So Manny beats the No.1 WW and.....

But Broner also lost to Garcia who Spence destroyed............ Right, but you do realize that Spence is Roy Jones' size right? And Spence couldn't even KO him while landing, what, like 300 plus punches?

Lmao Doubt it You've been following boxing that long and dont know how rankings work? Lol I've said all that I've got to say to you chump :newbie:

Tua is Buboy in real life so the "disrespectful" comment is definitely misplaced Definitely not Buboy lol

I've been following boxing so long I'm emotional and cry over rankings because I don't understand how it works

I can guarantee that I've followed boxing longer, watched more fights and know more about this sport than you or anyone else you know. Of course its just my opinion. Wtf do you think any of us are here for ya fkn moron? The difference is that i have FACTS that support my opinion! I've stated them many times in my thread. And also, Manny is in FACT ranked ahead of Crawford in the ESPN rankings, which is also a panel of boxing experts. mr. genius. Now, go fck yourself you disrespectful c@nt Lmao Doubt it You've been following boxing that long and dont know how rankings work? Lol

I can guarantee that I've followed boxing longer, watched more fights and know more about this sport than you or anyone else you know. Of course its just my opinion. Wtf do you think any of us are here for ya fkn moron? The difference is that i have FACTS that support my opinion! I've stated them many times in my thread. And also, Manny is in FACT ranked ahead of Crawford in the ESPN rankings, which is also a panel of boxing experts. mr. genius. Now, go fck yourself you disrespectful c@nt Tua is Buboy in real life so the "disrespectful" comment is definitely misplaced

Uh huh You're complaining about the opinions of ppl that follow boxing for a living They've forgotten more fights than your ask has even seen highlights off Rankings are just opinions Opinions from boxing ppl who know a lot more than your dumbass Deal with it, crybaby I can guarantee that I've followed boxing longer, watched more fights and know more about this sport than you or anyone else you know. Of course its just my opinion. Wtf do you think any of us are here for ya fkn moron? The difference is that i have FACTS that support my opinion! I've stated them many times in my thread. And also, Manny is in FACT ranked ahead of Crawford in the ESPN rankings, which is also a panel of boxing experts. mr. genius. Now, go fck yourself you disrespectful c@nt

Arent most rankings based on opinion? Unless you have a computer ranking like boxrec or something. And those are even more wrong than opinion based rankings. my bad...i was not so clear cut on my earlier post.. what i really mean is that opinions of those responsible for the ranking must be fights results oriented...based on concluded fights....rather than on their opinions on WHO would win in a possible match up...say between pac vs spence or pac vs crawford....i can't recall how many in NSB call that kind of fight....i just can't fathom why rankings have to be based not on results of actual fights but on imagined outcome of what if fights...

I think the govt passed a law that says if u have a loss on your record to Jeff horn, you can never be ranked #1 in that division ever again :dance: :rofl::rofl::rofl:

Keith Thurman wasnt the number one welterweight you reject His argument is Keith Thurman was #1 3 yrs ago :dance:

Manny is 41 yrs old And this idiot wants to rank him like its 2008

Yeah, a loss to Bradley and Horn never happened and he just beat Thurman. Don't be dumb......if you can help it, of course. Uh huh You're complaining about the opinions of ppl that follow boxing for a living They've forgotten more fights than your ask has even seen highlights off Rankings are just opinions Opinions from boxing ppl who know a lot more than your dumbass Deal with it, crybaby

Keith Thurman wasnt the number one welterweight you reject He was prior to his injury and nothing anyone else has done has proven that anyone else is better, aside from Manny. Spence and Crawford's records at WW are garbage. Nice screen name. Fitting for you

Losses to Jeff horn, floyd, marquez, Bradley 2,4,7 years ago doesn't matter Wins over cotto, clottey 9-10 years ago do :dance: Dont forget ray Leonard's run in the 1980s Put sugar gay #1 at ww Yeah, a loss to Bradley and Horn never happened and he just beat Thurman. Don't be dumb......if you can help it, of course.

.....He is ranked 3rd by The Ring mag! lol How is it that he beats a better, higher ranked fighter than either Crawford or Spence ever have at WW but they are ranked ahead of him? I don't think so. Let's examine Spence's best 3 WW wins..... 1) Brook, who was shot after the GGG fight and did little before that really. 2) Garcia, who had never even fought WW and was a dwarf compared to Spence. 3) Lamont Peterson.....do I even need to mention him? Mediocre at best. Ok, now Crawford's.... 1) Horn, who Manny already beat. 2) Khan, who is old news trash, easy to hit with a China chin. 3) Benavidez......who? Has zero good wins. So he's done very, very little at WW. Now, let's examine Manny's last 3.... 1) Thurman.....No.1 WW, the rest is self explanatory. 2) Broner, who on any given day can be a WW titlist and had drew with Jessie Vargas in his previous fight. 3) Mattysse ...world champ with an obvious reputation. Now, who really deserves to be the #1 WW? It's Manny and there's no denying that in my mind. If you have another opinion on it, let's discuss civilly. Thanks. Keith Thurman wasnt the number one welterweight you reject

Losses to Jeff horn, floyd, marquez, Bradley 2,4,7 years ago doesn't matter Wins over cotto, clottey 9-10 years ago do :dance: Dont forget ray Leonard's run in the 1980s Put sugar gay #1 at ww

"Because ring rankings are based on the opinions of a group of individuals? They think Spence and Crawford can beat pacquiao." So the rankings are not based on fight results or depth of performance but more on opinions? Boxing is really not immune from politics!? Arent most rankings based on opinion? Unless you have a computer ranking like boxrec or something. And those are even more wrong than opinion based rankings.

My top three WW 1. Spence 2. Pacquiao 3. Crawford

Thurman was no1 WW, he had resume and was the man to beat, sure he had time off, but floyds layoffs were as long. Sure he had injuries but so did Pac it's part and parcel. Sure he had under par performance but he won. Humans aren't machines can't you have an off night? Give him the respect for wins, and let spence or crawford beat the champion. Nobody wants this triangle theory trash, Crawford beat horn who beat pac? Drives you mad. OK, horn robbed Pac but don't then rub it in. Crawford beating horn is no big feal, Thurman would beat horn Good post. Well done

Terrence Crawford is the number 1 Welterweight. Spence is number 2 and Manny has a good argument for number 3 now. Who did Crawford beat to get that distinction, then?