Can some one please explain what "exposed" mean?

Hold on there buddy, televised high profile fights & it doesn't matter what they are Mexican, black, Rican, or whatever as long as they are good match ups. You trying to get to fights nobody sees, this isn't a roll of the dice....LOL....I see you. Hhaa just a suggestion. I'm good either way. High profile it is. First round coming up, what high profile fights are first up?

I would suggest fights with no black or Mexican fighters. To test our knowledge beyond fights of guys we know well and are fans of. Would make it harder to win. Hold on there buddy, televised high profile fights & it doesn't matter what they are Mexican, black, Rican, or whatever as long as they are good match ups. You trying to get to fights nobody sees, this isn't a roll of the dice....LOL....I see you.

Lol now that I read your posta like that it is over the top hilarious lol. Nothing wrong with respectful shlt talking. I know I'm always down It's all in good fun. Wilder/GGG/Floyd/Joshua/Pac, I'm always poking fun at these guys to mess with the fans. Watch them get angry. Super hilarious. :beerchug:

Not heated, was mostly shooting jabs at Razor for shiiits and giggles. This place is fun when you troll a bit and poke fun at each other. I was laughing at the EXPOSED words in a sentence. Didn't think it came off as jacked up. Lol now that I read your posta like that it is over the top hilarious lol. Nothing wrong with respectful shlt talking. I know I'm always down

Yes, and a lot of posters on here also said GGG and Canelo were afraid to fight Jermall and that he was the best middleweight in the world. I don't read any posts anymore saying that. It's not that Jermall can't fight some and isn't a good fighter but he was being rated as much better than well proven middleweights when he had done so little at 160. When he had a much harder fight than expected with an average boxer he was supposed to quickly KO he got exposed as not being nearly as good as he and some of his fans said he was. Jermall vs ggg will not happen unless ggg changes his career strategy. Jermall vs Canelo can happen but Jermall would have to beat ggg first or wait 4 years. Imo Jermall would give ggg a good fight. I say it's still a pick em fight.

Sure not problem. I'll use it in a sentence. Charlo was exposed as a hype job after being declared by the LDBC (Lions Den Boxing Cubs) as the middleweight boogie man, which Canelo and GGG were ducking. There. Ggg was exposed as hypejob of the decade. Let's have them fight... But true fact, ggg don't want charlo. It's been beaten to death here before his win. Yes I said it, charlo won his fight and it wasn't a robbery.

Exposed is moreso when we see a fighter weakness get took advantage of first time. Victor Ortiz got exposed by Marcos Pacquaio got exposed by Marquez Imo Paulie exposed Broner Marg exposed Cotto Martinez exposed Willams Ward exposed Sergey All these fighters became easily beatable afterwards...The blueprint was set Fury aint expose Wilder numbnuts! When his last fight we saw his weakness already being exploited.

A blatant example of the abuse of the word 'expose' was when Horn was beaten by Crawford. We had those who were upset that their idol Packy had been officially beaten by Horn and who saw the Crawford result as some sort of justification or acknowledgement for their claim so that Horn had been 'exposed' as some sort of fraud who could only beaten Packy through corruption. Then we had the American status quo thing, who was this unknown foreigner coming over here thinking that he could beat our best, geez let's hope he can't, is it possible? Followed by relief that he couldn't, ha what a bum, he's been exposed, how did he get to be a challenger anyway. Of course both the above attitudes carried with them the accusation that boxing officialdom was somehow in the wrong, to put it mildly. No thought that their criticism could damage the sport that they claim to follow, apparently their fandom was far more important and it's all that mattered. No thought that Horn may have had a bad day, no acknowledgement of how good Crawford is, no acknowledgement that his camp were a bunch of amateurs and his preparation rubbish. Nope, he was exposed as a hopeless bum and on this one performance should be written off forever. Geez.

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2012/01/09/sports/YBOXING/YBOXING-jumbo.jpg http://www.pound4pound.com/Photos/MarleneMarquez/2011/MaidanavsMorales/kirkland%203.jpg It's kinda like that.

Being not as good as someone original thought, isn't exposing the boxing. It would be exposing the observer's eye for talent or lack there of. Being not as good is different to being thought of as being special.

