Let's refresh our memories: How did you score Tyson Fury vs. Deontay Wilder I?

From the article I linked (I found it interesting). Apply it to your scoring and see what you get now. Here's the scoring criteria, as noted in ring tv website: The criteria for scoring a knock down is not based on the premise that the fighter who scores the knockdown automatically is awarded a 10-8. The correct criteria that is taught by Duane Ford in his ABC certification classes for boxing judges is: If Fighter A is winning the round and scores a knockdown and continues to win the round after the knockdown, then Fighter A is awarded the round 10-8. However, if Fighter A is winning the round and gets knocked down by Fighter B, then Fighter B is awarded the round 10-9. The key is: Which fighter won the round without the knockdown? Thus, most fans and TV commentators are incorrect in automatically scoring a 10-8 round for a fighter who scores a knock down without taking into consideration who won the round without the knock down.

If your being generous to wilder he could have been within 2 points to fury. So a 114-112 seems fair to fury. But I'm not sure the knock down rounds wilder deserved 10-8

I don't think I kept score, but when it was over I was convinced Wilder had lost his title. In retrospect I can see how the fight could've been scored close, but I have a hard time seeing Wilder winning on points.

The consensus does seem to be as I expected. Based off what I saw that night, I don't think an immediate rematch is necessary. It isn't like Wilder can go away and "work on a few things." He was exposed and will never get near the levels Fury is at.

I had it 9 rounds to Fury, 3 rounds to Wilder... 115 (Fury).... 111 (Wilder). After a few days and just looking for ways to score my rounds to Wilder I watch the fight again and gave another round to Wilder. Which made my scorecard 114 (Fury) and 112 (Wilder)... No way did Wilder win that fight. Can’t see any justification once you score it round by round.

116-110 fury

I had Fury ahead 2 points heading into the 12th and a draw at the end of the fight. No but, show us your card. Show us how you scored the first 11

I scored it 115-111 for Fury Only gave Wilder the 2 KD rounds 10-8 and I think round 2 as well

Currently: 22 Fury 4 Draw 0 Wilder

115-111 Fury

I had it 9-3, 115-111 for Fury

I had Fury winning by 2 but it's not like he hurt Wilder at any moment. He made Wilder miss a lot but after rewatching the fight, Tyson was missing as well. To me, his ring generalship won him the fight but I wasn't mad at the draw. There are judges that score based on impact. Wilder dropped him twice so there is an argument that at least from a ringside perspective, Wilder shots were harder. As a fan , I wish they were fighting next

I had Wilder winning 11 rounds to 1. I gave Fury the 12th

It was a very close and boring fight which I gave Tyson Fury the slight edge on just ring generalship alone. I think a score of 114-112 or 114-113 (the way I scored it) sounds about right. No, the fight was not a robbery or a blow out. One can easily get the impression that Fury was not in there to win but just to merely survive and last the distance. There were several close rounds where he did almost next to nothing but make Deontay Wilder miss. Moreover, he did not put his punches together, hurt Deontay Wilder or beat him up. He just put his trust solely into the hands of the three judges. If Tyson Fury, doesn't change his style quickly he will get his first loss very soon because you just can't win fights on defense alone. I thought that he got lucky this time by the judges scoring it a draw but next he may not be as lucky. Had he fought Anthony Joshua under similar circumstances. One can be certain that he would have surely lost that fight. You scored for Fury, by the closest margin possible, then try to slander his style? He gave Wilder an absolute boxing lesson and you are living in denial.

You can also tell them apart by them posting essays and not being able to give a straight answer. "It was close", "could have gone either way", "it's hard to tell because Wilder was coming forward". They are trying to convince themselves and others that Wilder deserves rounds, but it's a fallacy. Wilder was clueless and got his ears boxed off.

12th round KO. Ref couldn't count for shyt. The ref counted fine. Fury was up on 9.

Haha, I know. Tell me you saw the Americans getting it badly wrong just after the fight? This was happening all over the place. Forums and YT comments. I know they say their schools are in a bad place. But this bad? It's basic maths that a 4 year old could do. The thing that gets me is how the consensus among certain groups of fans/posters is that Fury is now ducking... Fury went to the man's country and whooped him infront of his own people. Clearly, resoundingly gave him a lesson in the fine art of boxing. It's the same group of "fans" you're talking about who can't score a damn fight in the first place haha.

It was a very close and boring fight which I gave Tyson Fury the slight edge on just ring generalship alone. I think a score of 114-112 or 114-113 (the way I scored it) sounds about right. No, the fight was not a robbery or a blow out. One can easily get the impression that Fury was not in there to win but just to merely survive and last the distance. There were several close rounds where he did almost next to nothing but make Deontay Wilder miss. Moreover, he did not put his punches together, hurt Deontay Wilder or beat him up. He just put his trust solely into the hands of the three judges. If Tyson Fury, doesn't change his style quickly he will get his first loss very soon because you just can't win fights on defense alone. I thought that he got lucky this time by the judges scoring it a draw but next he may not be as lucky. Had he fought Anthony Joshua under similar circumstances. One can be certain that he would have surely lost that fight.

The score that baffles me is Alejandro Rochin's 115-111 for Wilder. That's 7-5 in rounds? Madness. Would have been less outrageous if there'd been a card for Fury and two 113-113 cards. Still outrageous, but just a little less-so. But 115-111 Wilder is almost criminal. We know this judge had to be on the payroll. Nothing else makes sense.

Lol. If you read his first paragraph he says he gave Wilder the two KD rounds, plus rounds 2, 4, 7 and 8. That would make it 6-6, but the KDs making it 114-112 Wilder? But then says 8-4 or 9-3 Fury? Hmm... Then says either way it was a draw... Haha, I know. Tell me you saw the Americans getting it badly wrong just after the fight? This was happening all over the place. Forums and YT comments. I know they say their schools are in a bad place. But this bad? It's basic maths that a 4 year old could do.