What Eric Morales would have done to Lomachenko

Nope, not is far worse, those fighter we're fighting in a primitive age of boxing . Sánchez had best wins against better champions than Pep. A lot of primitive fighters are overrated. Sadler was not better than W.Gomez, for example. Primitive? Go and study the era. You are being way too ignorant. Just admit you don't know the era and you've not done your research. I'd have more respect than you just brushing it off because you don't know it. Gomez was not remotely as great as Saddler. You actually can't be serious? Besides Gomez really did nothing above 122 and Saddler is the consensus #2 all-time at 126 according to ALL historians. You probably don't even know the significance of that series and indeed Pep's win either. He had a near fatal plane crash where it was unknown if he'd walk again, let alone fight again and was 134-1. He defeated Manuel Ortiz was ease and there's also Chalky Wright and plenty others. Ortiz was an all-time great and if you knew who he was and his background (i.e he's Mexican-American) you'd love him and his legacy. Besides if ONE win stands out and trumps out another resume or guy then why so high on Chavez? Chavez didn't beat one single great fighter in his entire career. You'd be using a double standard. I do know Chavez is great but if you are pointing out one win as an indicator then there's over 100 fighters with better signature wins than Chavez. That would be preposterous to rank Chavez that low (though he's clearly behind Whitaker for example). Pep's not "primitive", he was ruling in the golden era when Sugar Ray Robinson was around so hardly "primitive". If peak Sanchez had troubles with the speed and defense of Pat Ford, Ruben Castillo and Pat Cowdell how you think he'd fare chasing Pep around and forced to create openings? Pep's resume IMO falls far short of Greb p4p too. Greb scored 48 wins (a record) over 16 HOF members (a record) as a middleweight dominating all-time great light heavyweights and beating all the best heavyweights of his time but Dempsey who ducked him. Pep's resume also can't quite match Benny Leonard also but his numbers can his style holds the test of time and then some. Sanchez IMO is #3 all-time at 126 though I generally see him ranked just outside the top 5 with some siding with Attell, Dixon, Saldivar ahead of him.

maidana couldn't ko amir frickin khan. the guy is overrated as hell as a power puncher Power isnt some end all in Boxing and nobody ever said Maidana is a lights out puncher. What makes Maidana dangerous is his unconventional punching angles and unpredictability. There is nothing overrated about him. Look at what his style did to Mayweather. We cant just take one fight where he lost and judge him off that.

Don't waste your time. This guy is a jerk that said that Sal Sánchez is not un the top-ten of mexican history. This clown said that Chávez Lost against LaPorte and Lockridge. He does not know shi.t about this. Is a boxing nerd. Got it, he's an insecure hater. Thanks for the heads up.

Exactly. A fat and old Morales took all the power of Maidana and there are fools on here saying that Lil Lomachenko would K.O Erik? Jerks. maidana couldn't ko amir frickin khan. the guy is overrated as hell as a power puncher

Morales is so good that he even when he was on the slide, he kicked a prime pacman’s ass and scared the sht out of Maidana, fkin Maidana , and Danny Garcia while shot to sht. This guy is a supernatural fighter just like James Toney. Even when he is old and out of shape, he still kicks ass and that makes him a throwback fighter. Who gives a sht about Zahir raheem. It was a little hiccup and every fighter has off nights. It could have been a style thing but i sure wouldnt use that fight to gauge his ability. Morales would murder Lomachenko. Exactly. A fat and old Morales took all the power of Maidana and there are fools on here saying that Lil Lomachenko would K.O Erik? Jerks.

You said Whitaker’s prime was at 147 and that Sanchez is greater than Greb, Leonard and Pep. That’s far, far worse. Nope, not is far worse, those fighter we're fighting in a primitive age of boxing . Sánchez had best wins against better champions than Pep. A lot of primitive fighters are overrated. Sadler was not better than W.Gomez, for example.

Don't waste your time. This guy is a jerk that said that Sal Sánchez is not un the top-ten of mexican history. This clown said that Chávez Lost against LaPorte and Lockridge. He does not know shi.t about this. Is a boxing nerd. You're a Mexican Puppet. Nuff said .