Props I don't know you twos relationship, but you seemed to end what appeared to be a heated debate with class. Not heated, was mostly shooting jabs at Razor for shiiits and giggles. This place is fun when you troll a bit and poke fun at each other. I was laughing at the EXPOSED words in a sentence. Didn't think it came off as jacked up.

COOL. :fing02: We just need to get some good scraps & so far not much. Lets keep count as we go on debating fights. I would suggest fights with no black or Mexican fighters. To test our knowledge beyond fights of guys we know well and are fans of. Would make it harder to win.

Props I don't know you twos relationship, but you seemed to end what appeared to be a heated debate with class. Actually I have watched fights for years & even fought in that boxing ring & when I see comments that don't add up with what actually happens in fights I chime in to deflect that negativity even if they get negative with me (I defend myself) just like when they say Floyd Mayweather runs he doesn't fight & I see him making people miss while landing his punches so it makes no sense for these people to say the opposite. For some reason I can't let the nonsense go & I have fun with it & debate or try to "expose" them....lol...Now I'm waiting for some close matched fights or something he would not agree with me so we can keep count of our predictions.

Someone getting “ expose”doesn’t mean they lose or lost. It could be people seeing that someone isn’t so especially like original thought. Being not as good as someone original thought, isn't exposing the boxing. It would be exposing the observer's eye for talent or lack there of.

Someone getting “ expose”doesn’t mean they lose or lost. It could be people seeing that someone isn’t so especially like original thought.

Does it mean losing? Because every fighter has lost. Whether it was a legit lose or a questionable win. All of them. All the greats many times the L came from lesser opposition. This is boxing bumps and bruises. Wins and loses. Many times a good fighter loses there are other factors that come in to play. Personal problems, injuries, off nights, bad match up or even there opponent was on some PED. Being a bum, hype job or exposed is hardly the reason. Can you imagine writing pacquiao off as a hype job after his first loss. Or Ali, or maweather after Castillo 1. You would have missed out on great careers. Let's stop downing a fighter for Losing and maybe start giving credit to the guy that won. Every fighter has lost and the your flavor of the month is going to too. I'm not sure the people using the term "exposed" know what it means. Wilder for example. Wider is the kimbo slice of boxing. He can't get exposed. If anything wilder is exposing the heavy weight division. A back alley fighter koing actual boxers. Because let's be real. EVERYBODY that Wilder has beat is better than wilder. Sure this will fall on deaf ears, but by you claiming every boxer that loses is "exposed" then you're sayin they lost to a "bum". If that's the case then every fighter sucks and boxing is a horrible sport. Can you imagine you not getting a job after a interview and some one comes in the parking lot calling you "exposed" and picking apart your resume. You win some you lose some. The Saying used to be, "it's not how you fall it's how you get back up". Well now it seems you can't lose a fcking round. Let's get it together. It means that a hated fighter loses

When Broner got his ass kicked by a journeyman fighter who lost to Khan, Alexander, faked a back injury to avoid Bradley, and went life & death with Josesito Lopez.

Sure not problem. I'll use it in a sentence. Charlo was exposed as a hype job after being declared by the LDBC (Lions Den Boxing Cubs) as the middleweight boogie man, which Canelo and GGG were ducking. There.Yes, and a lot of posters on here also said GGG and Canelo were afraid to fight Jermall and that he was the best middleweight in the world. I don't read any posts anymore saying that. It's not that Jermall can't fight some and isn't a good fighter but he was being rated as much better than well proven middleweights when he had done so little at 160. When he had a much harder fight than expected with an average boxer he was supposed to quickly KO he got exposed as not being nearly as good as he and some of his fans said he was.

Exposed gets thrown around OFTEN and most of the time it is not even used correctly especially on this forum Guys are 30+ year old children on this forum "I Hate This Guy Because Of The People Who Support Him" is the mentality on this forum and it is so bad for the sport. Your seconds paragraph to a T. Thank you for stating whT should be so painfully obvious.

COOL. :fing02: We just need to get some good scraps & so far not much. Lets keep count as we go on debating fights. Props I don't know you twos relationship, but you seemed to end what appeared to be a heated debate with class.