Another "Fighter of the Decade Award" for Manny Pacquiao?

Floyd is one of the top contenders, along with Canelo. Even the hater Thomas Hauser had to admit that. https://www.sportingnews.com/us/boxing/news/fighter-of-the-decade-2010-2019-who-will-deserve-the-honor/1kcxaffmsrwi715zdlfxzl7ooi Well, Canelo at 22-1-1 and GGG at 20-1-1 have the best argument .

Wait, is someone arguing Floyd should get FOTD award ? He only fought just over half the decade and he gets FOTD? Pls no arguing he fought in 2017.

None is more worthy than pac for this award. BACK TO BACK FOTD....

You dreaming again you braindead moron. Manny = 145 Oscar 145 Cotto and Coke habit Hatton, iced by JMM. Floyd = 163 Oscar 154 Cotto, prime undefeated Hatton and schooled JMM like an amatuer. Add beating Canelo and Manny and there is no way Manny competes with Floyd . Post their resume from 2010 till now lol. Oscar at 145 Are you ******ed, he weight 147 for that fight. Oscar CHERRY PICKED PACQUIAO (he was coming up TWO WEIGHT CLASSES) and EVERY PUNDIT proclaimed Pac was out of his depth and was going to get bullied around by the "bigger man". Cotto was 1 pound under 147 stop lying. Floyd MADE HATTON come up in weight while Pacquiao FOUGHT HIM AT HIS ACTUAL 140 WEIGHT CLASS. Floyd can keep his 0 besides that the world doesn't give a **** about him (as seen in England when females had no clue who he is). Pacquaio on the other hand is a world wide Icon. Oh and Padding your record with a 0-0 mma fighter makes you even more of a ho. Its ok thou in 10 years time will see Floyd on an episode of Intervention crying like Rocky Lockridge (RIP).

Exactly, how do you sign up for random 360 testing to convince the world how Ped clean you are and they dont test you leading into a very big fight, that takes some under the table envelopes to achieve, I agree with you a real bench mark for Manny. Excepted he was tested, Already been confirmed keep peddling that lie thou.

I keep asking Pac fans to name the 2010-2019 names and all I get are deflections.....If anyone came out on top of the Pac vs JMM fights its definitely JMM. Is there a fight where one can say Pac definitely beat him ?!?!? May beat Pac so thoroughly, Pac had to invent an injury. "Remove JMM and Mays name and Pac's list of opponents are mostly jokes" You apply the term jokes on pac's list of opponents....and I asked you who really is the joke... you did not answer directly..so who now is deflecting? Now, if you really understand what happened in pac vs jmm 1...one judge erred in his scoresheet...and the result was a draw...but should be a win for pac....

May is older and that operation is shady AF. Pac's 2010-2019 resume is also shady AF Just as shady as TBE's (not The Best Ever) excessive IV intake, and resume as well (wait, everyone's resume is shady AF)... True...

anyone who got bullied, battered and bloodied by Jeff friggin Horn in that same decade doesn't deserve to be in the discussion at all :rofl:

May beat Pac so thoroughly, Pac had to invent an injury. GrandPac had an operation right after the fight... Too much IV fluids for the other fighter...

Pacquiao-Bradley 3 happened April 2016... The following were the consensus Top 3 guys by several ranking boards such as TBRB, The Ring, ESPN and WBN with their opponents from April 2014 up that day: Pacquiao: Mayweather, Algieri, Bradley 2 Bradley: Rios, Vargas, Chaves, Pacquiao 2 Brook: Bizier, Gavin, Dan, Porter, Robles

you're just absolutely wrong on so many things. No actually I'm not. Pacquaio was coming off a loss and Bradley was 2-1-1 in his last 4. These are facts. How can they possibly be the universal best two in the division at the time? They weren't. The division was as wide open as it gets.

How many times did Pac take an L these past 10 years ?!?!?! ''L's don't matter :grumble:.....'' Remove JMM and Mays name and Pac's list of opponents are mostly jokes "Remove JMM and Mays name and Pac's list of opponents are mostly jokes" Pac and JMM fought 4 times...the people watched excitedly..(the 4 times they fought is indicative of the people's interest in their fights) Pac and other fighters fought..the people watched excitedly..(pac vs bradley 3 times...same as above) Pac and floyd fought.....the people slept...and... Pac beat thurman at 40...so floyd won't do a rematch the question now is...who is the joke?

Yes they did actually. On two seperate occasions. 2007 Baldomir and 2010 Mosley. The reason why Pacquaio 2015 was his 3rd time was because of his inactivity between 2010 and 2011. I'm aware of their recognition for his reign from 2006-2008, but they didn't recognize Mosley-Margarito fight as a championship... It is the Lineal record-keeper CBZ who recognize it...

TBRB didn't recognize TBE (not The Best Ever) as the Lineal champion until he defeated GrandPac... Yes they did actually. On two seperate occasions. 2007 Baldomir and 2010 Mosley. The reason why Pacquaio 2015 was his 3rd time was because of his inactivity between 2010 and 2011.

Ok and TBRB also said Floyd beat Mosley for the Lineage TBRB didn't recognize TBE (not The Best Ever) as the Lineal champion until he defeated GrandPac...

Who do you think is going to win or should win? No one stands out but I'd imagine they'd probably give it Canelo. Lomachenko if they take into consideration Amatuer career.

completely wrong. bradley only loss to a legend pacquiao (no shame). should have won against chaves. pac only loss to mayweather becuase of having a bad shoulder. no shame. floyd retired. no one else at welterweight accomplished anything of note. brook only had an inexperienced porter. thurman hadn't done anything. pac ranked #1 and bradley ranked #2 by every credible boxing organization in the entire world. transnational boxing ratings board (tbrb) comprises of over 50 well establish trustworthy highly experienced boxing journalists historians and scribes. all decided pac was lineal. i'll take tbrb word and knowledge over 1 pea brain on some internet forum. Actually no Bradley was not universally ranked #2 on all lists. Neither was Pacquaio either. Bradley was 2-1-1 in his last 4 that's a fact. He drew with Chavez. Ok and TBRB also said Floyd beat Mosley for the Lineage and they were wrong then too just as they are for Pacquaio being Lineal at 147. It is totally illogical to say Pacquauo and Bradley were UNIVERSALLY considered #1 and #2 at WW when thw division was literally wide open at the time.

He could go and get a time machine and beat a prime Ray Robinson and he still wouldn’t win Fighter of the decade. Who do you think is going to win or should win?

thurman, porter and brook had no significant wins at the time. bradley was without a doubt the true #2. pac #1, bradley #2 and lineal vacated by floyd when he retired. pac won and therefore won his 5th lineal. many credible organizations within sports and boxing recognize pac as a 5 weight lineal champion. factual truth. Nah. WW was wide open. Literally. Bradley was 2-1-1 in his last 4 and Pacquaio was coming off a loss. So there is literally no way there were the universal #1 and #2. So nah, Pacquaio wasn't Lineal at 147. It's totally illogical.

And MAB was easily top 10 p4p then. Let's not forget NOBODY picked Pac to win that fight . The betting odds was easily 3-1 MAB. But, since Pac beat him, MAB was not in prime . lol MAB then went on and won another belt at 130. Barrera was no1 or no2 pfp. These clowns try belittle unbeaten, prime young lion, naturally bigger by some way Thurman as a great win as he looked shaky in last fight? And they also belittle barrera coming off 8 winning streak wins looking great. So they've got excuses for every occasion, got every area covered