Wilder's ducking is making him look like a hard bargainer

Lets be fair, its 50-50. If you don't want to see it, maybe try a different sport? Yeah, its fairly obvious to say Joshua lost and that its fact. Doesn't take intelligence to understand that! Id love to see the fight sir

I think Josh is the one wilder fears most. Josh beat wlad, the man who downed him in sparring. Wilder believes in triangle theories

its aj fans that start these stupid threads daily trying to force these stupid narratives; so I respond the way I see fit, its a fact that aj got his azz whooped, and its a fact they are the #1 fan base starting these stupid threads and posting like wild maniacs all day, what did I say wrong? Lets be fair, its 50-50. If you don't want to see it, maybe try a different sport? Yeah, its fairly obvious to say Joshua lost and that its fact. Doesn't take intelligence to understand that!

Its very hypocritical of you to talk about people being bias towards AJ or Hearn, right before you go off on an anti-Joshua rant about his last two fights. You only responded to the thread because you feel compelled to, as a Wilder fan. What do you get out of replying? Probably the same as the guy starting the thread. its aj fans that start these stupid threads daily trying to force these stupid narratives; so I respond the way I see fit, its a fact that aj got his azz whooped, and its a fact they are the #1 fan base starting these stupid threads and posting like wild maniacs all day, what did I say wrong?

Directly quoting someone's Twitter feed and the truth are NOT the same thing. Nobody said they were. The troll I was responding to had claimed that Espinoza had stopped replying when Hearn asked him to post the contract he sent (to fool fans who didn't realize Espinoza wasn't the one who sent the contract). Directly quoting Espinoza's twitter feed shows that troll was lying about Espinoza not responding. By doing so, you are saying that everything that everything posted on Twitter is categorically true. Nobody said that. Next time you should read what you're replying to.

You're lying. Espinoza stated the contract said Sky got UK rights. Hearn said he was lying, so Espinoza posted a scan of the portion of the contract pertaining to UK rights to prove he was telling the truth and that Hearn was the liar. Hearn then did was he always does and tried to get cute with his phrasing to try to fool UK fanboys. So Hearn said: "Show the contract you sent" Hearn did this for two reasons. #1 - He knew the contract he was sent came from Wilder, not Espinoza, so Espinoza couldn't possibly show the contract he sent, since he's not the one who sent it. #2 - He knew it would be considered incredibly unprofessional by everybody in the industry to post a full contract, so there was no way Espinoza could fulfill Hearn's request without doing incredible damage to himself professionally. UK fanboys fell for Hearn's trick, just like they always do. You're lying. Espinoza continued to reply. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100125303345737728 Never said I sent it. Wilder sent it and you confirmed receipt. "Hearn told ESPN that he had indeed received the offer by email from Wilder's personal account..." https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100126798531256320 Three detailed pages, not one paragraph. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100128918009507840 Mischaracterize much? Never said "we" sent a contract. I said a contract was sent. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100140638388056066 Again, never said "I" sent a contract. And I'm not going to expose private business arrangements in a Twitter discussion. Considering your attempt to deny AJ's 6-fight Showtime deal after just 3 fights, it's not surprising that you wouldn't remember this one either. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100143910163238912 So what do you call the 3-page document you received? An agreement? Deal proposal? Term sheet? It had all the relevant terms necessary to establish an agreement. Remember you thought that the AJ multi-fight deal wasn't a contract either, and you were wrong about that too. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100145189828603904 Didn't release anything that wasn't already public, other than you failed attempt to ignore the agreement you already entered into. You didn't answer the question. A 3-page contract was sent. You said it wasn't. So what do you call the 3-page document that you received? https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100146972428767232 I know what was sent, as do you, since we both received copies. You don't dispute that you received a 3-page document containing the deal terms. For the THIRD time, I'm asking you what you call that 3-page document you received, since you're claiming it's not a contract. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100149791701590021 LOL...the lies continue. You're quite creative. You don't dispute that you received a 3-page document with deal terms, but you don't consider it a contract...just like you didn't consider the AJ multi-fight deal a contract until you got legal advice telling you otherwise. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100153602381893634 No issue with AJ. Just reminding you of your consistent attempts to misrepresent facts and your apparent inability (or refusal) to recognize contractual obligations. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100156854120968193 Wow. Pathological. What a colossal waste of time this has become. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100159522293891073 Ran out of money after the AJ contract finished in March 2018? Another blatant lie. We did 9 more 2018 events after that. Quite a feat to do that with no money. Directly quoting someone's Twitter feed and the truth are NOT the same thing. By doing so, you are saying that everything that everything posted on Twitter is categorically true.

another worthless insecure thread from an AJ/Hearn fanatic. what exactly do you guys get out of posting these same things daily???? if my fighter got his azz whooped n then danced around the ring vs a big butter ball id at least humble up, but you guys are on another level Its very hypocritical of you to talk about people being bias towards AJ or Hearn, right before you go off on an anti-Joshua rant about his last two fights. You only responded to the thread because you feel compelled to, as a Wilder fan. What do you get out of replying? Probably the same as the guy starting the thread.

I think your business acumen is a bit f****d up. Turn down 100M and settle for Breazeale and a couple mill. Yeah ok. Does it not spark a little thought in your teeny brain, that maybe, just maybe, he doesn't want it. You best not be directing that at me?

Prize Fight meaning: 1. a boxing match in which people fight to win money . Boxing is the sport to try and win the most money available when it presents itself . Wilder in the sport he’s in has not done that and did the exact opposite to what is usually a fighter taking the highest offers and purses guaranteed to them . Now he can claim money don’t matter which he has but he also cannot claim he really wanted the AJ fight and also make demands which are purposeful to sabotage a fight which he also has done . Again, what's with your weird negative obsession with Wilder? Racism? Anti American ? What? You virtually make no other posts. Why?

