1. Lomachenko
2. Crawford
3. Canelo
4. Golovkin
5. M. Garcia
6. Spence
7. Inoue
8. Usyk
9. Sor Rungvisai
10. Wilder
http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/25516016/pound-pound-rankings-lomachenko-no-1-usyk-makes-move
THE PANEL: Dan Rafael, Teddy Atlas, Steve Kim, Bernardo Pilatti, Eric Raskin, Nick Parkinson, Nigel Collins, Joe Cortez, Charles Moynihan, Claudia Trejos and Salvador Rodriguez
The rankings are based on a descending points system, with a first-place vote receiving 10 points, a second-place vote receiving nine points and so on. A tie goes to the fighter with the highest ranking, and then with the most votes at that ranking.
It's a very strange list. Wilder is probably considered no.3 in the division, but the only heavyweight in the list. I blame Dan Rafael for that.
And Usyk that low? you could make a solid claim that he's no.1 really. He is certainly top 5, no questions asked.
P4P Usyk has a very good case for being above any of the heavyweights. In fact he should be well above any of them.
Fat Dan has been eating too many chocolate hashish brownies. His brownies were probably laced with some heavier chit too.
1. Lomachenko
2. Crawford
3. Usyk
4. Inoue
5. Golovkin
6. Rungvisai
7. Gvozdyk
8. Fury
9. Joshua
10. Estrada
No offense, but there's no possibility that Fury could be considered for the list. None at all
ESPN list is woefully bad.
1. Crawford
2. Lomachenko
3. Canelo
4. Sor Rungvisai
5. M. Garcia
6. Inoue
7. Usyk
8. Joshua
9. Nietes
10. Golovkin
How would Wilder or Spence be on any respectable Pound for Pound list? Is this a joke?
Lol yet you have Joshua there
Neither belong there, especially over GGG
Golovkin should not be higher than Usyk. He's fought twice this year and lost to Canelo. Usyk has 3 straight wins.
The top 3 is fine. But Usyk should be 4th along with Mikey 5th.
At this point, the unanimous top 5 should be Crawford, Canelo, Mikey, Loma and Usyk. However you have them ordered is up to you, but those should be your top 5.
Also, no HWs!
Not really but why not complain that Spence has like one good win in his whole career and he's over Usyk?
1. Lomachenko
2. Crawford
3. Canelo
4. Golovkin
5. M. Garcia
6. Spence
7. Inoue
8. Usyk
9. Sor Rungvisai
10. Wilder
http://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/25516016/pound-pound-rankings-lomachenko-no-1-usyk-makes-move
THE PANEL: Dan Rafael, Teddy Atlas, Steve Kim, Bernardo Pilatti, Eric Raskin, Nick Parkinson, Nigel Collins, Joe Cortez, Charles Moynihan, Claudia Trejos and Salvador Rodriguez
The rankings are based on a descending points system, with a first-place vote receiving 10 points, a second-place vote receiving nine points and so on. A tie goes to the fighter with the highest ranking, and then with the most votes at that ranking.
Lol @ Spence and Inoue being over Usyk
Simply not proven yet.
That was my first thought.
Also, what the hell is Wilder doing in the top ten when Joshua isn't, while he's beaten the better comp than Deontay. Fury also deserved the win against Wilder in the vast majority of the pros and casuals opinions.
It's a very strange list. Wilder is probably considered no.3 in the division, but the only heavyweight in the list. I blame Dan Rafael for that.
And Usyk that low? you could make a solid claim that he's no.1 really. He is certainly top 5, no questions asked.
How on earth is Crawford above Canelo when his best win is Postol, years ago.
That was my first thought.
Also, what the hell is Wilder doing in the top ten when Joshua isn't, while he's beaten the better comp than Deontay. Fury also deserved the win against Wilder in the vast majority of the pros and casuals opinions.
1. Canelo
2. Crawford
3. M. Garcia
4. Inoue
5. Usyk
6. Joshua
7. Estrada
8. Nietes
9. Golovkin
10. Spence
36. Salido
37. Lomaputa
Why you ruining this forum with your posts ?!? Are u troll or you really that dumb..