1. Crawford
2. Loma
3. Canelo
4. Usyk
5. AJ
6. Pacquiao
7. GGG
8. Spence
9. Jacobs
10. Benavidez (168)
i have benavidez strictly off eye test and i see him wipin out the whole division with ease.
i have jacobs because theres a case he beat both canelo n lil g.
Pacquiao because he has no business fighting thurman at this stage.. yet he is.
AJ because he has best resume at HW even though i see a wilder right hand folding him in half.
Usyk because.. obvious. Wiped out his division.
Canelo dont get top spot to me because all his best wins have too much controversy. i have him clearly beating trout, cotto and lara doe.. but its not what i think.. its the general consensus that most of his wins are debatable that keeps him off #1 to me.
Crawford n Loma are the best of the best. Period
true true ..WK was faded BUT the version that showed up that night turned back the clock. it was a great win. u gotta give the man props for standing on top of his division and thats AJ right now.
I definitely agree but he does have Wilder and Fury problems to be sure
I know it's a lot of Mexicans on here, but there aint no way in hell I can put a guy who possibly should have 5 losses and flunked 2 drug tests at the top of a P4P list.
I got Bud #1 because he has definitively won all of his fights, completely unified a division, and is a champ in 3 different weight classes.
Loma's the most skilled fighter in the world, but has lost a fight and hasn't even fought 20 times yet.
I put Canelo 3rd because even though I think he's a cheater that ducked GGG, lost twice to GGG, and Lara and definitively lost to Mayweather, he showed against Jacobs, that he is special and has to be given some credit for fighting tough fights.
You have him top 5, that's nuts. Beating old, faded WK and AP just doesn't get him that much credit.
true true ..WK was faded BUT the version that showed up that night turned back the clock. it was a great win. u gotta give the man props for standing on top of his division and thats AJ right now.
1. Terrance Crawford
2. Canelo
3. Lomachenko
4. Errol Spence
5. Juan "El Gallo" Estrada
6. AJ
7. Usyk
8. Inuo (Japanese cat)
9. Pacquiao
10. GGG
The last two is just me not really knowing who else, clearly i am not an expert but that's my opinion...
Beating top guys in close decisions >>>>> Dominating guys who you are massive favorites over
Sorry, but Bud and Loma can NOT be above Canelo. Resume doesn't even come close to the KING
I don't often agree with you but I agree with you here. Canelo has to be no. 1. AND im not a fan of Canelo at all but hes my top guy right now
1. Saul "Canelo" Alvarez
2. Terrence "Bud" Crawford
3. Keith "One Time" Thurman
4. Errol "The Truth" Spence Jr.
5. Manny "Pacman" Pacquiao
6. Vasyl "Hit-Tek" Lomachenko
7. Deontay "The Bronze Bomber" Wilder
8. Tyson "Gypsy King" Fury
9. Anthony "The Rent Collector" Joshua
10. Dmitry Bivol
11. Devin "New Money" Haney (had to throw him in cuz he might be the future)
why Saunders????? Because he is from your country? All he ever did was edge out Eubank and defend his title by winning on points over guys GGG had already knocked cold. I don't think you will ever see him on anybody else's list but it's your list. If Fury had rematched Wilder and won that would be good but he chickened out to fight cherry picks. Yes his next opponent is undefeated but he is not even top 20. I'll bet he fights another cherry pick after this one.
Stop being racist against gypsies.
A great batamweight is a great fighter just like a great fighter of any other weight. If some random journeyman folds or schools Inoue I'll drop him. Until he loses if ever I rate him highly. I think he looks like a monster because he is a monster.
i
You didn't address my point,Inoues not done anything much yet to be ranked so highly. Koing journeyman at bantamweight means nothing. Consider this many fighters at lower divisions who are ranked very highly still drive cabs & aren't even full time fighters ffs.(bless their hearts for persevering though)
AJ has the best resume at HW by a mile.. but like i said i think a Wilder right hand folds him. but where we stand now he belongs top 10. Why not ?
You have him top 5, that's nuts. Beating old, faded WK and AP just doesn't get him that much credit.
Anybody who has Spence over Inoue should be embarrassed.Just because you are a Spence hater doesn't mean we must all share your opinion. I am a big fan of both Spence and Inoue and proud to be a fan of two fighters I think are great.
Lmao at whoever has inoue ranked so highly. I never rate bantamweights or thereabout weightclasses the same way for the simple fact that they are the type of fighters who look like "monsters" but get folded or schooled by some random journeyman oftentimes out of nowhere; esp. when still untested relatively. Inoue is a great fighter don't get me wrong but how in the hell can he be ranked above fighters like Canelo or Spence,or even Fury or AJ? Inoue shouldn't be anything higher than lower top 10 if your being generousA great batamweight is a great fighter just like a great fighter of any other weight. If some random journeyman folds or schools Inoue I'll drop him. Until he loses if ever I rate him highly. I think he looks like a monster because he is a monster.
i
01.) Vasyl Lomachenko
02.) Tyson Fury
03.) Oleksandr Usyk
04.) Billy Joe Saunders
05.) Saul Alvarez
06.) Gennady Golovkin
07.) Terence Crawford
08.) Oleksandr Gvozdyk
09.) Errol Spence Jr.
10.) Callum Smith
why Saunders????? Because he is from your country? All he ever did was edge out Eubank and defend his title by winning on points over guys GGG had already knocked cold. I don't think you will ever see him on anybody else's list but it's your list. If Fury had rematched Wilder and won that would be good but he chickened out to fight cherry picks. Yes his next opponent is undefeated but he is not even top 20. I'll bet he fights another cherry pick after this one.
1. Crawford
2. Loma
3. Canelo
4. Usyk
5. AJ
6. Pacquiao
7. GGG
8. Spence
9. Jacobs
10. Benavidez (168)
i have benavidez strictly off eye test and i see him wipin out the whole division with ease.
i have jacobs because theres a case he beat both canelo n lil g.
Pacquiao because he has no business fighting thurman at this stage.. yet he is.
AJ because he has best resume at HW even though i see a wilder right hand folding him in half.
Usyk because.. obvious. Wiped out his division.
Canelo dont get top spot to me because all his best wins have too much controversy. i have him clearly beating trout, cotto and lara doe.. but its not what i think.. its the general consensus that most of his wins are debatable that keeps him off #1 to me.
Crawford n Loma are the best of the best. PeriodSure. Let's argue. 1st GGG 2nd Canelo 3rd Spence 4th Loma 5th Crawford 6th Inoue 7th Bivol 8th the Mexican who just beat the champ from Thailand who's name I forget. 9th I'll go along with Benavidez. He looks great. 10th Callum Smith. I go by how good they are in the weight class they fight in today. PFP is how good they are for their weight class right now. It's not resume. I see no case for Jacobs beating GGG or Canelo. He clearly got his ass kicked both fights. Canelo easily beat him and he only won 3 rounds when Canelo ran out of gas. To me GGG is still the world's best middleweight and I think he won every fight he ever had including both Canelo fights. I think he beat Canelo in a third fight if Canelo fights him before he turns 39. The rest of the middleweights can't beat either GGG or Canelo. Uysk is a heavyweight now and must be ranked as one. I don't think he is pfp as a heavyweight. Pacquiao fights as a welterweight. Unless you think he can beat welterweights like Spence and Crawford he doesn't belong in the top 10 pfp no matter how old he is or how good he used to be. PFP is today. A boxer doesn't get extra points for being old and past prime.