Morales would of killed the midget

Morales is so good that he even when he was on the slide, he kicked a prime pacman’s ass and scared the sht out of Maidana, fkin Maidana , and Danny Garcia while shot to sht. This guy is a supernatural fighter just like James Toney. Even when he is old and out of shape, he still kicks ass and that makes him a throwback fighter. Who gives a sht about Zahir raheem. It was a little hiccup and every fighter has off nights. It could have been a style thing but i sure wouldnt use that fight to gauge his ability. Morales would murder Lomachenko.

I would pick Loma.

This guy said that a win against Linares is better than a win against zpacquiao You said Whitaker’s prime was at 147 and that Sanchez is greater than Greb, Leonard and Pep. That’s far, far worse.

Don't waste your time. This guy is a jerk that said that Sal Sánchez is not un the top-ten of mexican history. This clown said that Chávez Lost against LaPorte and Lockridge. He does not know shi.t about this. Is a boxing nerd. Why lie? I know your English is abysmal but I didn’t say Chavez lost those fights and I have Sanchez #4 Mexican all-time. It was Morales and Beristain who said Sanchez is not top 10. They, like me, know far more than you about boxing.

Just because someone has a different opinion doesn’t mean they know nothing. You are not right about everything and get fact checked often. I don’t agree with all his points all the time but I get a huge sense he knows far more than you about boxing in general. This guy said that a win against Linares is better than a win against zpacquiao

No, Taylor was not robbed. He was beaten into nearly to death. I recommend you the 12th round of Mosley vs Mayorga so you can see what can happen with two seconds left on the clock. Don't waste your time. This guy is a jerk that said that Sal Sánchez is not un the top-ten of mexican history. This clown said that Chávez Lost against LaPorte and Lockridge. He does not know shi.t about this. Is a boxing nerd.

Chavez was up 15 pounds yes and Whitaker was up 10 and they are the same age and you don't think Whitaker was ruining his life? He was a ****ing junkie for crying out loud. I didn't say I scored them against Chavez I said they were arguable and that's the consensus. Very close fights that if Chavez was, say, white you'd have said he lost or if he wasn't Mexican and LaPorte and Lockridge were Mexican you'd say they were robberies. Yes, Taylor was robbed. He led by too large a margin and with 2 seconds left he wouldn't take another punch so yes he got robbed. He got a beating but he won the boxing match. No, Taylor was not robbed. He was beaten into nearly to death. I recommend you the 12th round of Mosley vs Mayorga so you can see what can happen with two seconds left on the clock.

it was the 3rd time actually. My mistake, I stand corrected.

Totally clueless. Pea's best weight was not 147. DUH! That was stupid even for him. I've forgotten more about boxing than you will ever know, pendejo. I've been watching since Famosito Gomez was boxing at the Olympic. Been watching boxing since Jim Healy called Boxing At The Olympic. Went to the Westminster Boxing Club and saw Jackie McCoy train Rocky Garcia and Hector Elizondo before you're sorry wannabe expert azz was born. I'd be shocked if you even know how to wrap your hands. He doesn't even know who any of those people are or knows nothing of those places. His whole sthick is garbage. He's racially biased towards Mexico, sucks up to blacks because he thinks they all hate whites and thinks every other race is garbage. He's a garbage person and he always tells people they know nothing about boxing if they have a different, better and more objective opinion than him. In reality is boxing "knowledge" is about what mine was like when I was 10 or 11. I just just a lot more mature and level headed already by that age. He knows a few Mexican fighters names but has a terrible grasp of history and awful judgement yet he thinks he's above everyone including historians.

Lomachenko outboxes him. UD12

Withaker fought in 154, pounds against a strong natural superwelter and he did a very good job. His best weight was 147. Chávez 135-140. The consensus was that Chávez won those fights and the rivals we're competitives. No i don't café about that, Lockridge won the fight against Gómez, not Chávez. Read the ****ing rules, and we're not 2, seconds. Totally clueless. Pea's best weight was not 147. DUH!

You can understand me, and you don't know anything about another idiom. But most important, you don't know sh.it about boxing. Hahahaha linares win was better than Pacquiao win hahahahahaha fuuuuu.ck I've forgotten more about boxing than you will ever know, pendejo. I've been watching since Famosito Gomez was boxing at the Olympic. Been watching boxing since Jim Healy called Boxing At The Olympic. Went to the Westminster Boxing Club and saw Jackie McCoy train Rocky Garcia and Hector Elizondo before you're sorry wannabe expert azz was born. I'd be shocked if you even know how to wrap your hands.