honestly these two were more alike than most people think. both were pretty **** in everything except having the speed and power to carry them both through their legendary careers.
Just asking to be sure because the OP is claiming he had a terrible technique.
It just shows the OP like most of the posters on here know nothing about boxing.
You claim he doesn't? It think its you who KDSAB. show me 1 video of roy where he shows great technique
honestly these two were more alike than most people think. both were pretty **** in everything except having the speed and power to carry them both through their legendary careers.
Pacquaio learns different type of martial art and applies that **** to his boxing. It's why he throw punches from weird angles
Pacquiao has better fundamentals, and is an overall better boxer. Roy did a lot of things wrong (much like Ali) but his reflexes, speed and power carried him through. Fighters like Roy need to make adjustments as they slow down a step. They can no longer fight with their hands at their sides or lean away from punches, as he found out the hard way.
actually no. yall need to stop dissing the pacman. someone who doesnt have good skills but only has speed will not be around for this long or wouldnt have accomplished what he did. there's lots of guys out there that are lightning fast. amir khan, broner, rigo, etc. none of them comes close to manny. why is that? you said pac have flaw skills and only rely on his speed.