Alright I wanna get something strait for us Golovkin fans...
1st off I am one of the biggest Golovkin fans in the world.. I Also happen to have a cat named Golovkin... IMO Golovkin clearly one the 1st fight but the 2nd fight Nelo more clearly won.. Be honest he gave Golovkin the fight he wanted and completely dominated him in ever aspect of the sport!!!
Lets go waiting to hear my fellow GGG fans hate on me cause they biased AF.. BTW I still cheering GGG in the Trilogy I just believe Nelo gunna give it 2 him worse this time
you G-stans simply don't know how to score a fight
even the judge who scored the first fight for Golovkin awarded the rematch to Canelo
even Abel Sanchez admitted that Golovkin did not win
when scoring a fight..... you need to strictly follow the official criteria, and you need to watch both fighters
Yes because the promoter has more money long term in Canelo than GGG. Don't be so ****ing dense.
And you accuse Golovkin of ducking when Canelo gave up his title to avoid him. Your a hypocrite..
son, after Canelo vacated, he continued to negotiate with Hypekin
but that negotiation died because Mr " anyone from 154-168 " shat the bed over weight..... AGAIN!!
you bash Canelo for vacating..... despite the fact that the WBC gave him a ridiculous 15-day deadline to negotiate with a bunch of liars who were attempting to get an undeserved 45%..... and despite the fact that Canelo continued negotiating with Bullshltkin..... and yet you don't say a word about Golovkin being stripped for ducking Derevyanchenko, or ducking Charlo
so if Golovkin will not fight Derevy, or Charlo, or Jacobs..... who will he fight next?
you do know..... that when Bullshltkin selects another mismatch opponent, you are gonna cop it, right?
nah, I know who the fanboys are
that is why you cry about weight when it comes to Canelo, but never even mention the fact that Golovkin did the same thing
And you accuse Golovkin of ducking when Canelo gave up his title to avoid him. Your a hypocrite..
Hopefully I don't have to explain this to you again. You argue with so many people your losing track.
nah, I know who the fanboys are
that is why you cry about weight when it comes to Canelo, but never even mention the fact that Golovkin did the same thing
Check my signature, GGG won the first fight CLEARLY, 2nd fight was closer, i wouldnt even have been mad about a draw, but they stole his ****in belts to feed the golden goose and some of you lame degenerates dont get it, you applaud corruption.
fair call, so long as that stands for BOTH fighters.....
otherwise, you know what happens.....
#theelephant
Hopefully I don't have to explain this to you again. You argue with so many people your losing track.
No as I posted numerous times on this forum and I will post again I don't consider fighting for a title at a catch weight meaningful. It's bad enough that there are multiple weight divisions and and multiple sanctioning bodies with multiple champions in each division.
fair call, so long as that stands for BOTH fighters.....
otherwise, you know what happens.....
#theelephant
you mean..... like when Mr " anyone from 154-168 " demanded a 164lb catchweight from Ward?
or is that somehow..... " different ".....? :lol1:
No as I posted numerous times on this forum and I will post again I don't consider fighting for a title at a catch weight meaningful. It's bad enough that there are multiple weight divisions and and multiple sanctioning bodies with multiple champions in each division.
It's obvious that Golovkin was avoided by Canelo untill he showed some vulnerability against Jacobs. Canelo hid behind his demand that Golovkin cut weight and Oscar came up with "the fight needs to marinate" excuse. The idea that a reigning champion has to cut weight in order to fight a contender simply because he's popular is ridiculous.
you mean..... like when Mr " anyone from 154-168 " demanded a 164lb catchweight from Ward?
or is that somehow..... " different ".....? :lol1:
Closests margin possible?
Tell me why Jabkin left the arena crying in Broner fashion, looking like a hills have eyes character? Meanwhile Canelo looked like he was going to a photo shoot.
CLOSE FIGHT DOE!
Why did he leave the arena. I don't know. Maybe ask the men and he'll tell you. Could be he was just pissed off. And sure, he was marked up - a lot worse than Canelo. That old skin, y'know..:lol1:
What has any of this got to do with your claim that it was a 'one sided beatdown'?
A one sided beatdown that he won by the closest possible margin? That most people watching saw Golovkin win or at least Draw?
If you think Canelo did enough to win that's cool and it's a perfectly valid opinion, but a 'one sided beatdown' is something it absolutely wasn't.
Closests margin possible?
Tell me why Jabkin left the arena crying in Broner fashion, looking like a hills have eyes character? Meanwhile Canelo looked like he was going to a photo shoot.
CLOSE FIGHT DOE!
It's obvious that Golovkin was avoided by Canelo untill he showed some vulnerability against Jacobs. Canelo hid behind his demand that Golovkin cut weight and Oscar came up with "the fight needs to marinate" excuse. The idea that a reigning champion has to cut weight in order to fight a contender simply because he's popular is ridiculous.
no one legit uses compubox. and its not a fight. its a boxing match. i heard that and over when floyd ran and grazed people lightly with his jab. ITS NOT A FIGHT ITS BOXING! now its a fight and not boxing gee ok
show me where pushing out pitty-pat jabs are valid scoring criteria
* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* ring generalship
* defence
Mayweather opponents used to follow him around like a lost puppy while getting touched up..... Floyd won rounds by defence, and because his opponent did nothing but give him opportunities
Golovkin got backed-up and beaten-up
most un-Mexican, and hardly how a champion should defend his title
I just don't understand how you guys can keep calling the second fight close. It was a one sided beat down by canelo.
If anything the first fight was close.
A one sided beatdown that he won by the closest possible margin? That most people watching saw Golovkin win or at least Draw?
If you think Canelo did enough to win that's cool and it's a perfectly valid opinion, but a 'one sided beatdown' is something it absolutely wasn't.
Wtf did GGG do in the second fight? Like it hurt me to watch I am just an honest fan. Fak you and your agendas
yea I don't get that at all
Canelo shaded Golovkin in EVERY area
oh, every area except backing up and pushing out pitty-pat jabs to keep Canelo off him
Canelo clearly won the fight, there is no question about that
they are adding up jabs on compubox, completely forgetting that it was a fight
you can tell by the justification they use, the official scoring criteria has largely been ignored
issues like this separate the casuals from the hardcore fans
most of the fans who scored that fight for Jabkin probably called Mayweather a runner
no one legit uses compubox. and its not a fight. its a boxing match. i heard that and over when floyd ran and grazed people lightly with his jab. ITS NOT A FIGHT ITS BOXING! now its a fight and not boxing gee ok
I just don't understand how you guys can keep calling the second fight close. It was a one sided beat down by canelo.
If anything the first fight was close.
they are adding up jabs on compubox, completely forgetting that it was a fight
you can tell by the justification they use, the official scoring criteria has largely been ignored
issues like this separate the casuals from the hardcore fans
most of the fans who scored that fight for Jabkin probably called Mayweather a runner