"harder to be 8 division champ than being 50-0" says robert garcia

And among Floyds resume he never fought a prime A level fighter. I don’t know when you started watching boxing so I can’t blame you on your ignorance. Floyd fought mostly champions or guys coming off their biggest wins except ZAB JUDAH who had lost to Baldomir.

well, if anyone knows which feat is more difficult, it's Robert Garcia.

It's more impressive when you win titles in 3 to 4 weight classes fighting guys at their full weight without catch-weights. It's easy to be an 8 division champ when you use steroids, avoid drug tests and drain your opponents with a catch-weight.

Robert Garcia speaking the truth as usual. One of the wisest men in boxing.

if pac was undefeated id understand. swear he has 7 loses and 3 draws. depends whos on the resume. i think he hates floyd.

pac did not win titles in 8 divisions..stop lying.

Among those zeroes on Mayweather’s resume is Pacquiao’s name so does it matter? Being 8 division isn’t the point, the question is how did you get those divisions? Did you drain the people in those divisions or were your challenges legitimate? If all you did were catch weights then sorry we don’t care about your bloated record.

There was a 3 year gap from when Cotto fought Manny and when he fought Floyd. And at a heavier weight class Cotto was not used goods. Unlike the 1 year gap from when Marg beat his face with bricks and then Manny decided to fight him. THAT is used goods. Also you're going to being up used goods and forget that Manny fought Hatton after Floyd already KO'd him? That's two common opponents manny had advantages over should I go on? *micdrop If Pac beat Anthony Joshua and Josh lost and Joshs reason for losing was he underestimated Pac, youl would use what Josh said to underrate Pacs win. Your a Floyd fan you see and cant be taken seriously. Cotto being at a heavier weight class of 154 doesn't magically make the beatings he took of margarita and Pac disappear. The beatdowns are scars that don't disappear from fighting at 154. Cottos bests wins are at 147 so why would anyone give Floyd credit for beating a Cotto whos best wins are at 147? Hatton improved from his loss to Floyd. Pac beat Hatton at hattons best weight. Pac would beat any version of hatton in under 5 rounds. Floyd wouldn't beat any version of hatton in 2 rounds. Floyds wins haven't aged well. Any unbiased person can see that. Floyds win over Nelo hasn't aged well like Floyd fans imply. He beat weakest version to ever step in ring.

Pac has the size of a lightweight who wants to test the middleweight and he found out that the weight difference is too much for him, while floyd who was already a champion and fought several times at 154lbs but he still drained canelo at a CW 152lbs, that's the worst CW in the history of the sport. :lol1: MW wtf you dreaming about lol , Why didnt Manny fight Cotto at 154, Manny called Cotto out and Cotto said no CW and Manny ran away . So Cottos CW was good and the bigger Canelo having the same 2lb CW was bad, hmmm thats interesting. You cant even figure out that 2lb is a greater loss for Cotto than 2lb is for Canelo, and its obvious Manny knows the weight factor was why he beat Cotto the first time and will have nothing to do with him without a CW, same Cotto isnt it lol. Its obvious you really know nothing off boxing and it shows badly just a typical fanboy with a hero, one of Arums dumb rock fans that you just push the way you want them to go.

How do you refuse to fight the 154 champ without a CW and then fight a exiled 147 guy at 150 for a vacant 154 title lol. Thats one title that is totally fake and shows the trickery involved, others have CWs and asterisks on them, but you dont see this fine print do you because youre a real boxing guy right, lol . Pac has the size of a lightweight who wants to test the middleweight and he found out that the weight difference is too much for him, while floyd who was already a champion and fought several times at 154lbs but he still drained canelo at a CW 152lbs, that's the worst CW in the history of the sport. :lol1:

And he did neither of those feats.

What is much harder is the 8 division champion and also a 5 division lineal champion that's insane. How do you refuse to fight the 154 champ without a CW and then fight a exiled 147 guy at 150 for a vacant 154 title lol. Thats one title that is totally fake and shows the trickery involved, others have CWs and asterisks on them, but you dont see this fine print do you because youre a real boxing guy right, lol .

