I'm a great fan of both. I'm curious who would win against Lomachenko vs the Pacquiao that fought De la Hoya, Cotto, and Hatton. What do you think?
http://c7.alamy.com/comp/C2KAP0/manny-pacquiao-juan-manuel-marquez-and-manny-pacquiao-weigh-ins-for-C2KAP0.jpg
https://www.boxnation.com/media/12068/lomachenko-weigh-in.jpg?anchor=center&mode=crop&width=640
Pac was beating the very best many devisions ABOVE his natural weight. Meanwhile Loma is whooping nobodies BELOW his natural weight. So wtf is y'all even comparing. **** ridiculous.
I would say Lomachenko of it comes down to pure skills alone. But Pacquiao by late TKO probably because of the hige gap in power, and each landed punch of Pacquiao would damage Loma.
The only time we saw a Prime Pacquiao at his naturalweight (135) was at 135 where he looked untouchable.
I agree with your second half but come on man...Manny knows everything there is about boxing. I agree Loma is special...but to say Pac doesn't match him in skill must mean you are a blinkered modernist.
Very hard to pick.
Just going by what both have achieved I would have to say Manny but it would definitely be a war.
I think I might have to sit on the fence with this one and say a draw though.
I got Manny in this one. Too fast, too much pressure, too much power.
Prime Pacquiao was a monster, but Lomachenko's skill is just amazing. I don't know how this fight would look like, it's a 50/50 fight for me.