker and more insecure because you had to deviate from the actual discussion.

Here's Big Dunn exposing himself as the hypocrite he is. DLH is the wrong skin colour to be "innocent until proven guilty" it seems. WTF? Geez you are just desperate and making yourself look like a complete *******. He is currently facing a lawsuit, not a criminal case. Where in this post did I say he was guilty of what the woman accused him of? edit: I see you made the same post in the other thread. Where did I post he was guilty of anything? The post clearly states "He is currently facing a lawsuit for fisting a woman that wouldn’t agree to put kitchen utensils in his anus". Since you know I'm right about Tank being innocent until proven guilty you couldn't "win" the debate in the other thread. So now you come in here and falsely state that I made a claim of ODH's guilt, which anyone can see I didn't, so you can turn it into a racism argument which you think will allow you to "win". You weak f@gg0t. You truly are a stupid piece of shii If you think the argument you are making here works or if you think you are going to scare me away from my contention that Tank is innocent until proven guilty. Embarrassing, but typical for an insecure British f@gg0t such as yourself. Try a little harder next time. Now run away like British men always do you cowardly cuck.

Backed myself into a corner? denying how the statement works? Why do you insist on playing dumb? WTF? How is using the basic tenet of American justice backing myself into a corner? You know exactly what innocent until proven guilty means when discussing a criminal matter, which this is, but instead you are playing a childish semantics game to try and make a point. You look ridiculous doing so. The cops were found not guilty in a court of law at trial, by a jury. OJ as well was found not guilty, at trial, by a jury. Tank has not had a finding in his matter in a court of law. He hasn't even been into court yet. For you to compare Tank's matter at this stage, arrest, to the outcome of the Rodney King cops trial or the OJ trial shows a lack of intelligence on your part that borders on just plain ******ation. At this point Tank is innocent until proven guilty. So are the cops who beat Rodney King. In the court of public opinion, Tank is guilty. All goal posts set by you.

You backed yourself into a corner and can’t get out no matter how hard you try, no matter how long your statements get. You yourself said it’s innocent until proven guilty. Now when they are not proven guilty, you try a washing machine spin. It’s right here in the wording, innocent until proven guilty. Since they have not been proven guilty they are innocent. You can’t just use statements that you think help your cause and then deny how the statement works when it doesn’t fit your agenda. You: it’s innocent until proven guilty Reality: cops in Rodney King found not guilty so they are innocent You: No, not like that! The court of public opinion doesn’t matter. Or else OJ would have served time for killing his wife. The court of public opinion also says Tank is guilty. So which way do you want it? Backed myself into a corner? denying how the statement works? Why do you insist on playing dumb? WTF? How is using the basic tenet of American justice backing myself into a corner? You know exactly what innocent until proven guilty means when discussing a criminal matter, which this is, but instead you are playing a childish semantics game to try and make a point. You look ridiculous doing so. The cops were found not guilty in a court of law at trial, by a jury. OJ as well was found not guilty, at trial, by a jury. Tank has not had a finding in his matter in a court of law. He hasn't even been into court yet. For you to compare Tank's matter at this stage, arrest, to the outcome of the Rodney King cops trial or the OJ trial shows a lack of intelligence on your part that borders on just plain ******ation. At this point Tank is innocent until proven guilty.

You are trying to gerrymander a basic legal right to win an argument on an online forum. That should be beneath you. But since you insist on digging in for reasons I can’t fathom I will respond. Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law is the standard we have for anyone arrested. I didn’t specifically add “ in a court of law” because that is implied. You know this but semantics was the only way you could “win” so you seem to Be intentionally forgetting that. The cops went to trial. They were found not guilty. Not guilty is a finding that doesn’t equate to innocence in the court of public opinion but does equate to innocence in a legal sense. So you are asking me about the Rodney king cops from a public opinion perspective- they are not seen as innocent by the public. From a legal perspective they are because they were not proven guilty. As I responded to another poster tank very easily might get off because Al will use his money. Now please don’t play dumb again or try to use semantics to win. It was bad enough that idiot daggum brought up the columbine shooters that weren’t arrested. Tank is innocent until proven guilty. We all know he is. If you and others don’t wish to extend that to him, ok. I will. You backed yourself into a corner and can’t get out no matter how hard you try, no matter how long your statements get. You yourself said it’s innocent until proven guilty. Now when they are not proven guilty, you try a washing machine spin. It’s right here in the wording, innocent until proven guilty. Since they have not been proven guilty they are innocent. You can’t just use statements that you think help your cause and then deny how the statement works when it doesn’t fit your agenda. You: it’s innocent until proven guilty Reality: cops in Rodney King found not guilty so they are innocent You: No, not like that! The court of public opinion doesn’t matter. Or else OJ would have served time for killing his wife. The court of public opinion also says Tank is guilty. So which way do you want it?

I told you guys this was gonna happen. Dude is gonna piss his life away like Bonehead did.

