GEORGE GROVES has been removed from ITV's panel for Saturday's fight between James DeGale and Chris Eubank Jnr. The former WBA super-middleweight champion was due to be a pundit on the channel for the all-British battle at the O2. But it is understood Groves has been taken off at the request of one of the fighter's involved. Click Here To Read More]
If it wasn't DeGale or Eubank it must of been Froch.
Lol everyone hates Groves. But yeah it cant be Froch. He and his nose work for sky sports, this fight is on ITV.
Which man is more the eaten up by loss?
May I mention that blow job saunders was a pundit during the unpleasant refereeing at the Eubank Jnr challenge for the Lonsdale belt?? It will not bother Eubank Jnr in the slightest and is a clear view on how degayle has NOT learned as a man OR pro boxer to accept a loss against two things, the better man on the night OR a lesson in life. So, back to the sour grapes legacy for which he intends to be remembered for?
I would say three words but one is only needed.
Kunt.
I STRONGLY suspect the Eubanks, Snr was trying to dictate to SKY the commentary team on a previous fight.
Not sure exactly which fight but i believe he was insisting that Barry McGuigan commented on one of Junior's fights because McGuigan was 'Eubank friendly'.
That was during negotiations for the Golovkin fight.
It doesn't necessarily mean it was Sr this time. Although if it is, it's a great mind game :lol1:
I heard he's still on the broadcast anyway.
I STRONGLY suspect the Eubanks, Snr was trying to dictate to SKY the commentary team on a previous fight.
Not sure exactly which fight but i believe he was insisting that Barry McGuigan commented on one of Junior's fights because McGuigan was 'Eubank friendly'.
I think it was likely team DeGale as they have a genuine hatred of Groves. However, if it was team Eubank, this is a fantastic mind game as the vast majority of people will assume it was DeGale.