Do u consider Pac a legit world champion?

After Josesito beats Thurman, Pac vs Josesito... Lol dont see it happening. It'll be an immediate rematch for Thurman if that happens.

thurman is fighting a guy pac already beat and had no problem against................................................. Thurman? We'll rate him when he fights a few more times. The captain of the division is Spence.

Do u consider his WBA Regular belt a legit world title? Pacquiao is the WBA world champion. Thurman is the WBA super champion. If you consider the WBA a recognized organization, then Pacquiao is a world champion.

Nope but he is way beyond that, he is a living legend.

As legit as any of these other belt holders. Id say you have to unify at least two of these ABC's to be considered a legit champion.

yes. thurman hasn't fought since 2017 and is fighting lopez next. manny didn't even lose to horn. he is a champion

WBA is corrupt. If it was WBO or WBC, Thurman would've been stripped for being inactive for 2 years!!! Pacman is a better champ than Thurman will ever be!! Keeping that belt hostage for two years is a disgrace!!! HOW R U MORE INACTIVE THAN A PART TIME BOXER WHO WORKS IN THE SENATE?? Keep ducking Spence you one time champ. At this rate, Pac will be facing Spence before you have the balls to even try That's the crazy part, for Pac boxing is a part time gig now and yet he is more active then Thurman.

WBA is corrupt. If it was WBO or WBC, Thurman would've been stripped for being inactive for 2 years!!! Pacman is a better champ than Thurman will ever be!! Keeping that belt hostage for two years is a disgrace!!! HOW R U MORE INACTIVE THAN A PART TIME BOXER WHO WORKS IN THE SENATE?? Keep ducking Spence you one time champ. At this rate, Pac will be facing Spence before you have the balls to even try

Huh? Double check your facts there... OP There is an argument for it. Thurman has been really inactive and basically was allowed to hold the belt hostage. And there is the fact that we are talking about pacman who obviously earned the title of champion. Because its Pac and because Thurman hasn't fought I'm cool with it. Lol After Josesito beats Thurman, Pac vs Josesito...

Do u consider his WBA Regular belt a legit world title? I say there's an argument that Pac is the true WBA champ because Thurman's been so inactive & is taking a "tune-up" for a comeback. Thoughts? Probably. If it was WBC, WBA or WBO Thurman would have been stripped and given some emeritus belt instead and Pacquiao would have won the vacant belt. Nobody is the man at the weight as yet.

No. Nothing against Pac, but there can only be one WBA champion, not Super, regular, interim. It dilutes the value of the belt. I hate that Canelo fought crappy fielding for that piece of crap belt too. Again, I love Canelo, but he was fooling nobody with that win and championship. Canelo/fielding was for a title? Lol what. I guess this further dilutes the argument of “oh but he fought more champions than anyone of recent times” Too many of them claim they are. That’s why it’s refreshing to see a fighter unify a division.. clearing up once and for all who’s best.

thurman is fighting a guy pac already beat!!!! Huh? Double check your facts there... OP There is an argument for it. Thurman has been really inactive and basically was allowed to hold the belt hostage. And there is the fact that we are talking about pacman who obviously earned the title of champion. Because its Pac and because Thurman hasn't fought I'm cool with it. Lol

No way. The WBA regular is a paper title.

why not? who among the top WWs right now has a better resume? maybe thurman's at par. but definitely not spence, crawford or porter.

Hello no. All these organizations are illegitimate and corrupt, let alone that stupid "regular" thing. thurman is fighting a guy pac already beat and had no problem against.................................................

thurman is fighting a guy pac already beat!!!!

No, the champions at WW are Spence/Crawford/Thurman/Porter.

Of course not.

I would say no. I have an issue with all of these secondary belts just to milk more money in sanctioning fees for title fights. It is bad enough each weight class has four different champions, I can’t honor the “regular” or silver or whatever secondary titles are out there.

No. Nothing against Pac, but there can only be one WBA champion, not Super, regular, interim. It dilutes the value of the belt. I hate that Canelo fought crappy fielding for that piece of crap belt too. Again, I love Canelo, but he was fooling nobody with that win and championship.