Mayweather wins fighter if the decade yahoo.com

Floyd s last 5 years of decade was spent denying us fights we wanted to see. To show he wanted Fotd h ed have re matched nel o and fought thurman, spence or crawford at least. And even after this Fotd isn't garanteed. Floyd missed out the decade before you'd think he'd leave nothing to chance. But going walkabout last 5 years doesn't give a good sign. Doesn't give anyone confidence, especially flouds fans.

You just made this up. It makes as much sense as jmm beat pac so jmm has to be a more realistic candidate for fotd than pac.? You should stop playing games, you know full we'll flouds not a realistic candidate and you'd be best to predict who you really think it will be out of pac, lomo, nel o or whoever the others are which aren't floyd He beat Marquez too. So what? Like I said, if not Floyd, then Canelo. Prove me wrong.

Again, don't make things up. It's like saying if Pac is candidate for fotd and just because jmm beats pac and jmm didn't lose in decade it must mean jmm is only choice for fotd? Not taking into consideration Pac has better overall resume and wins and win more titles in divisions. Lots of things to consider. Floyd fanboys only consider Floyd has wins over nel o and pac? You're the one making things up here, and if you're going to bring up Marquez then Floyd beat him too.

He beat weight drained common opponents, 25lb difference between Floyds Oscar and Cotto , those version Manny ducked like they had the plague. So its not a problem its a fact Floyd beat the much better versions, and all common opponents said Floyd is the better fighter. You lose on all fronts, Floyd has soul stomped you for half your life lol, and he is still doing it lol. Your argument Floyd is Fotd as he beat 2 candidates for floyd doesn't hold weight. That's counts for nothing when the 2 opponents you beat did more in the decade. Nel o stepped up 2 divisions in one go, he beat ggg, Jacobs all in 4 divisions in a decade. You think that don't Trump flouds win over pac and nelo? Stop kidding yourself.

Only problem is Pac has beat all common opponents more dominant and hasn't only fought 5 years. So Floyd can't have achieved much other than beat pac and nelo He beat weight drained common opponents, 25lb difference between Floyds Oscar and Cotto , those version Manny ducked like they had the plague. So its not a problem its a fact Floyd beat the much better versions, and all common opponents said Floyd is the better fighter. You lose on all fronts, Floyd has soul stomped you for half your life lol, and he is still doing it lol.

I. If JMM had also beaten Mosley Cotto Canelo and not lost a fight he would probably win the award, its not one fight peabrain, its the accomplishments achieved inside the decade. t. Only problem is Pac has beat all common opponents more dominant and hasn't only fought 5 years. So Floyd can't have achieved much other than beat pac and nelo

The difference here is that Floyd beat both of them and didn't lose to anyone else. Like if we're talking Pacquiao or Canelo as FOTD, it's pretty obvious to talk about the guy who has a win over both of them. Again, don't make things up. It's like saying if Pac is candidate for fotd and just because jmm beats pac and jmm didn't lose in decade it must mean jmm is only choice for fotd? Not taking into consideration Pac has better overall resume and wins and win more titles in divisions. Lots of things to consider. Floyd fanboys only consider Floyd has wins over nel o and pac?

You just made this up. It makes as much sense as jmm beat pac so jmm has to be a more realistic candidate for fotd than pac.? You should stop playing games, you know full we'll flouds not a realistic candidate and you'd be best to predict who you really think it will be out of pac, lomo, nel o or whoever the others are which aren't floyd I dont get it how you can be this fcn dumb. If JMM had also beaten Mosley Cotto Canelo and not lost a fight he would probably win the award, its not one fight peabrain, its the accomplishments achieved inside the decade. What are you going to do when Floyd wins the majority of end of decade awards across the globe, he is already winning everything as they come out.

You just made this up. It makes as much sense as jmm beat pac so jmm has to be a more realistic candidate for fotd than pac.? You should stop playing games, you know full we'll flouds not a realistic candidate and you'd be best to predict who you really think it will be out of pac, lomo, nel o or whoever the others are which aren't floyd The difference here is that Floyd beat both of them and didn't lose to anyone else. Like if we're talking Pacquiao or Canelo as FOTD, it's pretty obvious to talk about the guy who has a win over both of them.