Well he did, he was asked by Eddie Hearn to show those terms and he couldnt You're lying. Espinoza stated the contract said Sky got UK rights. Hearn said he was lying, so Espinoza posted a scan of the portion of the contract pertaining to UK rights to prove he was telling the truth and that Hearn was the liar. Hearn then did was he always does and tried to get cute with his phrasing to try to fool UK fanboys. So Hearn said: "Show the contract you sent" Hearn did this for two reasons. #1 - He knew the contract he was sent came from Wilder, not Espinoza, so Espinoza couldn't possibly show the contract he sent, since he's not the one who sent it. #2 - He knew it would be considered incredibly unprofessional by everybody in the industry to post a full contract, so there was no way Espinoza could fulfill Hearn's request without doing incredible damage to himself professionally. UK fanboys fell for Hearn's trick, just like they always do. infact he stopped replying at that point. You're lying. Espinoza continued to reply. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100125303345737728 Never said I sent it. Wilder sent it and you confirmed receipt. "Hearn told ESPN that he had indeed received the offer by email from Wilder's personal account..." https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100126798531256320 Three detailed pages, not one paragraph. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100128918009507840 Mischaracterize much? Never said "we" sent a contract. I said a contract was sent. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100140638388056066 Again, never said "I" sent a contract. And I'm not going to expose private business arrangements in a Twitter discussion. Considering your attempt to deny AJ's 6-fight Showtime deal after just 3 fights, it's not surprising that you wouldn't remember this one either. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100143910163238912 So what do you call the 3-page document you received? An agreement? Deal proposal? Term sheet? It had all the relevant terms necessary to establish an agreement. Remember you thought that the AJ multi-fight deal wasn't a contract either, and you were wrong about that too. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100145189828603904 Didn't release anything that wasn't already public, other than you failed attempt to ignore the agreement you already entered into. You didn't answer the question. A 3-page contract was sent. You said it wasn't. So what do you call the 3-page document that you received? https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100146972428767232 I know what was sent, as do you, since we both received copies. You don't dispute that you received a 3-page document containing the deal terms. For the THIRD time, I'm asking you what you call that 3-page document you received, since you're claiming it's not a contract. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100149791701590021 LOL...the lies continue. You're quite creative. You don't dispute that you received a 3-page document with deal terms, but you don't consider it a contract...just like you didn't consider the AJ multi-fight deal a contract until you got legal advice telling you otherwise. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100153602381893634 No issue with AJ. Just reminding you of your consistent attempts to misrepresent facts and your apparent inability (or refusal) to recognize contractual obligations. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100156854120968193 Wow. Pathological. What a colossal waste of time this has become. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100159522293891073 Ran out of money after the AJ contract finished in March 2018? Another blatant lie. We did 9 more 2018 events after that. Quite a feat to do that with no money.

He wasn't lying. A bunch of UK trolls pretending he's lying doesn't change the truth. You really think the head of a major network is going to go on twitter and post fraudulent documents like that? You're out of your mind. Well he did, he was asked by Eddie Hearn to show those terms and he couldnt, infact he stopped replying at that point. I see what you do now, You keep the biggest spin lies you hear and refuse to accept them as anything less than 100% fact. You are the biggest liar on this forum and im far from the 1st person to say that about you.

Weasel got pulled up on those lies INSTANTLY. He wasn't lying. A bunch of UK trolls pretending he's lying doesn't change the truth. You really think the head of a major network is going to go on twitter and post fraudulent documents like that? You're out of your mind.

Hearn himself confirmed to ESPN Wilder signed and sent a contract...but whatever, the hate for Wilder isn’t logical Some of y’all just hate him cause you know he’s a threat to the guy your backing from holding the crown. Instead you should just enjoy the both fighters talents enjoy the fights and enjoy when they ultimately do fight. I can’t imagine hating someone for no reason so much that you can’t watch and enjoy Wilder absolutely knocking someone into the shadow realm....it’s pathetic

https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100122642902904832 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA. I knew that would be the link. Espi Weasel got pulled up on those lies INSTANTLY. Just like you do.

Sad part is no boxing aficionado can even talk to him about it for fear of being accused of political incorrectness. Of course, they knew who made a huge stink in the negotiations. The Ted Atlases, the Bernsteins, the Larry Merchants, etc. I can't imagine them asking about his greed.

Link, liar. https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/status/1100122642902904832

If money didn't matter, why did he say he declined the DAZN offer because they wouldn't share how much Joshua was getting? Sounds a lot like money to me. I think your business acumen is a bit f****d up. Turn down 100M and settle for Breazeale and a couple mill. Yeah ok. Does it not spark a little thought in your teeny brain, that maybe, just maybe, he doesn't want it.

That is a blatant lie. Wilder's email included a four page short form contract outlining all of the major deal points. Showtime even posted a portion of the contract on Twitter to expose liars like you. Link, liar.

That is a blatant lie. Wilder's email included a four page short form contract outlining all of the major deal points. Showtime even posted a portion of the contract on Twitter to expose liars like you. Not to mention Barry Hearn confirmed it was real also.

Didn't say that. Stop lying. When dealing with a tarded coward and a guy that takes advantage of tarded cowards (Haymon) you need a different approach to normal people.How is the heavyweight champion with 43 pro fights and 96% of his wins by KO a Coward? Grow up you classless baby.