https://youtu.be/0XNbxsvpCqQ
Marquez rates Crawford No1. Lomanchenko No2. Alavarez No3.
I dont know how many times we have to go over this, Ive told you guys a million times and you can go back to my older post where I state this but, Terence Crawford and Lomanchenko are "GREAT" boxers, Canelo is a "GOOD" boxer. It takes The greatest mexican boxer to ever lace a pair of gloves to make it clear that Terence crawford is better than Canelo.
Now that's a fight Canelo wouldnt have wanted. Ive seen crawford at 180+ lbs.Dude will smoke Canelo at 154-160.
Bro, I get it. You're a Crawford fan. You've followed his career for years.
You sobbed a bit when Gamboa Bambi'd him.
You were were a little worried when you saw Amir Khan pump the jab into his face repeatedly.
You got frustrated when you saw that Crawford's next opponent is Kavaliauskas who you've never heard of, and you were angry when PBC completely ignored the WBO title.
I get it.
"At the end of the day", Crawford has no business Top 5 based on what it "looks like" he "could" do. His resume at 147 is garbage and his resume at 140 was ages ago AND had very few heralded names to boot. And until he accepts his 80/20 B-side split to fight the real fighters - you know, the ones over on PBC - or he decides to move up and challenge himself at 154, it won't change no matter how much you whine. Meanwhile, the WBC Carne Franchise Champion will keep up racking wins against NAMED top tier opponents and collecting belts, doing what Crawford seems incapable of doing recently.
Done.
I guess you want to keep just making yourself look silly?
at this point, dude I dont even care dude. I didnt even watch the Khan Vs Crawford fight, Maybe 4 rounds at most of the Gamboa fight. What you fail to realize is that it doesnt take me years to find out if a boxer possess great boxing skill, I can see that in about 3-4rds of a fighter, unlike yourself. BTW I dont even know Crawford next fight nor who he fighting, because I can care less. You over here acting like someone wants your man, get your panties out your ass.
Hey if you think Canelo is TBE,ATG whatever you wanna call it, Cool, Knock yourself out bro, You look and sound dumb af.
https://youtu.be/0XNbxsvpCqQ
Marquez rates Crawford No1. Lomanchenko No2. Alavarez No3.
I dont know how many times we have to go over this, Ive told you guys a million times and you can go back to my older post where I state this but, Terence Crawford and Lomanchenko are "GREAT" boxers, Canelo is a "GOOD" boxer. It takes The greatest mexican boxer to ever lace a pair of gloves to make it clear that Terence crawford is better than Canelo.
Now that's a fight Canelo wouldnt have wanted. Ive seen crawford at 180+ lbs.Dude will smoke Canelo at 154-160.
PED cheats knows one when he sees one. Marquez needed them to exorcise his demons with Pacquiao and for him it worked, for Canelo thou he got caught so I can see why he rates him behind Crawford because Crawford doesn't have that blemish.
Has Marquez ever heaped praise on a Mexican fighter?
It seems every time he speaks on a Mexican fighter its always in a salty and shady way.
Accurate again, I like Marquez but yes he does this kind of stuff, there's a reason he is not on the 'Box Azteca' team commenting anymore.
Manny Pacquiao isn't #1, but he's Top 5. Unlike Crawford. There's no contradiction. You just can't stop inhaling Crawford's smoke and mirrors.
I dont know who's the dumbest Revelated, HNRY, or Fredrekk
via GIPHY
You've made no point.
This is not about what a fighter "looks like" they could do. I keep telling you people - ALL THAT MATTERS IS YOUR ACCOMPLISHMENTS.
Judging by this logic, Then Manny Pacman should be P4P.
You stated " This dude has now fought from 154 all the way up to 175 " Manny fought from 106 all the way to 147 and held belts in everyone on of those weight classes.
Canelo on the other hand has only held 6 belts and moved up 4 weight divisions vs Pacman who moved up 11 weight classes, from 106 To 147 and held a whopping 12 belts.
You seem to be contradicting yourself alot.
Canelo could move up to HW and beat Wilder, Fury and Joshua and the hater clown full of envy that is JMM wouldn't give him any credit
this is the same jealous doofus that used to say Abner Mares was gonna be much greater than Canelo LOL
Easy.