They were not proven guilty. Innocent until proven guilty. Why is this so hard for you? You are trying to gerrymander a basic legal right to win an argument on an online forum. That should be beneath you. But since you insist on digging in for reasons I can’t fathom I will respond. Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law is the standard we have for anyone arrested. I didn’t specifically add “ in a court of law” because that is implied. You know this but semantics was the only way you could “win” so you seem to Be intentionally forgetting that. The cops went to trial. They were found not guilty. Not guilty is a finding that doesn’t equate to innocence in the court of public opinion but does equate to innocence in a legal sense. So you are asking me about the Rodney king cops from a public opinion perspective- they are not seen as innocent by the public. From a legal perspective they are because they were not proven guilty. As I responded to another poster tank very easily might get off because Al will use his money. Now please don’t play dumb again or try to use semantics to win. It was bad enough that idiot daggum brought up the columbine shooters that weren’t arrested. Tank is innocent until proven guilty. We all know he is. If you and others don’t wish to extend that to him, ok. I will.

I think it only fair the forum treat Gervonta like it did Kovalev. When Kovalev got accused many forum members withheld judgement. Now with Gervonta it looks like the posters that posted before me have already convicted him.Come on now guys, all of you claim to not be racists in any way. OK, prove it by extending to Tank the same benefit of the doubt you extended Kovalev. Once Tank is proven guilty then that is the time to criticize and go in on him. You’re right. You should reach out to the Davis defence team. Maybe they can mount to “what about kovalev doe” defence in court.

I think it only fair the forum treat Gervonta like it did Kovalev. When Kovalev got accused many forum members withheld judgement. Now with Gervonta it looks like the posters that posted before me have already convicted him.Come on now guys, all of you claim to not be racists in any way. OK, prove it by extending to Tank the same benefit of the doubt you extended Kovalev. Once Tank is proven guilty then that is the time to criticize and go in on him. in russia it's normal to beat the living ffff out of a female. they all do it, routinely.

If any of this is true (and we haven't seen any police footage of the actual hit yet btw) it's quite alarming that he had the wherewithal to literally drag her off to a private room to "discipline" her. It would be nasty as heck but more understandable if he'd just slapped the **** out of her in a moment of rage, instead of planning it. Now having said all that, i'm a big believer in process and the dude deserves his trail before we start branding him as wife/baby momma beater. I don't need a jury to tell me what I saw in the footage, but it's one thing to grab somebody by the collar (it's brutish and moronic) but it's another to inflict actual pain on a woman by slapping her or punching her or whatever. I'm not sure what happens to a man in his life to make him even consider laying hands on a woman outside of real self defense, but they don't belong in a civilized society. That goes for the alleged Kov charges, Bruno, Lampley, Mayweather etc and any other nasty ****er.

I don't think there was a video but I do recall she had a broken nose and a concussion. Innocent until proven guilty is a stupid argument? Maybe America isn't the place for you. Try some other country.video evidenfe tells All. Ask Ray Rice. End of story.

I think it only fair the forum treat Gervonta like it did Kovalev. When Kovalev got accused many forum members withheld judgement. Now with Gervonta it looks like the posters that posted before me have already convicted him.Come on now guys, all of you claim to not be racists in any way. OK, prove it by extending to Tank the same benefit of the doubt you extended Kovalev. Once Tank is proven guilty then that is the time to criticize and go in on him. OK then Davis is a jackass. I've said that about Kovalev several years ago and that was before he got caught up in the latest abuse incidents. This isn't the first time Davis has had assult charges laid against him. When you act like a criminal you get treated like one.

What a fool. At least Kovalev made sure there were no cameras around.

Smh. Saying a man shouldn't put his hands on a woman unless in self defense is beta? I bet your mother's proud. And I love your exaggeration. Pointing out something wrong means I'm "crying over it." Well, okay. Since we shouldn't care about things concerning people we don't know, I guess you don't care about Travyon Martin (who's 25th birthday would've been today), Philando Castile, Michael Brown, or Eric Garner. All black men who got murdered by cops, and never got justice. But you don't know them, so I guess you don't care and their lives mean nothing. man, that was a mean transition..lol you went from one extreme to another..

Innocent until proven guilty is not the same as saying not guilty equals innocence. This is just shameful that you would even make this argument. They were not proven guilty. Innocent until proven guilty. Why is this so hard for you?

Considering they were never found guilty, they are indeed innocent based on what you said, “Innocent until proven guilty”. Not guilty equals innocent. Innocent until proven guilty is not the same as saying not guilty equals innocence. This is just shameful that you would even make this argument.

yes you are an extreme beta now, crying over a chick you dont even know, a chick who will still be with him for years to come..I could careless and wondering why you care at all...this is the type of situation where you try to be captain save a thot and he and her end up jumping your beta ass thats the type of ppv i would pay for. forget santa cruz