He beat Canelo and Pacquiao this decade. He disqualifies both by nature of beating them in the decade? You just made this up. It makes as much sense as jmm beat pac so jmm has to be a more realistic candidate for fotd than pac.? You should stop playing games, you know full we'll flouds not a realistic candidate and you'd be best to predict who you really think it will be out of pac, lomo, nel o or whoever the others are which aren't floyd

ummm if the award is for FOTD, i think you have to compete the decade to win it. you cant do half and then expect to win. that's not how it works buddy. so if lebron was playing good but got injured early in the season and is out for the rest of the games, but he should still win MVP at the end of the year because he was playing so good early on in the season? You dont have to fight 20 matches in 10 years. You have to compete a significant amount of the decade with the most impressive wins. He beat Canelo and Pacquiao this decade. He disqualifies both by nature of beating them in the decade. If not Floyd, then it has to go to Canelo but again, Canelo lost to Floyd who is undefeated and 10 years older. So, who deserves it at that point?

It's almost 2020 and you still hatin on Floyd. Come on dude when you gonna grow up? Dude the article makes a very good point; you guys claim Manny was washed up and done after the JMM ko yet he is 5-1 since the Floyd fight. Honestly, I find it hilarious to watch guys like you, hugh grant, spoon23, paswakyo, and what remains of the delusional, pole-smokin ,f-ckboy fringe manny fans try to isolate him as damaged and washed for that fight then try to tout his continued winning as some type of spiritual resurrection of once great deity. GTFOH! Even better, is to watch you guys try to make Canelo out to be some inexperienced, weak child that couldn't protect himself on the night he fought Floyd. Everyone can't be the best. Someone has to be 2nd. In this case it's Manny. Just give Floyd the credit for beating Manny. Then Manny will get his for beating everyone else. It can't be denied that Pacquiao had a distinct change as a fighter around that time caused by the JMM KO and age, not just one of those but both. He had that ability to pull the trigger fearlessly, the way he would attack with blitzing combinations, take a step back, reset and go for it again. Rinse and repeat. That's the style that would have troubled Floyd the most, and what him and his old man feared the most. By the 2010s though his boxing skills grew substantially along the way though, and after that disastrous 2012 he changed into a skilful boxer who relied on points winning strategies. That was not going to beat Mayweather not even in 2015.

Canelo is a proven cheater. He doesn't deserve ****!. Why are people giving this guy a pass! And since when to a gang of losses like Manny suffered in the decade deserve the award. The bias of some people on this site is mind blowing LOL

Fighting half decade and beating MMA and kick boxer will give you a FOTD award.. :lol1:.. This is the most BS FOTD award in the history of boxing...

The Pac tards are as dumb as ever. They haven't gotten any smarter over the years, I'm sad to see their lack of intellectual growth.

So do you rate Mannys wins over Oscar, Morales, Hatton and Cotto How many ways I gotta explain it. Yeah he gets credit for them. Manny walked thru all of em except Morales. Margarito and Oscar had significant height and reach on Manny. Now please man get some kleenex and blow your nose. Floyd took 10 years to make a fight with Manny. Sat back. Watch him fight wars. Get ko'd. Then decided to stick his toe in the water after the threat was gone. We seen that strategy before with Srl and Hagler. I'm not giving Floyd a bunch of credit for that, but you will because you a 80,000 posts defending Floyd dude.

So do you rate Mannys wins over Oscar, Morales, Hatton and Cotto Pac s stopped them all. Something Floyd couldn't do. Why wouldn't Pac get credit? Floyd don't stop any version of Hatton in 2 rounds, no version of dlh in 7 rounds and no version of cott o in 11rounds. And we don't know if Floyd beats any version of morales.

So do you rate Mannys wins over Oscar, Morales, Hatton and Cotto Incredible wins that catapulted Manny into superstardom. That Cotto fight was pure beauty. Manny tattooed him all night.

No. Your need to defend Floyd with excuses, warps your sense of reality. You pushing 80,000 posts defending floyd So do you rate Mannys wins over Oscar, Morales, Hatton and Cotto

It's over, man. Your favorite fighters tried their best but came up short. Floyd even gave them half of a decade to catch up to him. I mean, he was so far ahead of the pack that he had to retire early just so they would have a fair chance. Sat on his ass for five whole years. And he still won. He didn't sit on his ass bro. Those wins over McGregory and the Japanese midget are what put him over the top. Floyd stayed working.