1. Resume.
2. Resume.
3. Resume.
Or more accurately:
1. Went up TWO weight classes and KO'd a top LHW.
2. Unified middleweight champion NOW, super middleweight champion NOW, LHW champion NOW. All the same time.
3. Has never needed to get his opponents out of there with a low blow. It's either a decision or a KO/TKO. Unlike Crawford.
Are you seriously going to dismiss #2, much less the others?
..............my point exactly lol.
Yeah - a LOWER level.
It's not race baiting bro. It's facts. It cannot be refuted. Carnelo is at the top of the mountain. Marquez is salty for the reasons stated.
What boxing logic do you have my friend?
Name me 3 area's that Canelo excel in better than Craword?
Not IQ, Not Speed, Not defense, Not Reflexes, Not counterpunching, So where do you see Canelo excels in? and where is this logic coming from? your a$$
You have to earn p4p. Everyone ranking Crawford and Loma are basing it off their potential... It doesn't work that way.. They need to face their greater or equal and then we can see how they fair.
Sadly they are too chicken shh*t to do so.
Say what you want about Canelo but he has made it his career to fight top names. And that's why he's the money man. You won't ever make top paper by steam rolling trash your whole career, and you sure as hell don't belong on the top p4p.
Marquez has hated Canelo since 2010.
- -BALCO Juan hates the betters of his era, Canelo, Barrera, Morales, Chris John, and Manny.
Something wrong with a guy inhaling ****tails of his own pee for training.
https://youtu.be/0XNbxsvpCqQ
Marquez rates Crawford No1. Lomanchenko No2. Alavarez No3.
I dont know how many times we have to go over this, Ive told you guys a million times and you can go back to my older post where I state this but, Terence Crawford and Lomanchenko are "GREAT" boxers, Canelo is a "GOOD" boxer. It takes The greatest mexican boxer to ever lace a pair of gloves to make it clear that Terence crawford is better than Canelo.
Now that's a fight Canelo wouldnt have wanted. Ive seen crawford at 180+ lbs.Dude will smoke Canelo at 154-160.
- -Boxrec has Canelo #1 p4p forever and now #1 Lightheavy.
What grade you in?
same Mexican boxer that got handled by every Black fighter he ever faced, especially Freddie Norwood. It doesn't surprise me that he's now cucking for Crawford instead of his own.
My memory is very foggy, but was Derrick Gainer and Joel Casamayor forced to bleach their skin against JMM so that, he wouldn't be so starstruck when he fought them?
same Mexican boxer that got handled by every Black fighter he ever faced, especially Freddie Norwood. It doesn't surprise me that he's now cucking for Crawford instead of his own.
Here we go with a race baiter. It has nothing to do with Color nor ethnicity, I just know boxing, and Crawford is on a whole another level then canelo.
You do realize i am talking about Julio Cesar Chavez sr. Right? Either you werent born when he fought or you are just ignorant. Dude you need to wake up . Chavez by devastation on those 3. Why o you think people talk about what would happen if He fought Duran or Arguello. Seriously!
You must be on some serious drugs over there. Duran would have probably stopped chavez, and arguello would have outboxed him for 12rds. Chavez always had trouble against good boxers, like mildrick taylor, and sweat pea. Honestly I think Aaron Pryor would have stopped him on his feet TKO, but that's just my opinion. Chavez will always be considered one of the Greatest Mexican fighters ever, just like Canelo will be one day too imo, but there were better mexican fighter's like the ones I mentioned earlier, taking nothing away from Chavez, he was a GREAT fighter and one of the Greatest Mexican Fighters to walk to earth, but you can make clear arguement for those others beating him. Finito Lopez was a better fighter than Chavez in all areas, and will always be ranked higher than chavez in my book, as well as Marquez, Barrerra,Morales, and Sanchez.
Canelo has and is being held to a different standard than other elite fighters. People that rank Lomachenko and Crawford ahead of Canelo are placing a heavier emphasis on performance and, to a certain point, deemphasizing opposition.
Lomachenko's best win is Rigondeaux at 130, which would be like Canelo's best win being over Pacquiao at 160. Crawford's best win is one of Gamboa/Postol/Indongo/Horn, which would be like judging Canelo based on his performances against a lesser version of Cotto/Fielding/Liam Smith/JCC Jr.
What Canelo just did is what Lomachenko refuses to do (fight Pacquiao at 147) and what Crawford hasn't publicly considered doing (fight GGG at 160). Canelo just did an equivalent of that and stopped him. He is the best P4P.
Exactly this ^