What is much harder is the 8 division champion and also a 5 division lineal champion that's insane.

No. You will find Floyd had advantages with common opponents. With Hatton Floyd had fight at 147 a weight Hatton proved to struggle with and had home advantage and ref looking out for lil Floyd. Cotto was battle worn from loss to pac, never be the same again in most eyes at the time. So why is that idea suddenly reversed when Floyd decides to fight PACs used goods? PAC stepped up 2 divisions for dlh. Of course after the beatings dlh and Hatton took they might want to make excuses for poor performance they don't want legacy ruined after all. But when PAC says he's injured with bad shoulder you don't want to know Youre so full of sht, Hatton was bigger than Floyd we been over it 100 times and you still sing the same BS . Hatton fighting Floyd weighed the same that he was beating KT 153lbs , FM was 151. Hatton was 159 against Collazo and said he would never be that heavy again, he never was, it wasnt 140 or 147 , it was 153 and 159, ironically the difference between WW fight night weight and Jnr WW fight night weight. Floyd beat the best Hatton to ever set foot in a ring and both fighters were Jnr WWs fighting for a WW title, they just didnt dry out to make 140- thats all. Understand weight and boxing and you will see so much clearer with what happens.

It depends on the divisions and the champions who are holding the titles. None are equal, some are harder than other and usually it's the historic belts (MW, LW, etc) rather than the super and light titles that have the ringers holding the titles.

No. You will find Floyd had advantages with common opponents. With Hatton Floyd had fight at 147 a weight Hatton proved to struggle with and had home advantage and ref looking out for lil Floyd. Cotto was battle worn from loss to pac, never be the same again in most eyes at the time. So why is that idea suddenly reversed when Floyd decides to fight PACs used goods? PAC stepped up 2 divisions for dlh. Of course after the beatings dlh and Hatton took they might want to make excuses for poor performance they don't want legacy ruined after all. But when PAC says he's injured with bad shoulder you don't want to know There was a 3 year gap from when Cotto fought Manny and when he fought Floyd. And at a heavier weight class Cotto was not used goods. Unlike the 1 year gap from when Marg beat his face with bricks and then Manny decided to fight him. THAT is used goods. Also you're going to being up used goods and forget that Manny fought Hatton after Floyd already KO'd him? That's two common opponents manny had advantages over should I go on? Dont worry I will. Oscar DelaHoya entered the ring weighing LESS then manny. You dont need an excuse when you have IV track marks on your arms, and pointed out by Freddy. That's 3 opponents... need another one? Shane Mosely.... And no I don't believe Mannys shoulder because every loss he has ever had he makes an excuse. If he was humble maybe once in his career you could believe him, but hes a bull**** artist first. *micdrop

Evidence shows that Pacquiao had insane advantages over the common opponents that Floyd did not. Evidence shows that Pacquiao actually lost to one of those common opponents. ALSO evidence shows that in a head to head fight Floyd won 100% of the time. *mic drop No. You will find Floyd had advantages with common opponents. With Hatton Floyd had fight at 147 a weight Hatton proved to struggle with and had home advantage and ref looking out for lil Floyd. Cotto was battle worn from loss to pac, never be the same again in most eyes at the time. So why is that idea suddenly reversed when Floyd decides to fight PACs used goods? PAC stepped up 2 divisions for dlh. Of course after the beatings dlh and Hatton took they might want to make excuses for poor performance they don't want legacy ruined after all. But when PAC says he's injured with bad shoulder you don't want to know

Robert Garcia is just mad he ducked the **** out of floyd

pac can beat mcgregor with one hand tied behind his back 😂😂too bad he couldn't beat Floyd with both his hands!

But we know your a little biased. Go with evidence. Evidence shows Pac beats common opponents more dominantly. Anything else is pure speculation and fantasy. So Pac stops nelo, he deals with drained fighters without mercy, ie cotto, dlh, margarito Evidence points to this. Evidence shows that Pacquiao had insane advantages over the common opponents that Floyd did not. Evidence shows that Pacquiao actually lost to one of those common opponents. ALSO evidence shows that in a head to head fight Floyd won 100% of the time. *mic drop