Havent seen a thread on this

Spence did not go away unscathed , that’s not what I’m saying I saw Spence do more damage with his shots , especially to the body , just fughin brutal Porter without doubt is one tough sob Someone else would of at least taken a knee on some of those shots Do you mean the lowblows or were there some brutal legal shots? I gave Porter the first 3, thought nicked the first, won the 2nd, and the 3rd pretty clear too, early Spence didn’t seem to land much at all, and when he did land something Porter usually got him right back with his own big shot. The third rd About 90% of Spence’s punches were lowblows and rabbit punches, he didn’t score many legal shots at all.

Spence didn’t make the “Adjustments” that I thought he would make, he fought Porter’s fight and still won that fight. But watching that fight just made me smile and appreciate Mayweather even more.

You haven't seen a thread on it because it isn't true or accurate even though you have now put up at least two threads saying it did. Did you lose a bet on Porter? You are working overtime saying how great Porter is and how lousy Spence is. But Spence got the job done. I don't know if you lost money on Porter or not. I believe Spence will beat any welterweight he fights. Trash him all you want but he is undefeated and I think he will stay undefeated.

Awful lot of talk about what Spence couldn't do. He still landed 211 punches to Porter's 172 punches and landed more punches and power punches than Porter in 10 of the 12 rounds. Lots of stuff about Spence lacking power after not KOing Mikey but he dropped rugged Porter late in the fight and dominated the championship rounds 11 and 12. I think Spence beats all welterweights. Some may put up a good fight but he beats them. My money is on Spence no matter who it is at 147.

I saw porter landing harder punches more often. Yeah spence is more accurate and landed a few hard ones. But porter visably bothered Spence on more occasions. How do you “visibly bother” a fighter better than knocking them off their feet?

Right. But add that porter made it his fight (ring generalship), being the aggressor and landing the harder more telling shots. Porter So you’re saying Spence beat Porter at his own game? Takes a helluva fighter to do that.

Thanks fixed it. I know you don't have an agenda. I was more making fun of you having the same outcome as judge Hazzard, who is incompetent. Right on got that too, but i dont really think you are in a position to insult me so i let it slide.

I saw porter landing harder punches more often. Yeah spence is more accurate and landed a few hard ones. But porter visably bothered Spence on more occasions. Spence did not go away unscathed , that’s not what I’m saying I saw Spence do more damage with his shots , especially to the body , just fughin brutal Porter without doubt is one tough sob Someone else would of at least taken a knee on some of those shots

115-112... Thanks fixed it. No agenda just my opinions. I know you don't have an agenda. I was more making fun of you having the same outcome as judge Hazzard, who is incompetent.

Porter and Spence threw about the same number of punches. Spence landed far more shots and scored a knocked down. Porter fought a hell of a fight but no way did he win. The judge that had Porter winning 116-112 is the same judge that had Charlo beating Korobov 119-108. So anyone scoring this fight for Porter either has an agenda against Spence or scores fights like Larry Hazzard Jr. LOL!! Spence didn't lose just because he didn't perform as expected pre fight. I honestly don't know how anyone could give this fight to Porter. Nothing but credit to Porter for a great fight. No agenda just my opinions.

I agreed with you until the landing part Spence was the one with the more telling shots and with precision Porter got some good shots in but many of them were loopy, wide shots And it’s kind of hard to be precise when your head is down most of the time ( cause of his bull rushing ) I mentioned the old spinerama move the night of the fight If only Porter had some power , Spence would of been the loser I saw porter landing harder punches more often. Yeah spence is more accurate and landed a few hard ones. But porter visably bothered Spence on more occasions.

porter and spence threw about the same number of punches. Spence landed far more shots and scored a knocked down. Porter fought a hell of a fight but no way did he win. The judge that had porter winning 116-112 is the same judge that had charlo beating korobov 119-108. So anyone scoring this fight for porter either has an agenda against spence or scores fights like larry hazzard jr. Lol!! Spence didn't lose just because he didn't perform as expected pre fight. I honestly don't know how anyone could give this fight to porter. Nothing but credit to porter for a great fight. 115-112...

Porter is STRONG...VERY STRONG! He fought at 165 in the Amateurs so he is very comfortable going up against "Bigger Guys" so yeah he Spun and Pushed Spence Jr against the Ropes a few times. Some excellent inside fighting from BOTH, yeah some head clashes and low blows was thrown too BUT both kept fighting which made it a Excellent Fight

Right. But add that porter made it his fight (ring generalship), being the aggressor and landing the harder more telling shots. Porter I agreed with you until the landing part Spence was the one with the more telling shots and with precision Porter got some good shots in but many of them were loopy, wide shots And it’s kind of hard to be precise when your head is down most of the time ( cause of his bull rushing ) I mentioned the old spinerama move the night of the fight If only Porter had some power , Spence would of been the loser

Right. But add that porter made it his fight (ring generalship), being the aggressor and landing the harder more telling shots. Porter Porter and Spence threw about the same number of punches. Spence landed far more shots and scored a knocked down. Porter fought a hell of a fight but no way did he win. The judge that had Porter winning 115-112 is the same judge that had Charlo beating Korobov 119-108. So anyone scoring this fight for Porter either has an agenda against Spence or scores fights like Larry Hazzard Jr. LOL!! Spence didn't lose just because he didn't perform as expected pre fight. I honestly don't know how anyone could give this fight to Porter. Nothing but credit to Porter for a great fight.

It was a close fight. It was a good fight. But that looked just like a Porter fight, that fight was played to his tune, Spence couldnt control and distance Porter so he just met him head on. Spence did a good job on the outside in the first 2 rounds. I think he wanted to fight Porter in the pocket though. He obliged Porter there. Porter did an excellent job not getting stuck in the corner and on the ropes though.

That was cool but that doesn't mean Porter won the fight. Right. But add that porter made it his fight (ring generalship), being the aggressor and landing the harder more telling shots. Porter

But what about how Porter spinned Spence WHEN EVER he WANTED on the ropes. Lol. Spence couldn't counter the spin at all Porter, youre the real MVP!!! That was cool but that doesn't mean Porter won the fight.

It was a close fight. It was a good fight. But that looked just like a Porter fight, that fight was played to his tune, Spence couldnt control and distance Porter so he just met him head on.